spearsy23 wrote:bondom34 wrote:slick_watts wrote:
i seriously don't get how this is what you're taking away from my comments on this.
1 ) one game doesn't make anything 'official'. you'd agree with this in any other context.
2 ) his draft position is why it would tank his value if he were to be usurped in the rotation so soon by hamidou diallo. his draft position and age is also why he still has a wide development range. i wouldn't mind starting alex abrines. or tlc. or anyone else but diallo-- that would be a strong signal from the team that they do not believe in terrance ferguson. maybe you do or don't, or maybe the thunder do or don't. there's just no reason to rush and tank his value so completely because of a preseason mancrush.
i don't even like terrance ferguson. one game against the warriors didn't change my opinion one way or another though, and make anything 'official'. that's nuts.
1. Yeah, I'd agree there, but it going along with everything I already thought is furthering my idea.
2. I'd rather them go for winning games instead of worrying about the trade value of a guy who I don't think becomes a good rotation player.
How many more games do you think they win with diallo playing over ferguson?
Maybe a couple, and you develop him more. I've been very clear that I don't think Ferguson ever becomes an NBA player from day 1.















