ImageImageImageImageImage

OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1161 » by Clyde_Style » Tue Oct 2, 2018 9:52 am

thebuzzardman wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
Until he changes his mind again


He did. I don't have time. Go look it up.

Oh, I see you changed your post. He tweeted it. It is binding. There are no longer any constraints. As soon as he did the FBI went to Swetnick. They will dig wherever they want to now.


Serious question, - for anyone. Because it's Trump.

Did he really intend for the investigation to be open, or was it one of his dumb tweets that inadvertently opened the door?


The tweet was actually straightforward by his unhinged standards and appears to have been formally issued using his Twitter account. It was the aftermath of the dumb part which was the massive blowback at trying to put constraints on an investigation. It was intended to be a "secret" directive to the FBI that got leaked out of multiple leaky holes immediately. Flake then probably put the screws on Trump by saying the constraints would not be satisfactory.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,590
And1: 95,382
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1162 » by thebuzzardman » Tue Oct 2, 2018 9:54 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
He did. I don't have time. Go look it up.

Oh, I see you changed your post. He tweeted it. It is binding. There are no longer any constraints. As soon as he did the FBI went to Swetnick. They will dig wherever they want to now.


Serious question, - for anyone. Because it's Trump.

Did he really intend for the investigation to be open, or was it one of his dumb tweets that inadvertently opened the door?


The tweet was actually straightforward by his unhinged standards and appears to have been formally issued using his Twitter account. It was the aftermath of the dumb part which was the massive blowback at trying to put constraints on an investigation. It was intended to be a "secret" directive to the FBI that got leaked out of multiple leaky holes immediately. Flake then probably put the screws on Trump by saying the constraints would not be satisfactory.


Thanks for the recap. Time has been a little limited for me lately as well.
Image
User avatar
CharlesOakley
Veteran
Posts: 2,910
And1: 2,853
Joined: Jun 27, 2006

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1163 » by CharlesOakley » Tue Oct 2, 2018 3:23 pm

You would think Kavanaugh would pull his name when this started coming out. He could have easily said that he didn't want to put his family through this and returned to the federal bench. He doesn't strike me as a particularly intelligent man.
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,212
And1: 110,083
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1164 » by Capn'O » Tue Oct 2, 2018 4:51 pm

CharlesOakley wrote:You would think Kavanaugh would pull his name when this started coming out. He could have easily said that he didn't want to put his family through this and returned to the federal bench. He doesn't strike me as a particularly intelligent man.


He really does seem like an idiot. There are so many points where he cut off his own foot. Even during the hearing, I feel like even the accusations were a softball situation where he could have wowed with a heartfelt apology that the events happened to Ford even if he doesn't recall being involved.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,319
And1: 62,455
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1165 » by HarthorneWingo » Tue Oct 2, 2018 5:10 pm

My understanding (today) is that the investigation will be a meaningful one and will go where it needs to go. The speculation is that Trump, who is known not to drink alcohol at all and frowns upon those to do, has soured on Kavanaugh because of that.
Free Palestine
JohnStarksTheDunk
General Manager
Posts: 8,600
And1: 2,014
Joined: Aug 16, 2005
Location: Los Angeles
       

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1166 » by JohnStarksTheDunk » Tue Oct 2, 2018 5:21 pm

Capn'O wrote:
CharlesOakley wrote:You would think Kavanaugh would pull his name when this started coming out. He could have easily said that he didn't want to put his family through this and returned to the federal bench. He doesn't strike me as a particularly intelligent man.


He really does seem like an idiot. There are so many points where he cut off his own foot. Even during the hearing, I feel like even the accusations were a softball situation where he could have wowed with a heartfelt apology that the events happened to Ford even if he doesn't recall being involved.


That would have been the proper thing to do, under normal circumstances, but Kavanaugh was largely playing to an audience of one. Showing anything that could be perceived by the President as "weak" would have been worse for him, so in this case an angry, snide, unforgiving, arrogant persona was a wise strategy, assuming he wants the SCOTUS seat at any cost.

