verbal8 wrote:For anything related to the Trump foundation or tax scams on Real Estate, it is pretty easy to give jurisdiction to New York State.
I have heard rumors about a case where federal pardons would be extended to state crimes, but this case seems different.
This article explains a little better what's at stake here.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/09/trump-pardon-orrin-hatch-supreme-court/571285/Edit:
The larger issue here is that, while any such ruling wouldn't necessarily shut everything down, shutting things down isn't the only potential avenue to success. Tying things up in court trying to clarify things for years, all while you have a significant advantage at the level of the Supreme Court is effectively a win. In this case, I'm not even sure Trump actually
wants the investigation shut down. He just doesn't want to be indicted and then ultimately convicted. That's already a messy, long drawn out play. Make it too much longer and it's pretty easy to make it irrelevant given all the other means of diverting things quickly along patrician or other lines.
Trump loves this publicity. The people turned off by it aren't people he wants to vote anyway. And people who get fed up by political corruption sometimes wind up not voting at all. And when people think of political corruption, they often see it everywhere. As president, Trump is effectively immune from prosecution. The risk increases if congress and/or the senate flip, but less so if the judiciary is in place. More than that, prosecuting Trump once he's no longer president would be extremely muddy waters because it would risk partisan prosecuting of presidents back and forth becoming the norm (be honest, you know the Republican Party as an institution is no longer above that kind of thing).