Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!!

Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Domejandro, ken6199

dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 48,886
And1: 26,313
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#41 » by dhsilv2 » Fri Oct 5, 2018 12:37 pm

Frozzy wrote:
Dominater wrote:This is why it drives me nuts when the fans of now talk about how much better then stars of today are as opposed to the stars of yesterday. The stars of today look better because of the rules that artificially inflate offense. How good would Curry or Klay look against the bad boy Pistons or Rileys Knicks?

Lmao Steph & Klay wouldn't even be in the league in the 90s


Two guys far larger and stronger than their peers at the some positions in the 90's wouldn't be in the league?
Hugi Mancura
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,908
And1: 1,149
Joined: Dec 05, 2017

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#42 » by Hugi Mancura » Fri Oct 5, 2018 12:44 pm

LAvision wrote:It's the same thing happening in the NFL. All these leagues just want the high shootout possible. Higher scores = more casuals


This is sadly true. Casual fans outnumber real fans 10 to 1 and because real fans pay their money no matter what happens in the court (they might spend their evenings in RealGM complaining about it, but still pay), so if you want more money then you need more casual fans and the best way to get it is by increasing the number of baskets and make your superstars lives more easier. Because there is two things people come to watch, other is baskets and other is stars.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 31,749
And1: 34,776
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#43 » by UcanUwill » Fri Oct 5, 2018 12:53 pm

Dominater wrote:This is why it drives me nuts when the fans of now talk about how much better then stars of today are as opposed to the stars of yesterday. The stars of today look better because of the rules that artificially inflate offense. How good would Curry or Klay look against the bad boy Pistons or Rileys Knicks?


They would still look pretty great...
NBARocks
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,794
And1: 1,507
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
Contact:
   

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#44 » by NBARocks » Fri Oct 5, 2018 12:55 pm

How many are willing to bet this gets applied only for GSW while the rest of the league continues to be grabbed and held without fouls getting called? I'm willing to bet Draymond and co. gets to grab and hold on their end without getting called for it. In fact, I'm willing to bet Lebron doesn't get "freedom of movement" because he's so big and strong he doesn't need it. :roll:
Hugi Mancura
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,908
And1: 1,149
Joined: Dec 05, 2017

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#45 » by Hugi Mancura » Fri Oct 5, 2018 12:58 pm

PistolPeteJR wrote:
Hugi Mancura wrote:I think this is great change. They just give off the ball players same rights as ball handler all ready had as they should. People should be equal in front of the law (or front of basketball rules in this case). Does this cause the offense to increase? Sure it does, it makes scoring easier, so expect increase of points and shooting%'s on most teams. Couple years the situation has been 'you can't touch the ball handler, but off the ball you can do anything you want'. This created a situation where ball movement and team oriented offense suffered greatly and teams were almost forced to play iso ball or p&r. But because there is only a limited number of good iso/p&r players teams who didn't have those players pretty much had only one choice, tanking to find one. Now if they really follow this it gives teams that have better ball movement to become better, and you don't necessary need stars to become good. You just might need really good game plan with good plays and you might actually challenge teams with multiple stars.

People who are against this would you really like to see that kind of holding they do off the ball to happen on ball handler? Two arms around offensive player. Even Lebron couldn't score in that situation. If you don't want to see this on the ball situation why you want see this kind of holding off the ball? Only reason I think is that people are afraid that GSW will dominate even more and teams like Lebron and Houston will lose their fighting change against them (or Boston). Unless Lebron have stated he want's to play this year more off the ball, which would mean this rule would make Lebron scoring easier.


No, the problem with this is simple: if you're going to call fouls like this, then call fouls in favour of people packing it in the paint, getting mauled night after night. Because they're bigger, it's okay, but because these offball shooters a la Curry, Redick, Thompson, etc., are smaller guys, they aim to protect David while largely ignoring the beatings Goliath takes regularly.


