payitforward wrote:
Overall, it's fair to say that because Rivers had one of his best games while Sato had quite a sub-par game, Austin Rivers was just slightly more productive vs. the Pacers than Tomas Satoransky.
That was my one and only point, pif. And you obviously agree with it.
No need for the lecture on why Sato is the better player, having the better season. I know that. I was talking about the Indy game...and the Indy game only, which I thought was pretty obvious, especially given the thread were in.