However, there are a number of other half-truths, exaggerations, mischaracterizations, fibs, and outright lies he made during the hearing that certainly point to some lack of intelligence. The statement that he had no connections at Yale was particularly idiotic, because it's such an easily disprovable claim. Whether or not he feels he earned his acceptance into Yale, he most certainly knows that his grandfather went there.
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,319
And1: 62,455
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1167 » by HarthorneWingo » Tue Oct 2, 2018 5:38 pm

JohnStarksTheDunk wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
CharlesOakley wrote:You would think Kavanaugh would pull his name when this started coming out. He could have easily said that he didn't want to put his family through this and returned to the federal bench. He doesn't strike me as a particularly intelligent man.


He really does seem like an idiot. There are so many points where he cut off his own foot. Even during the hearing, I feel like even the accusations were a softball situation where he could have wowed with a heartfelt apology that the events happened to Ford even if he doesn't recall being involved.


That would have been the proper thing to do, under normal circumstances, but Kavanaugh was largely playing to an audience of one. Showing anything that could be perceived by the President as "weak" would have been worse for him, so in this case an angry, snide, unforgiving, arrogant persona was a wise strategy, assuming he wants the SCOTUS seat at any cost.

However, there are a number of other half-truths, exaggerations, mischaracterizations, fibs, and outright lies he made during the hearing that certainly point to some lack of intelligence. The statement that he had no connections at Yale was particularly idiotic, because it's such an easily disprovable claim. Whether or not he feels he earned his acceptance into Yale, he most certainly knows that his grandfather went there.


Also, I think he/they knew that there was more than one such victim/incident. The apology doesn't really work if there's also things like cheering on a drunken gang rape out there.
Free Palestine
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,319
And1: 62,455
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1168 » by HarthorneWingo » Tue Oct 2, 2018 5:48 pm

Free Palestine
cgmw
RealGM
Posts: 22,540
And1: 10,440
Joined: Jul 23, 2003
Location: Winning now since 1973
Contact:
 

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1169 » by cgmw » Tue Oct 2, 2018 8:23 pm

NYT reporting Trump committed tax fraud based on over 200 of his Daddy's returns. Apparently Trump and siblings set up phony shell corps to receive gifts from daddy upwards of $243m to avoid taxes.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1170 » by Clyde_Style » Tue Oct 2, 2018 8:40 pm

cgmw wrote:NYT reporting Trump committed tax fraud based on over 200 of his Daddy's returns. Apparently Trump and siblings set up phony shell corps to receive gifts from daddy upwards of $243m to avoid taxes.


In an odd coincidence, on Sesame Street today the question was asked, "Can you spell A-S-S-E-T S-E-I-Z-U-R-E-S?"
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1171 » by Clyde_Style » Tue Oct 2, 2018 9:07 pm

GONYK wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Based on what?

If the FBI clears him to a degree that the Senate is comfortable confirming him, I don't see the avenue where that outcome is likely.

Are you anticipating some bombshell to come out after all of this?


There is a new accusation that is presently anonymous, but could be unmasked, that Kav and a buddy raped a girl repeatedly in the back of a car. She said he forced her to do fellatio and came in her mouth, then both raped her.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36529/released-transcript-kavanaugh-asked-about-amanda-prestigiacomo

The Senate already knew this. We'll see how comfortable they are with this kind of stuff by the time the FBI is done and more rape or abuse accusations surface.

I have no idea why you think it is likely they confirm, though they are an evil bunch so I wouldn't rule it out.


I think, given the current state of play, they are likely to confirm for 2 reasons:

1. None of the accusations have been corroborated in any way that is damning or prosecutable, and the R's see this as a war to maintain due process and precedence.

2. They know that if they don't get a judge in by mid-terms and the Dems take the House and possibly a few seats in the Senate, then they might not get another chance before the next Presidential election.

So unless something major comes out that really sticks, I see them ramming Kav through. I also think conservative Dems like Manchin will help them. The bar fight is an interesting development though. Speaks to temperament.


Due process? The confirmations are not a court room so your points are misplaced, because the exposure due to the accusations is what matters first, then you cross the bridge of investigations and indictments for rape or other crimes next.

Precedence? Whose? 200+ years of historical precedence or Merrick Garland and now this?

