2019 NBA Draft Prep

Spud2nique · Post #581 » by **Spud2nique** » Mon Jan 7, 2019 3:57 pm

Spud2nique wrote:
King Ken wrote:
Spud2nique wrote:King Ken I was trying to see what you wrote about Keldon Johnson about 5 pages ago. You didn’t even mention him and he’s in my top 3 wings for us.

Keldon can be our wing stopper and a Draymond type of personality on and off the court for Schlenk who drools dub blue n yellow.
I don't like him at all. I just mentioned it in the draft forum. I just see a struggling role player in the NBA when I project him

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Wow! This might be a debate for a minute as I think he’s somebody who has an NBA body and mentality to become a force. Something screams Westbrook lite. I’m not sure we got our enforcer in Omari last year, I think this is a guy Schlenk might take a look at for us. I like Culver for the system fit better but this guy is right there for me.

To me, while we have to acquire the best talent (BPA) we also have to start thinking about who we are as a team. What kind of a team do we want to be known as as far as style of play?

As of now we come out with a mold of the 2000 Suns, 80’s pistons and 2010’s warriors.

Do we see Trae more as Nash, Zeke Or Curry and which style best suits us, or is it a mix of the three.

In any event each of those teams had an enforcer.

Pistons (Laimbeer, Mahorn, Rodman)

Suns (Amare, Raja Bell, Kurt Thomas Alando Tucker)

Warriors (Draymond Green)

We have our playmakers in Trae and Huerter, we need a dash of tude, but that tude needs to be controlled and accompanied with talent.

Enter Keldon Johnson. A rough and tough kid who will give the wings around the league some issues as he seems to love getting after his man. Combine the defensive desire with his smooth offensive skills and it’s not a bad direction to go in my opinion.

Trae
Huerter
Keldon Johnson
Collins
?

Trae
Huerter
Keldon
Pf ?
Collins

King Ken · Post #582 » by **King Ken** » Mon Jan 7, 2019 3:58 pm

Spud2nique wrote:
Spud2nique wrote:
King Ken wrote:I don't like him at all. I just mentioned it in the draft forum. I just see a struggling role player in the NBA when I project him

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Wow! This might be a debate for a minute as I think he’s somebody who has an NBA body and mentality to become a force. Something screams Westbrook lite. I’m not sure we got our enforcer in Omari last year, I think this is a guy Schlenk might take a look at for us. I like Culver for the system fit better but this guy is right there for me.

To me, while we have to acquire the best talent (BPA) we also have to start thinking about who we are as a team. What kind of a team do we want to be known as as far as style of play?

As of now we come out with a mold of the 2000 Suns, 80’s pistons and 2010’s warriors.

I don't think I got an old mold in mind. I am just looking for guys who fit

Post #583 » by **Jamaaliver** » Mon Jan 7, 2019 4:03 pm

Spud2nique wrote:That’s why I wear a cape around all the time, I’m me.

Spud putting in work to stay svelte.

Spud2nique · Post #584 » by **Spud2nique** » Mon Jan 7, 2019 4:10 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:
Spud2nique wrote:That’s why I wear a cape around all the time, I’m me.

Spud putting in work to stay svelte.

no, I wish I ran like that. I usually stand with one foot forward arms crossed and finger at lips while pondering about something or judging others..and pointing with the other hand. Ala Frank Costanza’s lawyer.

Spud2nique · Post #585 » by **Spud2nique** » Mon Jan 7, 2019 4:17 pm

King Ken wrote:
Spud2nique wrote:
Spud2nique wrote:

Wow! This might be a debate for a minute as I think he’s somebody who has an NBA body and mentality to become a force. Something screams Westbrook lite. I’m not sure we got our enforcer in Omari last year, I think this is a guy Schlenk might take a look at for us. I like Culver for the system fit better but this guy is right there for me.

To me, while we have to acquire the best talent (BPA) we also have to start thinking about who we are as a team. What kind of a team do we want to be known as as far as style of play?

As of now we come out with a mold of the 2000 Suns, 80’s pistons and 2010’s warriors.

I don't think I got an old mold in mind. I am just looking for guys who fit

Oh but Ken we have to mold. If you aren’t molding now you better damn well have a molding plan in mind. Are we gonna be the run n gun suns with minimal defense or are we gonna invite intruders to State Farm and torture them Pistons style with the suffocating D and craft point play from our Zeke in Trae?

