Butler has requested a trade, the saga continues
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
K4P
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,382
- And1: 17,112
- Joined: Aug 27, 2017
-
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
Man, JRich and waiters is an awful deal for us. People need to stop putting so much faith in a player who at best is a supporting piece. I don’t care about Butler being disgruntled, that just isn’t a good deal at all. Not to mention we also get the pleasure of having 11 million dollars of dead weight on our roster
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
twix2500
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,892
- And1: 28,160
- Joined: Dec 25, 2003
-
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
I'm not a big fan of Waiters. But he will be your best swing player by far. He is only 26. He has changed his game for the better since being here. He is a good defender and contributes as a point. His major problem is he continues to shoot when he is cold. If he focused more as a cutter and snowbirds plays he will be damn good. He is better than Wiggins.WolvesLife wrote:Man, JRich and waiters is an awful deal for us. People need to stop putting so much faith in a player who at best is a supporting piece. I don’t care about Butler being disgruntled, that just isn’t a good deal at all. Not to mention we also get the pleasure of having 11 million dollars of dead weight on our roster
But I understand, he has been hurt and he needs to prove he is healthy and his play on the court will be productive. The trade probably will not be revisited until JJ and Waiters show what they can do.
Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
Dewey
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,903
- And1: 1,072
- Joined: May 22, 2001
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
WolvesLife wrote:Man, JRich and waiters is an awful deal for us. People need to stop putting so much faith in a player who at best is a supporting piece. I don’t care about Butler being disgruntled, that just isn’t a good deal at all. Not to mention we also get the pleasure of having 11 million dollars of dead weight on our roster
apparently dead OVERweight
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,414
- And1: 19,468
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
Dewey wrote:WolvesLife wrote:Man, JRich and waiters is an awful deal for us. People need to stop putting so much faith in a player who at best is a supporting piece. I don’t care about Butler being disgruntled, that just isn’t a good deal at all. Not to mention we also get the pleasure of having 11 million dollars of dead weight on our roster
apparently dead OVERweight
LOL! Where’s that current picture of him, with his fat spilling out over the armpits of his jersey?
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,414
- And1: 19,468
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
We know Thibs loves Jimmy, and Taylor ordered him to find a deal, then stepped back.
Do you think that the fact that the Heat offer is so low (really? Eat three years of Waiters?) is just Thibs stalling to tell Taylor he’s talking trade, and the Heat price is no reflection on the real price he’d sell for?
$63 mil for three years of Waiters-Richardson production and a pick in the 20’s? I don’t know if that’s positive value.
Do you think that the fact that the Heat offer is so low (really? Eat three years of Waiters?) is just Thibs stalling to tell Taylor he’s talking trade, and the Heat price is no reflection on the real price he’d sell for?
$63 mil for three years of Waiters-Richardson production and a pick in the 20’s? I don’t know if that’s positive value.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
alabamawolf
- Senior
- Posts: 591
- And1: 321
- Joined: Dec 31, 2011
-
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
twix2500 wrote:I'm not a big fan of Waiters. But he will be your best swing player by far. He is only 26. He has changed his game for the better since being here. He is a good defender and contributes as a point. His major problem is he continues to shoot when he is cold. If he focused more as a cutter and snowbirds plays he will be damn good. He is better than Wiggins.WolvesLife wrote:Man, JRich and waiters is an awful deal for us. People need to stop putting so much faith in a player who at best is a supporting piece. I don’t care about Butler being disgruntled, that just isn’t a good deal at all. Not to mention we also get the pleasure of having 11 million dollars of dead weight on our roster
But I understand, he has been hurt and he needs to prove he is healthy and his play on the court will be productive. The trade probably will not be revisited until JJ and Waiters show what they can do.
Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
Waiters is terrible. He tricked Miami into thinking he was a changed player during a contract year. As soon as he got paid he went back to being lazy Dion.
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
K4P
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,382
- And1: 17,112
- Joined: Aug 27, 2017
-
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
twix2500 wrote:I'm not a big fan of Waiters. But he will be your best swing player by far. He is only 26. He has changed his game for the better since being here. He is a good defender and contributes as a point. His major problem is he continues to shoot when he is cold. If he focused more as a cutter and snowbirds plays he will be damn good. He is better than Wiggins.WolvesLife wrote:Man, JRich and waiters is an awful deal for us. People need to stop putting so much faith in a player who at best is a supporting piece. I don’t care about Butler being disgruntled, that just isn’t a good deal at all. Not to mention we also get the pleasure of having 11 million dollars of dead weight on our roster
But I understand, he has been hurt and he needs to prove he is healthy and his play on the court will be productive. The trade probably will not be revisited until JJ and Waiters show what they can do.
Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
I agree he COULD be useful, but I don’t think the Wolves have a spot for another streaky shooter. If he could raise his value in these early games it would make his contract a little less hard to swallow. But for now, he is dead weight
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
Calinks
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 50,344
- And1: 17,270
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
If Jimmy was doing this stuff with the teams best interest at heart that would be one thing. But he's not. He's not trying to work with the wolves moving forward. He's trying to jump ship. Paul George is acting like Jimmy is molding the guys for years to come. He's trying to leave ASAP. That's a key difference between him acting out and going off than guys like Kobe, etc. They were doing it to push their team and build towards winning.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
- Heat_Fan_87
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,876
- And1: 22,412
- Joined: Aug 09, 2012
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
you guys know your situation better than me, taking back waiters would suck. but jrich and a first instead of losing butler for nothing is a pretty decent deal. waiters deal hurts but rich making half what he could.
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,414
- And1: 19,468
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
WolvesLife wrote:twix2500 wrote:I'm not a big fan of Waiters. But he will be your best swing player by far. He is only 26. He has changed his game for the better since being here. He is a good defender and contributes as a point. His major problem is he continues to shoot when he is cold. If he focused more as a cutter and snowbirds plays he will be damn good. He is better than Wiggins.WolvesLife wrote:Man, JRich and waiters is an awful deal for us. People need to stop putting so much faith in a player who at best is a supporting piece. I don’t care about Butler being disgruntled, that just isn’t a good deal at all. Not to mention we also get the pleasure of having 11 million dollars of dead weight on our roster
But I understand, he has been hurt and he needs to prove he is healthy and his play on the court will be productive. The trade probably will not be revisited until JJ and Waiters show what they can do.
Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
I agree he COULD be useful, but I don’t think the Wolves have a spot for another streaky shooter. If he could raise his value in these early games it would make his contract a little less hard to swallow. But for now, he is dead weight
Richardson, Wiggins (when he’s not the 3, always plays big minutes) and probably 1st round pick Josh Okogi would all get minutes over Waiters. Heck, Thibs wants to play Derrick Rose at the 2 as well.
I see Waiters sitting on our bench for three years, eating $12 mil a year.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
twix2500
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,892
- And1: 28,160
- Joined: Dec 25, 2003
-
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
No that is not what happened. He was playing hurt, and didn't elect to have surgery when he got injured. The Heat put an incentive clause if he doesn't play so many games, he loses 1.1 mill off that yr. It didn't heal on its own and he couldn't play through it. So he finally got the surgery and lost money. So there was incentive for him to play.alabamawolf wrote:twix2500 wrote:I'm not a big fan of Waiters. But he will be your best swing player by far. He is only 26. He has changed his game for the better since being here. He is a good defender and contributes as a point. His major problem is he continues to shoot when he is cold. If he focused more as a cutter and snowbirds plays he will be damn good. He is better than Wiggins.WolvesLife wrote:Man, JRich and waiters is an awful deal for us. People need to stop putting so much faith in a player who at best is a supporting piece. I don’t care about Butler being disgruntled, that just isn’t a good deal at all. Not to mention we also get the pleasure of having 11 million dollars of dead weight on our roster
But I understand, he has been hurt and he needs to prove he is healthy and his play on the court will be productive. The trade probably will not be revisited until JJ and Waiters show what they can do.
Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
Waiters is terrible. He tricked Miami into thinking he was a changed player during a contract year. As soon as he got paid he went back to being lazy Dion.
Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
K4P
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,382
- And1: 17,112
- Joined: Aug 27, 2017
-
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
Man, I really hope Thibs is prioritizing bringing in Defenders to replace Jimmy. I feel like Minnesota would actually be decent if they had better spacing and half decent defense. It would make it easier to run through Towns and use Wiggins as a slasher
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,414
- And1: 19,468
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
Heat_Fan_87 wrote:you guys know your situation better than me, taking back waiters would suck. but jrich and a first instead of losing butler for nothing is a pretty decent deal. waiters deal hurts but rich making half what he could.
I like Richardson, but I don’t think he is a $20 mil a year player yet, but maybe someday. He is 25, so I would have hoped to see more to put him in the $20 mil a year club.
Let me ask you this. Do you think that the package of Richardson and Waiters is worth?:
2018-19. $20.9 mil
2019-20. $22.2 mil
2020-21. $23.5 mil
——————————-
2018-21. $66.6 mil
It feels like If Josh plays well, he takes minutes and value away from Waiters.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
- PharmD
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,964
- And1: 5,559
- Joined: Aug 21, 2015
-
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
Lowe and JVG podcast about how ridiculous Jimmy is acting.
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
twix2500
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,892
- And1: 28,160
- Joined: Dec 25, 2003
-
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
shrink wrote:Heat_Fan_87 wrote:you guys know your situation better than me, taking back waiters would suck. but jrich and a first instead of losing butler for nothing is a pretty decent deal. waiters deal hurts but rich making half what he could.