Per # 2, almost every single congressional member of the GOP has proven themselves to be purely in this for themselves. The illusion of party unity in the GOP's case is not at this point ideological other than hewing to the points of action their rich donors direct them to take. So the only calculus here is political suicide by confirming Kavanaugh or political\financial suicide by not doing their masters bidding.

Since it only takes 1 GOP senator to kill this it has become abundantly clear that Flake, Murkowski, Collins and Manchin played a game of deflection (with Flake now taunting Trump that one week of investigation will not suffice) in order to push this decision further down the road for one reason only. It is not morals. It is that they don't want to vote on Kavanaugh at all, because they don't want to vote for him personally or because their state constituency is telling them not to, but they don't want to piss off the money bags by voting NO. So I don't know where you get the notion that McConnell will get Kavanaugh approved. He cannot ram this through at this point regardless of you point about the calendar.

And if you don't think several rape or sexual misconduct accusations than can still easily morph into trials is not MAJOR, I don't know what to tell you. I know you're saying an accusation is not major to the GOP and you're right about that. But you're deeply misreading the impact of those accusations and how the social feedback nationwide has rippled through the Senate ranks in a big way already.

The bar fight is important, but not critical.

What is critical now is this and what you omitted. Kavanaugh has been a serial liar under oath to the Senate which is a federal crime. Now that the FBI has their teeth into him, that alone is a major deal that disqualifies him. Being an out of control drunk who allegedly also rapes people only at present needs firm testimony that shows he was a belligerent binge drinker to nail him for lying under oath. The FBI has that testimony now and a police report as hard evidence. The GOP has no say into whether the FBI now reports that Kavanaugh is now prosecutable for lying under oath.

Additionally, you've completely ignored that Orrin Hatch's office and perhaps multiple GOP Senators can now be investigated by the FBI for conspiracy to tamper with "due process" starting with the false lies put out that a classmate of Kavanaugh's was some kind of doppelganger Mrs. Ford mistakened for Kavanaugh. Look up Edward Whelan if that name is new to you. Primary GOP operatives played fast and loose with the truth. If the FBI proves it was directed by top GOP senators, this morphs into a forest fire. So much for due process.

And there may have been witness tampering by Kavanaugh himself against at least one of his accusers as well:

https://abovethelaw.com/2018/10/akin-gump-partner-is-the-woman-who-has-texts-that-suggest-kavanaugh-was-trying-to-discredit-ramirez-story-prior-to-publication/

Finally, I agree with the other comments that Kavanaugh is a dope. Not a single drop of intelligence gleams off of this henchman's flop sweat. He's the federal judge equivalent of Michael Cohen. He got into this position due to his willingness to kowtow to Lord Trump for a SCOTUS seat. It appears the one who subjugates themselves to Trump in the most transparent fashion gets the nod. Only difference here is Cohen is smart enough to cut bait. This guy will go down in flames for going this far and he will be prosecuted by someone. He is not getting approved for SCOTUS. That's BS.
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,399
And1: 27,083
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1172 » by Jalen Bluntson » Tue Oct 2, 2018 9:12 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:
cgmw wrote:NYT reporting Trump committed tax fraud based on over 200 of his Daddy's returns. Apparently Trump and siblings set up phony shell corps to receive gifts from daddy upwards of $243m to avoid taxes.


In an odd coincidence, on Sesame Street today the question was asked, "Can you spell A-S-S-E-T S-E-I-Z-U-R-E-S?"


The NYT isn't the courts. Are they reporting allegations? Absolute proof? Google is in my future!!
:beer: RIP mags
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1173 » by Clyde_Style » Tue Oct 2, 2018 9:17 pm

Are We Ther Yet wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
cgmw wrote:NYT reporting Trump committed tax fraud based on over 200 of his Daddy's returns. Apparently Trump and siblings set up phony shell corps to receive gifts from daddy upwards of $243m to avoid taxes.


In an odd coincidence, on Sesame Street today the question was asked, "Can you spell A-S-S-E-T S-E-I-Z-U-R-E-S?"


The NYT isn't the courts. Are they reporting allegations? Absolute proof? Google is in my future!!


