15-16 Pistons in retrospect
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
15-16 Pistons in retrospect
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,583
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Mar 31, 2012
-
15-16 Pistons in retrospect
I was just thinking about Monroe turning down his qo and becoming an ufa in 2015, before leaving. And as I look at the front-court now, I'm curious of something. Would you fans rather have a front-court of Griffin/Drummond, Monroe/Drummond, Monroe and a stretch 4 or Drummond and a stretch 4?
NBA - Pelicans,Hornets
NFL - Panthers
MLB - Braves
NHL - Ducks, Hurricanes
NCAAB - Tarheels, Wolverines, CHA 49ers
NCAAF - Tarheels, Wolverines, CHA 49ers
Soccer - PSG, CLT FC, USMNT, FRA, SCO
Golf - Tiger Woods
Tennis - Rafael Nadal
NASCAR - Joey Lagano
NFL - Panthers
MLB - Braves
NHL - Ducks, Hurricanes
NCAAB - Tarheels, Wolverines, CHA 49ers
NCAAF - Tarheels, Wolverines, CHA 49ers
Soccer - PSG, CLT FC, USMNT, FRA, SCO
Golf - Tiger Woods
Tennis - Rafael Nadal
NASCAR - Joey Lagano
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,086
- And1: 1,156
- Joined: Jul 03, 2015
-
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
Griffin and Drummond, but Strech 4/ Drummond is tempting. If the stretch 4 is an Ilyasova, then it’s a no go. I’m interested in seeing what Casey can do with the talent of the Griffin/Drummond duo.
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 50,908
- And1: 18,049
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
Drummond and a stretch for me. Especially if we’re assuming the stretch isn’t making Griffin money.
Assuming that it’s not even close.
Assuming that it’s not even close.
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
- Mr Peanut
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,307
- And1: 3,873
- Joined: Jan 29, 2012
- Location: New Zealand
-
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
As others have said, Drummond and a stretch 4 but then if Griffin's 3 point shot keeps developing he could be that stretch 4.
Slightly off-topic but not really, when I saw the thread title i thought it would be reflecting on our team that made the surprise playoff run in 15-16 (Drummond, Harris, Morris, KCP, Jackson). Really enjoyed their style of play in that first round competitive sweep against the Cavs. Would be interesting to see where we would be now if we had kept that core together.
Slightly off-topic but not really, when I saw the thread title i thought it would be reflecting on our team that made the surprise playoff run in 15-16 (Drummond, Harris, Morris, KCP, Jackson). Really enjoyed their style of play in that first round competitive sweep against the Cavs. Would be interesting to see where we would be now if we had kept that core together.
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,211
- And1: 3,346
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
I'd rather ship out dre for someone to pair with blake - or at least some picks to build. Dre's just not a #1 scoring option and he's not a top defender and he's not a good leader. He's just not a guy you build around. He's maybe the 3rd or 4th guy on a quality team. You can win with a center that just rebounds and dunks, but you can't build around a center that just rebounds and dunks.
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,968
- And1: 4,896
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
I like Griffin more than most. He’s a legit star. Karl Malone when healthy.
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,727
- And1: 738
- Joined: Apr 17, 2016
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
Super Powered wrote:I was just thinking about Monroe turning down his qo and becoming an ufa in 2015, before leaving. And as I look at the front-court now, I'm curious of something. Would you fans rather have a front-court of Griffin/Drummond, Monroe/Drummond, Monroe and a stretch 4 or Drummond and a stretch 4?
Drummond and a stretch four, without any hesitation. Monroe/Drummond was a spacing disaster, Monroe himself has gone tremendously downhill as a post-reliant player--in a league that is now rather harsh toward post players--who cannot defend the rim, and Drummond and Griffin are a pair that will take away from each other and do not at all fit together or into the modern NBA.
Tobias Harris provided better value to this team than Griffin did, because he was a far better fit with Drummond and Jackson and provided reliable shooting and shot creation that this team is now desperately short on. He also cost tremendously less than Griffin, and will--barring a superstar season--almost certainly cost far less than Griffin even on his next contract. It also helps that he's healthier and the consummate team-first guy.
ComboGuardCity wrote:I like Griffin more than most. He’s a legit star. Karl Malone when healthy.
No offense, but this has zero basis in reality. Malone is one of the greatest power forwards of all time. Griffin does not compare, and he never has.
As for being a "legit star," that depends on one's definition. It's also an irrelevant appellation; the truly important measure for any player is the value he provides to his team. Griffin is heavily fit-reliant, and he's a poor fit here. That severely impairs his value. "OMG BIG NAME" does not change that in the least. Some players, notably the elite wings that currently power NBA offenses, fit everywhere. Griffin does not.
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,211
- And1: 3,346
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
Prime malone posted a 31/12 season. No other big has come close to that since. Prime Blake had a 24/10 year - which is insanely good - but that is not in the same ballpark.
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
- Manocad
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,969
- And1: 10,562
- Joined: Dec 13, 2005
- Location: Middle Fingerton
- Contact:
-
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
ComboGuardCity wrote:I like Griffin more than most. He’s a legit star. Karl Malone when healthy.
I'll have some of what you're smoking.

Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,931
- And1: 2,216
- Joined: Jun 25, 2013
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
Karl Malone put up 20 and 8 as a 39-year-old.
He had the greatest pure pg of all time passing him the ball, but he also didn't have to rely on athleticism to be effective. He had a skillset that aged extremely well.
Blake has neither. Yet at least.
He had the greatest pure pg of all time passing him the ball, but he also didn't have to rely on athleticism to be effective. He had a skillset that aged extremely well.
Blake has neither. Yet at least.
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,931
- And1: 2,216
- Joined: Jun 25, 2013
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
Also, Malone played 80+ games in 17 of his 19 seasons. He played half seasons in the other two.
Let's just say Blake hasn't been nearly as... lucky.
Let's just say Blake hasn't been nearly as... lucky.
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 50,908
- And1: 18,049
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: 15-16 Pistons in retrospect
Oh freaking please.
Griffin is NOT as good as Karl Malone when healthy, and that’s pretending “when healthy” is even relevant to any discussion involving Blake at this point.
Karl had skills Blake will never dream of.
Griffin is NOT as good as Karl Malone when healthy, and that’s pretending “when healthy” is even relevant to any discussion involving Blake at this point.
Karl had skills Blake will never dream of.