I like Richardson, but I don’t think he is a $20 mil a year player yet, but maybe someday. He is 25, so I would have hoped to see more to put him in the $20 mil a year club.
Let me ask you this. Do you think that the package of Richardson and Waiters is worth?:
2018-19. $20.9 mil
2019-20. $22.2 mil
2020-21. $23.5 mil
——————————-
2018-21. $66.6 mil
It feels like If Josh plays well, he takes minutes and value away from Waiters.
Why are you focused on the total after 3 yrs. That money is gonna be spent anyways. If Waiters is healthy and if they just become good role players they will be under paid. 10 mill per contract gets you very little in free agency, especially 3 yrs from now. Both of these guys will be entering their prime 27 and 28
And Waiter and JRich skill set complement each other. They do not take away from each other.
Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
- Heat_Fan_87
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,876
- And1: 22,412
- Joined: Aug 09, 2012
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
shrink wrote:Heat_Fan_87 wrote:you guys know your situation better than me, taking back waiters would suck. but jrich and a first instead of losing butler for nothing is a pretty decent deal. waiters deal hurts but rich making half what he could.
I like Richardson, but I don’t think he is a $20 mil a year player yet, but maybe someday. He is 25, so I would have hoped to see more to put him in the $20 mil a year club.
Let me ask you this. Do you think that the package of Richardson and Waiters is worth?:
2018-19. $20.9 mil
2019-20. $22.2 mil
2020-21. $23.5 mil
——————————-
2018-21. $66.6 mil
It feels like If Josh plays well, he takes minutes and value away from Waiters.
i dont beleive your team would have money to upgrade at all if butler walked away. so the question should be, over teh next 3 years, would you rather just lose butler and rely on cap space(dont have it) to improve?
when you dont have cap space, dont worry about the money. butler walking gets you nothing. jrich and a first is better than nothing, waiters might surprise, he might suck but as i said.
i dont see the alternative as you guys have 20mil to spend on some other player if butler walk.
is jrich, waiters and a first rounder better than not being able to do anything until 2021?
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
- PharmD
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,964
- And1: 5,559
- Joined: Aug 21, 2015
-
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
Heat_Fan_87 wrote:shrink wrote:Heat_Fan_87 wrote:
is jrich, waiters and a first rounder better than not being able to do anything until 2021?

Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,414
- And1: 19,468
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
twix2500 wrote:shrink wrote:Heat_Fan_87 wrote:you guys know your situation better than me, taking back waiters would suck. but jrich and a first instead of losing butler for nothing is a pretty decent deal. waiters deal hurts but rich making half what he could.
I like Richardson, but I don’t think he is a $20 mil a year player yet, but maybe someday. He is 25, so I would have hoped to see more to put him in the $20 mil a year club.
Let me ask you this. Do you think that the package of Richardson and Waiters is worth?:
2018-19. $20.9 mil
2019-20. $22.2 mil
2020-21. $23.5 mil
——————————-
2018-21. $66.6 mil
It feels like If Josh plays well, he takes minutes and value away from Waiters.
Why are you focused on the total after 3 yrs. That money is gonna be spent anyways. If Waiters is healthy and if they just become good role players they will be under paid. 10 mill per contract gets you very little in free agency, especially 3 yrs from now. Both of these guys will be entering their prime 27 and 28
And Waiter and JRich skill set complement each other. They do not take away from each other.
Doing nothing means the Wolves get that much salary in payroll relief the next two years. If they move Teague, MIN will have cap space next year too, and can devote it to other players. Richardson and Waiters are under contract for 3-4 years.
Thibs plays his starters, so Richardson would get minutes. I don’t see minutes for Waiters.
Mainly though, I’m trying to gauge the quality of the offer. If that package makes that much money, is that positive value. I’d be more in the neutral camp. We have a good feeling about the value of positive players, but we don’t evaluate negative players that well.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
Calinks
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 50,344
- And1: 17,270
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
-
SO_MONEY
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,799
- And1: 1,032
- Joined: Sep 11, 2009
-
Re: Butler has requested a trade part III Practice
If the deal were only to be Richardson and a 1st, that is one thing, including Waiters is another. Richardson and a 1st is an OKAY deal, with Waiters it is a net negitive move. One or more picks would need to be attached to just Waiters to move him and Minnesota is not getting that value. It is an easy NO. Better letting walk.Heat_Fan_87 wrote:you guys know your situation better than me, taking back waiters would suck. but jrich and a first instead of losing butler for nothing is a pretty decent deal. waiters deal hurts but rich making half what he could.
Sent from my LGMS428 using Tapatalk
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves



