1996 Barry Bonds Vs. 2007 A-Rod

User avatar
brewcityboii
Rookie
Posts: 1,128
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 28, 2007
Location: BRETT FAVRE >> Any other QB in NFL History!!!

1996 Barry Bonds Vs. 2007 A-Rod 

Post#1 » by brewcityboii » Tue Aug 14, 2007 4:57 pm

Bonds
517AB 122R 159H 27(2B) 3(3B) 42HR 129RBI 151BB 76SO
40SB 7CS .308BA .461OBP .615SLG 1.076OPS :bowdown:

A-Rod
430AB 107R 129H 26(2B) 0(3B) 39HR 114RBI 68BB 88SO 14SB 2CS .300BA .407OBP .633SLG 1.040OPS :bowdown:


So who ya got.

I have to go with Bonds for 3 reasons.
1.Stole Bases
2.Walks/OBP
3.Damn it is to close I say both
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#2 » by Bleeding Green » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:10 pm

Bonds so very easily. I don't see the argument for A-Rod unless you think his playing third makes up for Bonds being significantly better at the plate.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#3 » by Basketball Jesus » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:18 pm

WARP3

Bonds 1996: 12.7
ARod 2007: 12.4


EqA

Bonds 1996: .362
ARod 2007: .349

Interesting how close the WARP3 numbers are. ARod almost catches up to Bonds with his fielding.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
Pierce 4 3
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,710
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Location: Wherever there is money to steal

 

Post#4 » by Pierce 4 3 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:44 pm

Bonds kills all
risktaker91
Banned User
Posts: 2,487
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 18, 2007

 

Post#5 » by risktaker91 » Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:30 am

Bonds. A-Rod will have more HRs and RBIs though.
backer55
Senior
Posts: 725
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 29, 2007

 

Post#6 » by backer55 » Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:10 am

.
Bonds has had many great years, particularly after his 4th season in the bigs.
During his 5th, he finally started to get more BB than S.Outs. I don't know how much importance you guys put on this ratio but it's one of the first that i look for.
Getting away from the thread question but thought i'd share one of his better years and not too long ago. Bonds knees were bothering him this season and he had surgery on them the following year.

2004 season stat's.

ab.....R.. .H...2b..3b...HR..RBI...BB..SO..SB...OBP...SLG....OPS....AVE
373.129.135. 27..3.. 45.. 101..232..41.. 6. .609.. .812 .1.421. .362

Beside the very fine Batting Average, OBP, SLG and outragious OPS, one glaring stat pops right out, 232 base on balls. Of corse everyone knows not to pitch to Bonds when he is hot and hot he was this year. Many are quick to point out that Barry spiked out of nowhere in 2001 with 73 dingers. In reality, if pitched to before and especially several years after with maybe half the BB's, There is no reason to believe that he would not have hit in the neighborhood of 70 more often.

For the year on this thread... Bonds over A-Rod , I'd take em both!

.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#7 » by Basketball Jesus » Wed Aug 15, 2007 12:24 pm

This Barry Bonds guys sounds intriguing. Can you tell us more about him?
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#8 » by 34Celtic » Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:37 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:This Barry Bonds guys sounds intriguing. Can you tell us more about him?


I think his dad and godfather were pretty good at one point, thats about all I can tell you though.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
mets87
Senior
Posts: 671
And1: 0
Joined: May 26, 2007

 

Post#9 » by mets87 » Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:19 pm

.362 eqa lmfaooo ridiculous
cb4_89
RealGM
Posts: 27,650
And1: 517
Joined: Oct 02, 2004
       

 

Post#10 » by cb4_89 » Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:26 pm

34Celtic wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I think his dad and godfather were pretty good at one point, thats about all I can tell you though.


But is he good?

Return to Player Comparisons