jayu70 wrote:Jamaaliver wrote:ChokeFasncists wrote:
We shall see. With the new odds, I'm not sure if they want to do a Sixers type tank(again). Seems to me it's probably more sensible to do an in-between type to establish a good culture.
OTOH, if the three rookies turn out to be as good or better than the Warriors' one, why is it necessary to get another top pick?
It'd be interesting what happens, lets revisit this after the season...
But if we do get like a 5th pick, and get like an 8th pick from the Mavs and 12th pick from the Cavs, maybe trade up?

My thoughts exactly.
1. An in-between gets us back on the treadmill real fast.
Not necessarily, Trae, Huerter, Collins, Prince and Spellman could all become all stars, possibly three lottery picks next season, all could become all stars. Eight all stars should be enough. That most likely wouldn't happen but four to five would be enough. With the new odds, mid-lottery seeds have quite a bit more chance to get the top picks.
2. Schlenk did say he wasn't interested in a Philly style tank a season ago but his actions so far says otherwise.
Last year the team won 24, a far cry from the 10 win Sixers. He did waive Belli and Ily, but he also signed them. The PhillyCheese style tank would be to draft Doncic and insist him to be stashed, then trade Prince, Baze and Dedmon for another high pick and draft MPJ. Instead, he drafted one of the best college player ever, then instead of getting a green PG with potential to ensure losing, he got a vet who is a huge unknown, but potentially could pose high risk for the tank. Plus last year was last year, the draft has changed. It was the last chance at it.
3.
If the three rookies turn out to be as good or better than the Warriors' one, - that's a pipe dream that won't happen in ONE season (if that happens I'll be back for my serving of crow and eat it happily

) , you hope they're better than half as good though. At this stage of the rebuild, and yes, it's still a rebuild- we need as many top picks as possible regardless of the lottery odds.
Yeah, highly unlikely, but who knows? Isn't that the plan? ~lol~ One season, that's impossible, I'm only talking about long term. It's always good to have as many top picks as possible, it's just whether it's worth it or not and if the FO is indeed gunning for them.
4. There is no 'if TraeLin' pans out, it's all about if 'TRAE' pans out wether we are winning or losing.
Normally that's true, but this seems like a special case. Lin is the only other point guard on the 15 man roster. He is a big question mark. His performance could range from totally terrible out of the league kind to really really good helping everyone play well. His role is bigger cuz Trae might have problem physically adjusting to the NBA. But you are right, Trae would be the more important component here. I feel like he's a kinda boom or bust type, one evidence is that there's a wide range of opinion on how he's gonna pan out in the NBA. He's got a high ceiling and low floor. With innate disadvantage on D, his shot selection would be key. If he gets going, he could be lethal, keeping at normally tough shots, but if he gets frustrated, it could be a difficult way ahead. If this team is at the very bottom without a trade exchanging vets for picks, that'd most likely mean he's somewhat busty. That really sucks, who knows how Barrett's gonna turn out? Isn't it better if Trae booms and then with another somewhat high lottery pick, maybe it won't be a Simmons, Wiggins or Fultz, but could be a Curry, Lillard or Mitchell? Especially with Larry Riley on board.