Fischella wrote:His main calling card is D, esp 1on1 at this point, but also switchability due to size and frame, and shot-making for that size, on the move, pull-up etc, he has shown that imo, even if team D hasn't been good (expected honestly), and he isn't creating for others, which well, he never has and his role as a finisher for UNC isn't conductive to do so either
I think he is a top5 prospect on that alone, I mean Hunter is a top10 prospect imo, and he is old and offers similar stuff (worse athlete, worse shooter, better D)
Yeah, Nas had knocks for daydreaming at times as an off the ball defender, but it was his 1-on-1 D & versatility that made him exciting as a wing-stopper that you could throw on your opponent's star to lock them up. And though he's shown that he still hasn't cleaned up his team D as much as you'd like him to by his prime, he hasn't yet had much chance to show of what he can do as a 1-on-1 stopper against an elite wing. He'll certainly get his chances to show this part of his game by season's end, so this is a question that should be addressed, but I haven't seen anything to raise much concern on this front to this point.
And though I have my gripes with how he's being used offensively, playmaking was never a big selling point for him like it was for the Duke trio, and he has gotten to show off some of the various shots he can knock down. His handle will need to improve to be a star in the NBA, but his pull-up game, athleticism, length & strength should open a lot of things up for him even if that handle never becomes elite.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!