BadHombre wrote:pepe1991 wrote:BadHombre wrote:
You’d hope that at 27 and 7 years into his professional career that Vucevic would be a better C than Bamba currently.
We had ‘prospects’ at nearly every position already after 7 seasons of lottery finishes, so whoever we picked was going to create some duplication unless we took a PG. Shai would have been great. But apart from him, the rest would have been battling with Gordon/Isaac/Fournier/Ross for minutes on the wing - and they’re all presently better than the rookies mentioned anyway.
No PG
No SF
SG 26 years old
Only PG worth drafting that was available was SGA. I’d have been happy with him but there would have been a meltdown if we took him over Bamba on draft night.
Gordon and Isaac both do a perfectly fine job playing SF in a 3&D capacity. What SF prospects would have been an improvement over them at our draft position? I think what you’re trying to say is that we don’t have an Allstar, playmaking SF.
Since when is 26 too old? You realise Vucevic is almost 2 years older than that, so if a 26 year old SG is a priority to upgrade then surely a near 28 year old C ranks just as highly? :shrug:
SGA and Sexton were both prospects that made sense and could have been traded back for. DSJr was also a pick that could have made sense the year prior. There was also a lot of time to acquire another point guard in the evaluation year other than DJ Augustine.
AG and Isaac
dont do particularly well covering the SF position. Neither are distributors and neither have a reliable outside-in game offensively. Isaac has covered the position the last few games and his offense looks pedestrian. They are both PF’s in all likelihood. Dynamic wing players are the most difficult position to acquire, but finding one that can provide good defense isn’t impossible to find.
There is no ceiling with Vuc or Evan. They are who they are at this point in their careers. Sure, they could be more effective with a better roster and coaching, but anyone on this roster can be moved.