I think bigger players will start to become off the ball shooters more and more. All ready there were couple last year.

This mauling thing. This has been in basketball from the beginning or atl east several decades. I think this has nothing to do with this rule change. Big guys have always been allowed to maul each other, but they have also been allowed to give back. If you really watch those big's lowering their shoulders, hitting defensive player with it and getting away with it (if you don't over do it). If you see same thing to happen with smaller guys it will be called as an offensive foul. This has always been like this and because of that I wouldn't mix it with this rule change. I think this rule change has nothing to do with size, but it is about giving off the ball players same rights as ball handler. Which is one of the base rules of basketball or life, but when they added the no hand check rule they didn't follow it by giving rights to off the ball players. You can't hold big buys after this any more than you are allowed to hold smaller guys, but sure smaller guys do happen to be benefactor of this rule more than bigger players.

Also people need to remember that referees call what they see. When someone in doing his stuff in a crowded paint it is harder to see fouls. Referees don't have the same bird eye view as we do. They are professionals so they have skill to go to right place to see things better, but basketball is a very fast sport and they can't be all over the place all the time.
User avatar
Mister Ze
RealGM
Posts: 13,082
And1: 23,284
Joined: Jul 01, 2011
 

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#46 » by Mister Ze » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:01 pm

I have no problem with this rule as long as they call the moving screens/illegal off-ball screens then too.

Otherwise this is BS. Freedom of movement for offence and defense
PistolPeteJR
RealGM
Posts: 11,322
And1: 10,167
Joined: Jun 14, 2017
 

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#47 » by PistolPeteJR » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:01 pm

Hugi Mancura wrote:
PistolPeteJR wrote:
Hugi Mancura wrote:I think this is great change. They just give off the ball players same rights as ball handler all ready had as they should. People should be equal in front of the law (or front of basketball rules in this case). Does this cause the offense to increase? Sure it does, it makes scoring easier, so expect increase of points and shooting%'s on most teams. Couple years the situation has been 'you can't touch the ball handler, but off the ball you can do anything you want'. This created a situation where ball movement and team oriented offense suffered greatly and teams were almost forced to play iso ball or p&r. But because there is only a limited number of good iso/p&r players teams who didn't have those players pretty much had only one choice, tanking to find one. Now if they really follow this it gives teams that have better ball movement to become better, and you don't necessary need stars to become good. You just might need really good game plan with good plays and you might actually challenge teams with multiple stars.

People who are against this would you really like to see that kind of holding they do off the ball to happen on ball handler? Two arms around offensive player. Even Lebron couldn't score in that situation. If you don't want to see this on the ball situation why you want see this kind of holding off the ball? Only reason I think is that people are afraid that GSW will dominate even more and teams like Lebron and Houston will lose their fighting change against them (or Boston). Unless Lebron have stated he want's to play this year more off the ball, which would mean this rule would make Lebron scoring easier.


No, the problem with this is simple: if you're going to call fouls like this, then call fouls in favour of people packing it in the paint, getting mauled night after night. Because they're bigger, it's okay, but because these offball shooters a la Curry, Redick, Thompson, etc., are smaller guys, they aim to protect David while largely ignoring the beatings Goliath takes regularly.


I think bigger players will start to become off the ball shooters more and more. All ready there were couple last year.

This mauling thing. This has been in basketball from the beginning or atl east several decades. I think this has nothing to do with this rule change. Big guys have always been allowed to maul each other, but they have also been allowed to give back. If you really watch those big's lowering their shoulders, hitting defensive player with it and getting away with it (if you don't over do it). If you see same thing to happen with smaller guys it will be called as an offensive foul. This has always been like this and because of that I wouldn't mix it with this rule change. I think this rule change has nothing to do with size, but it is about giving off the ball players same rights as ball handler. Which is one of the base rules of basketball or life, but when they added the no hand check rule they didn't follow it by giving rights to off the ball players. You can't hold big buys after this any more than you are allowed to hold smaller guys, but sure smaller guys do happen to be benefactor of this rule more than bigger players.