It's a newspaper.

Free to read online so why are you asking me?
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,399
And1: 27,083
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1174 » by Jalen Bluntson » Tue Oct 2, 2018 9:25 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:
Are We Ther Yet wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
In an odd coincidence, on Sesame Street today the question was asked, "Can you spell A-S-S-E-T S-E-I-Z-U-R-E-S?"


The NYT isn't the courts. Are they reporting allegations? Absolute proof? Google is in my future!!


It's a newspaper.

Free to read online so why are you asking me?


They were rhetorical basically. You're post seemed like a jury was in already.
:beer: RIP mags
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1175 » by Clyde_Style » Tue Oct 2, 2018 9:30 pm

Are We Ther Yet wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Are We Ther Yet wrote:
The NYT isn't the courts. Are they reporting allegations? Absolute proof? Google is in my future!!


It's a newspaper.

Free to read online so why are you asking me?


They were rhetorical basically. You're post seemed like a jury was in already.


You mean the panel Cookie Monster is sitting on?
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,399
And1: 27,083
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1176 » by Jalen Bluntson » Tue Oct 2, 2018 9:38 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:
Are We Ther Yet wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
It's a newspaper.

Free to read online so why are you asking me?


They were rhetorical basically. You're post seemed like a jury was in already.


You mean the panel Cookie Monster is sitting on?


No. I don't.
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,319
And1: 62,455
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1177 » by HarthorneWingo » Tue Oct 2, 2018 9:48 pm

Kavanaugh holds no rights in this process. He certainly has no property right in the job of justice for SCOTUS. The President has a right to the advice and consent of the Senate on his nominations. And that's about it to my knowledge.
Free Palestine
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,932
And1: 45,604
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1178 » by GONYK » Tue Oct 2, 2018 10:42 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
There is a new accusation that is presently anonymous, but could be unmasked, that Kav and a buddy raped a girl repeatedly in the back of a car. She said he forced her to do fellatio and came in her mouth, then both raped her.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36529/released-transcript-kavanaugh-asked-about-amanda-prestigiacomo

The Senate already knew this. We'll see how comfortable they are with this kind of stuff by the time the FBI is done and more rape or abuse accusations surface.

I have no idea why you think it is likely they confirm, though they are an evil bunch so I wouldn't rule it out.


I think, given the current state of play, they are likely to confirm for 2 reasons:

1. None of the accusations have been corroborated in any way that is damning or prosecutable, and the R's see this as a war to maintain due process and precedence.

2. They know that if they don't get a judge in by mid-terms and the Dems take the House and possibly a few seats in the Senate, then they might not get another chance before the next Presidential election.

So unless something major comes out that really sticks, I see them ramming Kav through. I also think conservative Dems like Manchin will help them. The bar fight is an interesting development though. Speaks to temperament.


Due process? The confirmations are not a court room so your points are misplaced, because the exposure due to the accusations is what matters first, then you cross the bridge of investigations and indictments for rape or other crimes next.

Precedence? Whose? 200+ years of historical precedence or Merrick Garland and now this?


I'm talking about the confirmation process for a SC judge. They don't want the precedent to be set that someone can be taken down by unsubstantiated accusations.

I believe Ford to be credible. I personally think Kavanaugh could have done this and simply doesn't remember due to drunkenness.

The fact of the matter is that, as of now, every accusation is uncorroborated.

Per # 2, almost every single congressional member of the GOP has proven themselves to be purely in this for themselves. The illusion of party unity in the GOP's case is not at this point ideological other than hewing to the points of action their rich donors direct them to take. So the only calculus here is political suicide by confirming Kavanaugh or political\financial suicide by not doing their masters bidding.

Since it only takes 1 GOP senator to kill this it has become abundantly clear that Flake, Murkowski, Collins and Manchin played a game of deflection (with Flake now taunting Trump that one week of investigation will not suffice) in order to push this decision further down the road for one reason only. It is not morals. It is that they don't want to vote on Kavanaugh at all, because they don't want to vote for him personally or because their state constituency is telling them not to, but they don't want to piss off the money bags by voting NO. So I don't know where you get the notion that McConnell will get Kavanaugh approved. He cannot ram this through at this point regardless of you point about the calendar.

And if you don't think several rape or sexual misconduct accusations than can still easily morph into trials is not MAJOR, I don't know what to tell you. I know you're saying an accusation is not major to the GOP and you're right about that. But you're deeply misreading the impact of those accusations and how the social feedback nationwide has rippled through the Senate ranks in a big way already.


The R's have their own data that shows this is a galvanizing issue for them and could be closing the enthusiasm gap they were facing heading into the midterms. I think they will be willing to take the PR hit to gain a SC seat, especially if they figure that they will lose the House in November.

The bar fight is important, but not critical.

What is critical now is this and what you omitted. Kavanaugh has been a serial liar under oath to the Senate which is a federal crime. Now that the FBI has their teeth into him, that alone is a major deal that disqualifies him. Being an out of control drunk who allegedly also rapes people only at present needs firm testimony that shows he was a belligerent binge drinker to nail him for lying under oath. The FBI has that testimony now and a police report as hard evidence. The GOP has no say into whether the FBI now reports that Kavanaugh is now prosecutable for lying under oath.

Additionally, you've completely ignored that Orrin Hatch's office and perhaps multiple GOP Senators can now be investigated by the FBI for conspiracy to tamper with "due process" starting with the false lies put out that a classmate of Kavanaugh's was some kind of doppelganger Mrs. Ford mistakened for Kavanaugh. Look up Edward Whelan if that name is new to you. Primary GOP operatives played fast and loose with the truth. If the FBI proves it was directed by top GOP senators, this morphs into a forest fire. So much for due process.

And there may have been witness tampering by Kavanaugh himself against at least one of his accusers as well:

https://abovethelaw.com/2018/10/akin-gump-partner-is-the-woman-who-has-texts-that-suggest-kavanaugh-was-trying-to-discredit-ramirez-story-prior-to-publication/


Just like every other issue in this matter, there needs to be proof before anything is factored in. If you believe the FBI will uncover loads of incriminating information, that's fine. Until they do though, the Republicans have come too far to back off of confirming Kavanaugh now.
User avatar
King of Canada
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,265
And1: 13,011
Joined: Nov 03, 2005
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
 

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1179 » by King of Canada » Tue Oct 2, 2018 10:54 pm

cgmw wrote:NYT reporting Trump committed tax fraud based on over 200 of his Daddy's returns. Apparently Trump and siblings set up phony shell corps to receive gifts from daddy upwards of $243m to avoid taxes.


It’s funny because that’s basically just rich people in general.
BAF Pacers

F. Campazzo/ J. Clarkson/ K. Lewis Jr
D. Mitchell/ J. Richardson/S. Merrill
Luka/Melo
Zion/Gay/Gabriel
KAT/Kabengele

F. Mason, Jontay, J. Harris

RIP mags :beer:
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Twitter Thread on 3 Decades of Russian & Mafia Relationships with Trump 

Post#1180 » by Clyde_Style » Tue Oct 2, 2018 11:44 pm

GONYK wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
GONYK wrote:
I think, given the current state of play, they are likely to confirm for 2 reasons:

1. None of the accusations have been corroborated in any way that is damning or prosecutable, and the R's see this as a war to maintain due process and precedence.

2. They know that if they don't get a judge in by mid-terms and the Dems take the House and possibly a few seats in the Senate, then they might not get another chance before the next Presidential election.

So unless something major comes out that really sticks, I see them ramming Kav through. I also think conservative Dems like Manchin will help them. The bar fight is an interesting development though. Speaks to temperament.


Due process? The confirmations are not a court room so your points are misplaced, because the exposure due to the accusations is what matters first, then you cross the bridge of investigations and indictments for rape or other crimes next.

Precedence? Whose? 200+ years of historical precedence or Merrick Garland and now this?


I'm talking about the confirmation process for a SC judge. They don't want the precedent to be set that someone can be taken down by unsubstantiated accusations.

