DCZards wrote:As a high school jr. before switching to forward, Brown was like the second or third ranked PG in his class. So, yes, his vision and passing are legit and are probably a big reason why the Zards (and apparently other teams like the Spurs) ranked him higher than the pundits who do the mock drafts...
Just noticed the above.
Zards, any time anyone here claims to know how various teams ranked players they didn't pick you are quick to point out that in fact they don't & can't know that. You ask whether the person making the claim was in on conversations those teams had, etc. &, in a sense, that's fair.
Now, you've just done the same thing you complain about. You have no idea where any team except the Wizards ranked Tony Brown Jr. -- other than knowing (obviously) that each of the 14 teams that picked before the Wizards had someone else rated higher than Brown.
Not only that, but you proceed to use this "knowledge" (which you don't & can't have) to cast a further aspersion on the, as you call them mockingly, "pundits," who had him ranked lower than #15 in their mock drafts. That's rhetorically clever, but it just compounds your invented claim to knowledge.
In candor, my friend, am I not correct? Is this not exactly what you've done here?

DCZards wrote:...No way is Brown as good a passer as Wall, but I expect it to soon become apparent that he's the team's second best passer and playmaker.
That would be great! But, if that is "to soon become apparent," how come you don't want to give him minutes? I'd say we could use that set of skills, wouldn't you?