Also people need to remember that referees call what they see. When someone in doing his stuff in a crowded paint it is harder to see fouls. Referees don't have the same bird eye view as we do. They are professionals so they have skill to go to right place to see things better, but basketball is a very fast sport and they can't be all over the place all the time.


I am aware it has been happening forever. That's the point. The NBA wants to clamp down on offball physical play, but not in-the-paint physical play. One gets penalized, one doesn't. See the issue?

In addition, guys inside definitely do not get away with physical play on smaller guys (ie. IT2).

Finally, this does not take into account guys that drive more often than not and don't get calls nearly as often as they ought to, when it's clearly not as simple as marking it up to "margin for error" on the refs part (ie. LeBron).
Johnny Fontane
General Manager
Posts: 7,922
And1: 13,745
Joined: Jun 09, 2018

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#48 » by Johnny Fontane » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:03 pm

Yup I've noticed this from the first preseason game.

Funny that this wasn't really talked about with the other rule changes. Guess the league knew it wasn't going to be popular among fans. Pretty obvious they made this for not only the Warriors and three point shooters across the league but also another perk to protect stars.

This league is turning into a soft kid's game very quickly whereas it used to be a men's league
Hugi Mancura
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,908
And1: 1,149
Joined: Dec 05, 2017

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#49 » by Hugi Mancura » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:08 pm

NBARocks wrote:How many are willing to bet this gets applied only for GSW while the rest of the league continues to be grabbed and held without fouls getting called? I'm willing to bet Draymond and co. gets to grab and hold on their end without getting called for it. In fact, I'm willing to bet Lebron doesn't get "freedom of movement" because he's so big and strong he doesn't need it. :roll:


Or maybe they decided to add this rule because Lebron has said he want's to play more of the ball and thus this rule would help Lebron to succeed more. You can as easily claim NBA didn't do this rule change earlier because they wanted Lebron to win championship with Cavs, but now he wants to play off the ball, so they make rule change to ease his life. With this fair rule Cavs would have never won GSW. NBA will never be against superstars or big market teams, so I think Lakers are safe, but so is GSW.
User avatar
jazzfan1971
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 39,311
And1: 8,556
Joined: Jul 16, 2001
Location: Salt Lake City
 

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#50 » by jazzfan1971 » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:14 pm

My guess is that they want the game to be more aesthetically pleasing. The trend to switching defenses is making the game uglier. They probably wan't to stop that trend and think this will help.

My guess: It only causes the game to get uglier as it's just more FTs and not much else.
"Thibs called back and wanted more picks," said Jorge Sedano. "And Pat Riley, literally, I was told, called him a mother-bleeper and hung up the phone."
User avatar
spacemonkey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,551
And1: 8,661
Joined: Nov 24, 2004

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#51 » by spacemonkey » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:17 pm

If you're going to call the grabbing, you need to call the moving screens like at bare minimum.
User avatar
smartyz456
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,408
And1: 2,692
Joined: Apr 20, 2014
 

Re: Paul Pierce praises 'freedom of movement' rules, says offense is more fun to watch 

Post#52 » by smartyz456 » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:21 pm

just furthers the fact that pierce is my favorite celtic (blech. but he's from inglewood so better than bird, mchale or russell i guess)

no more low post players and more perimeter players dominating the league

it's how the game is supposed to play after all

more exciting too unlike boring old "dump the ball to big man and post up"
Hugi Mancura
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,908
And1: 1,149
Joined: Dec 05, 2017

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#53 » by Hugi Mancura » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:22 pm

PistolPeteJR wrote:
Hugi Mancura wrote:
PistolPeteJR wrote:
No, the problem with this is simple: if you're going to call fouls like this, then call fouls in favour of people packing it in the paint, getting mauled night after night. Because they're bigger, it's okay, but because these offball shooters a la Curry, Redick, Thompson, etc., are smaller guys, they aim to protect David while largely ignoring the beatings Goliath takes regularly.