For partisan purposes only, so that has nothing to do with a desire for maintaining just protocols. The point of hearings is to find out if there are any potentially objectionable reasons and there are, they now are being investigated. Corroboration could require a charge, indictment, trial and conviction, but if your point about due process for nomination were true then the mere likelihood of multiple accusations of sexual offenses, some of which could result in a long-term sentence would require backing off from this nominee. Sorry, man, but this idea that if it hasn't been proven in a court of law yet invalidates the path to a nomination is silly. When you are faced with these allegations you hold off from putting someone on SCOTUS, that's the point, NOT that you must first prove it in a court of law. Not that you believe that, but I think your point is that would be the GOP tacit assumption of how to proceed.

And what I'm saying is if the FBI comes back and says there is a credible basis for prosecution for (a) lying under oath or (b) rape and other sexual offenses, then SCOTUS due process has been served and you do not push through someone because they would have to undergo a trial first. I mean what do you think a short-term FBI probe is for? It's a witness corraboration and fact-finding mission, not a prosecution. So, NO, NO, NO, Kavanaugh does not have to proven guilty of anything beyond all reasonable doubt to be disqualified even by the GOP's rotten standards.



I believe Ford to be credible. I personally think Kavanaugh could have done this and simply doesn't remember due to drunkenness.

The fact of the matter is that, as of now, every accusation is uncorroborated.

Per # 2, almost every single congressional member of the GOP has proven themselves to be purely in this for themselves. The illusion of party unity in the GOP's case is not at this point ideological other than hewing to the points of action their rich donors direct them to take. So the only calculus here is political suicide by confirming Kavanaugh or political\financial suicide by not doing their masters bidding.

Since it only takes 1 GOP senator to kill this it has become abundantly clear that Flake, Murkowski, Collins and Manchin played a game of deflection (with Flake now taunting Trump that one week of investigation will not suffice) in order to push this decision further down the road for one reason only. It is not morals. It is that they don't want to vote on Kavanaugh at all, because they don't want to vote for him personally or because their state constituency is telling them not to, but they don't want to piss off the money bags by voting NO. So I don't know where you get the notion that McConnell will get Kavanaugh approved. He cannot ram this through at this point regardless of you point about the calendar.

And if you don't think several rape or sexual misconduct accusations than can still easily morph into trials is not MAJOR, I don't know what to tell you. I know you're saying an accusation is not major to the GOP and you're right about that. But you're deeply misreading the impact of those accusations and how the social feedback nationwide has rippled through the Senate ranks in a big way already.


The R's have their own data that shows this is a galvanizing issue for them and could be closing the enthusiasm gap they were facing heading into the midterms. I think they will be willing to take the PR hit to gain a SC seat, especially if they figure that they will lose the House in November.

The bar fight is important, but not critical.

What is critical now is this and what you omitted. Kavanaugh has been a serial liar under oath to the Senate which is a federal crime. Now that the FBI has their teeth into him, that alone is a major deal that disqualifies him. Being an out of control drunk who allegedly also rapes people only at present needs firm testimony that shows he was a belligerent binge drinker to nail him for lying under oath. The FBI has that testimony now and a police report as hard evidence. The GOP has no say into whether the FBI now reports that Kavanaugh is now prosecutable for lying under oath.

Additionally, you've completely ignored that Orrin Hatch's office and perhaps multiple GOP Senators can now be investigated by the FBI for conspiracy to tamper with "due process" starting with the false lies put out that a classmate of Kavanaugh's was some kind of doppelganger Mrs. Ford mistakened for Kavanaugh. Look up Edward Whelan if that name is new to you. Primary GOP operatives played fast and loose with the truth. If the FBI proves it was directed by top GOP senators, this morphs into a forest fire. So much for due process.

And there may have been witness tampering by Kavanaugh himself against at least one of his accusers as well:

https://abovethelaw.com/2018/10/akin-gump-partner-is-the-woman-who-has-texts-that-suggest-kavanaugh-was-trying-to-discredit-ramirez-story-prior-to-publication/


Just like every other issue in this matter, there needs to be proof before anything is factored in. If you believe the FBI will uncover loads of incriminating information, that's fine. Until they do though, the Republicans have come too far to back off of confirming Kavanaugh now.

Return to New York Knicks