ImageImage

Should the Packers trade for Bell?

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,668
And1: 8,094
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Should the Packers trade for Bell? 

Post#21 » by jakecronus8 » Thu Sep 13, 2018 7:12 pm

I'd do a third. He's got 2-3 years of dominance left in him.
Do it for Chuck
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,280
And1: 7,927
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Should the Packers trade for Bell? 

Post#22 » by Mags FTW » Thu Sep 13, 2018 7:17 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:A big Detroit weakness for years (since Sanders retired) has been RB. I would hate it they got Bell. But they might feel the need to make a move given their waxing Monday nikght.

Apparently a lot of the players dislike Patricia. Tate is on the last year of his deal. Outside of Slay and Ansah, their defense is meh. Rodgers and The Viking D are in their division. The Bears are rising.

They should just blow it up. Maybe even see what they could get for Stafford from someone like the Giants or Jags.
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,080
And1: 8,821
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: Should the Packers trade for Bell? 

Post#23 » by LikeABosh » Thu Sep 13, 2018 7:23 pm

No **** way. He's an awesome player, but I don't want the headache or gigantic cap hit he brings.

If we're using either of those 1st round picks in a trade, it better be for a real game changer. That would most likely be an OLB or some form of an elite pass rusher. But unless a miracle happens and Bosa or Von Miller are put on the trade block, I think it's best to keep those picks.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,643
And1: 54,861
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Should the Packers trade for Bell? 

Post#24 » by MickeyDavis » Thu Sep 13, 2018 8:09 pm

Mags FTW wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:A big Detroit weakness for years (since Sanders retired) has been RB. I would hate it they got Bell. But they might feel the need to make a move given their waxing Monday nikght.

Apparently a lot of the players dislike Patricia. Tate is on the last year of his deal. Outside of Slay and Ansah, their defense is meh. Rodgers and The Viking D are in their division. The Bears are rising.

They should just blow it up. Maybe even see what they could get for Stafford from someone like the Giants or Jags.


Yeah, the hard ass approach (Lombardi, Belichick) works when you're winning regularly. Caldwell was laid back but he did have 3 winning seasons out of 4 and 2 playoff appearances. I could see the Lions season getting ugly if they don't win in SF this week. They have New England, at Dallas and Green Bay following.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,760
And1: 16,438
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Should the Packers trade for Bell? 

Post#25 » by humanrefutation » Thu Sep 13, 2018 9:03 pm

Mags FTW wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:A big Detroit weakness for years (since Sanders retired) has been RB. I would hate it they got Bell. But they might feel the need to make a move given their waxing Monday nikght.

Apparently a lot of the players dislike Patricia. Tate is on the last year of his deal. Outside of Slay and Ansah, their defense is meh. Rodgers and The Viking D are in their division. The Bears are rising.

They should just blow it up. Maybe even see what they could get for Stafford from someone like the Giants or Jags.


There's always going to be pushback when you go from a player's coach to a disciplinarian-type, especially from veterans who liked to play for Caldwell. They just didn't have a high ceiling with him at HC.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,760
And1: 16,438
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Should the Packers trade for Bell? 

Post#26 » by humanrefutation » Thu Sep 13, 2018 9:04 pm

And yes, I'd definitely target Bell, but I wouldn't surrender top picks for him even if he was willing to re-sign.

Return to Green Bay Packers