I think bigger players will start to become off the ball shooters more and more. All ready there were couple last year.

This mauling thing. This has been in basketball from the beginning or atl east several decades. I think this has nothing to do with this rule change. Big guys have always been allowed to maul each other, but they have also been allowed to give back. If you really watch those big's lowering their shoulders, hitting defensive player with it and getting away with it (if you don't over do it). If you see same thing to happen with smaller guys it will be called as an offensive foul. This has always been like this and because of that I wouldn't mix it with this rule change. I think this rule change has nothing to do with size, but it is about giving off the ball players same rights as ball handler. Which is one of the base rules of basketball or life, but when they added the no hand check rule they didn't follow it by giving rights to off the ball players. You can't hold big buys after this any more than you are allowed to hold smaller guys, but sure smaller guys do happen to be benefactor of this rule more than bigger players.

Also people need to remember that referees call what they see. When someone in doing his stuff in a crowded paint it is harder to see fouls. Referees don't have the same bird eye view as we do. They are professionals so they have skill to go to right place to see things better, but basketball is a very fast sport and they can't be all over the place all the time.


I am aware it has been happening forever. That's the point. The NBA wants to clamp down on offball physical play, but not in-the-paint physical play. One gets penalized, one doesn't. See the issue?

In addition, guys inside definitely do not get away with physical play on smaller guys (ie. IT2).

Finally, this does not take into account guys that drive more often than not and don't get calls nearly as often as they ought to, when it's clearly not as simple as marking it up to "margin for error" on the refs part (ie. LeBron).


I do agree that big vs small, that's why I added don't over do it, maybe should have been more exact with it. Was mainly comparing big vs big, which is what it most of the time is and there you receive hits, but can also give back.

On the driving thing I disagree, but mainly I disagree how they call it in NBA. If offensive player causes the contact to happen, then it's not a defensive players foul. Yes, when Lebron drives there is a lot of contact, but because Lebron knows he is stronger he is also the person who initiates the contact 90% of the time. So how I see the game he should not get those calls (not so sure with NBA rules though). But also Lebron is allowed to give the mauling too. He uses his off the ball arm to make room more than most of the players in NBA and he very rarely get called for it. So maybe this is referees way of saying, yes we know they foul you, but at the same time we allow you to foul them back. Driving is hard to call, when defense has position and when not, also rules are different if you are help defender or original defender.
User avatar
mccluskey
Rookie
Posts: 1,006
And1: 635
Joined: Jun 29, 2005

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#54 » by mccluskey » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:23 pm

CeltsfanSinceBirth wrote:Why stop there? Might as well just put in a new rule that forbids defenders from crossing the halfcourt line.


nzahir wrote:Jesus man, this league is going to ****

Basically impossible to play defense now

If they are going to call that, then they better start calling MOVING SCREENS



agree with both of you :beer:
Karate Diop
General Manager
Posts: 9,220
And1: 11,102
Joined: May 19, 2017
 

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#55 » by Karate Diop » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:25 pm

In a vaccum it makes sense, but officiating this consistently - if you're making it a point of emphasis is going to be extraordinarily difficult.
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,415
And1: 13,495
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#56 » by Effigy » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:27 pm

CeltsfanSinceBirth wrote:Why stop there? Might as well just put in a new rule that forbids defenders from crossing the halfcourt line.


It's not the NFL. You're not supposed to be touching the other player.

I wish they'd get much better about calling offensive fouls though. That stupid garbage where an offensive player pretends to go up and then leans into the defender and shoots should be an offensive foul as the offensive player is initiating the contact.
Johnny Fontane
General Manager
Posts: 7,922
And1: 13,745
Joined: Jun 09, 2018

Re: Paul Pierce praises 'freedom of movement' rules, says offense is more fun to watch 

Post#57 » by Johnny Fontane » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:27 pm

Typical casual fan's line of thinking with Paul Pierce saying it's good for the game
PistolPeteJR
RealGM
Posts: 11,322
And1: 10,167
Joined: Jun 14, 2017
 

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#58 » by PistolPeteJR » Fri Oct 5, 2018 1:45 pm

Hugi Mancura wrote:
PistolPeteJR wrote:
Hugi Mancura wrote:
I think bigger players will start to become off the ball shooters more and more. All ready there were couple last year.

This mauling thing. This has been in basketball from the beginning or atl east several decades. I think this has nothing to do with this rule change. Big guys have always been allowed to maul each other, but they have also been allowed to give back. If you really watch those big's lowering their shoulders, hitting defensive player with it and getting away with it (if you don't over do it). If you see same thing to happen with smaller guys it will be called as an offensive foul. This has always been like this and because of that I wouldn't mix it with this rule change. I think this rule change has nothing to do with size, but it is about giving off the ball players same rights as ball handler. Which is one of the base rules of basketball or life, but when they added the no hand check rule they didn't follow it by giving rights to off the ball players. You can't hold big buys after this any more than you are allowed to hold smaller guys, but sure smaller guys do happen to be benefactor of this rule more than bigger players.

Also people need to remember that referees call what they see. When someone in doing his stuff in a crowded paint it is harder to see fouls. Referees don't have the same bird eye view as we do. They are professionals so they have skill to go to right place to see things better, but basketball is a very fast sport and they can't be all over the place all the time.


I am aware it has been happening forever. That's the point. The NBA wants to clamp down on offball physical play, but not in-the-paint physical play. One gets penalized, one doesn't. See the issue?

In addition, guys inside definitely do not get away with physical play on smaller guys (ie. IT2).

Finally, this does not take into account guys that drive more often than not and don't get calls nearly as often as they ought to, when it's clearly not as simple as marking it up to "margin for error" on the refs part (ie. LeBron).


I do agree that big vs small, that's why I added don't over do it, maybe should have been more exact with it. Was mainly comparing big vs big, which is what it most of the time is and there you receive hits, but can also give back.

On the driving thing I disagree, but mainly I disagree how they call it in NBA. If offensive player causes the contact to happen, then it's not a defensive players foul. Yes, when Lebron drives there is a lot of contact, but because Lebron knows he is stronger he is also the person who initiates the contact 90% of the time. So how I see the game he should not get those calls (not so sure with NBA rules though). But also Lebron is allowed to give the mauling too. He uses his off the ball arm to make room more than most of the players in NBA and he very rarely get called for it. So maybe this is referees way of saying, yes we know they foul you, but at the same time we allow you to foul them back. Driving is hard to call, when defense has position and when not, also rules are different if you are help defender or original defender.


I agree with the off-arm thing that literally just about every player that drives in the NBA uses it. It just looks more apparent with LeBron because he's so strong and players also take advantage of that and sell it more. But initiating contact and a foul are not always synonymous, so I don't necessarily agree with you there.
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 41,836
And1: 23,238
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#59 » by ATLTimekeeper » Fri Oct 5, 2018 2:09 pm

This is going to be one of those double standards where Steph and Klay get an advantage and the refs are too afraid to call it against Draymond and Iggy.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 23,989
And1: 1,870
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

Re: Refs new "freedom of movement" rule bans defenders from grabbing off ball cutters like Curry and Klay!!! 

Post#60 » by Ballings7 » Fri Oct 5, 2018 2:14 pm

WarFan wrote:Every year the league talks about emphasizing some new calls and the refs call a bunch of fouls for a week or two and then basically forget about it.

Much ado about nothing.


This is very much true... same kind of thing happened with the rip-through move on the other side of the ball, a few years ago... like Harden, Durant, Kawhi, etc. does it get really get called that often? No.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics

Return to The General Board