Always have a plan, then a backup, and a backup to that.

Post #586 » by **Jamaaliver** » Mon Jan 7, 2019 4:17 pm

Read on Twitter

Spud2nique · Post #587 » by **Spud2nique** » Mon Jan 7, 2019 4:19 pm

That’s the difference in the direction of a Keldon vs Culver vs Cam. Who are we going to be as a team? Again though if Cam is there I think it’s a must we take him. He’s too freakin smooth to pass up. I do question his mental makeup though, is he wired and awake for 82 plus playoffs?

Spud2nique · Post #588 » by **Spud2nique** » Mon Jan 7, 2019 4:21 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:

Read on Twitter

Nas going 3rd overall ahead of Cam? Ummm, that would be a tough sell.

King Ken · Post #589 » by **King Ken** » Mon Jan 7, 2019 4:52 pm

Spud2nique wrote:
King Ken wrote:
Spud2nique wrote:

To me, while we have to acquire the best talent (BPA) we also have to start thinking about who we are as a team. What kind of a team do we want to be known as as far as style of play?

As of now we come out with a mold of the 2000 Suns, 80’s pistons and 2010’s warriors.

I don't think I got an old mold in mind. I am just looking for guys who fit

Oh but Ken we have to mold. If you aren’t molding now you better damn well have a molding plan in mind. Are we gonna be the run n gun suns with minimal defense or are we gonna invite intruders to State Farm and torture them Pistons style with the suffocating D and craft point play from our Zeke in Trae?

Always have a plan, then a backup, and a backup to that.

I am looking for wings right now. Two way players with length who can shoot 3s and play on and off the ball and do the little things but can score as well. Just versatile players. You can never have enough of those.

Spud2nique · Post #590 » by **Spud2nique** » Mon Jan 7, 2019 5:41 pm

King Ken wrote:
Spud2nique wrote:
King Ken wrote:I don't think I got an old mold in mind. I am just looking for guys who fit

Oh but Ken we have to mold. If you aren’t molding now you better damn well have a molding plan in mind. Are we gonna be the run n gun suns with minimal defense or are we gonna invite intruders to State Farm and torture them Pistons style with the suffocating D and craft point play from our Zeke in Trae?

Always have a plan, then a backup, and a backup to that.

I am looking for wings right now. Two way players with length who can shoot 3s and play on and off the ball and do the little things but can score as well. Just versatile players. You can never have enough of those.

Yes. Just overall pic thing. But yes.

Post #591 » by **Jamaaliver** » Tue Jan 8, 2019 1:57 pm

Read on Twitter

Sent from my RC555L using RealGM mobile app

Post #592 » by **Jamaaliver** » Tue Jan 8, 2019 3:06 pm

Most Glaring Weaknesses for Every Top NBA Draft Prospect

Zion Williamson (Duke, PF/C, Freshman)

Glaring weakness: Shooting

If there is an NBA team that doesn't have Zion Williamson at No. 1, his shooting is likely the reason.

Can he become a franchise star without a jump shot? Williamson is 4-of-21 from three and only converting 70.4 percent of his free throws.

Spotting up off the ball, he ranks in the 24th percentile in points per possession, and he's made just one pull-up all season.

Through 13 games, 75.2 percent of his offense has come at the rim. Can Williamson, at 6'7", continue to rely on getting to the basket and finishing inside for volume scoring against NBA front lines?

He could be that outlier, given his seemingly unmatched mix of power and explosiveness. But the eventual lottery winner will be expecting its selection to become a routine, 20-plus-point weapon. Its general manager must assess Williamson's chances of improving as a shooter, plus how it will affect his game if he struggles to develop a jump shot.

Bleacher Report

Spoiler:

Post #593 » by **Jamaaliver** » Tue Jan 8, 2019 3:06 pm

^cont.

Jarrett Culver (Texas Tech, SG, Sophomore)

Glaring weakness No. 1: Explosion/upside

You wouldn't know it from Jarrett Culver's 67.1 percent finishing rate at the rim, but athleticism isn't one of his strengths.

He happens to be crafty with his footwork and change of speed, and he does an effective job of using his length and body control to separate and convert. But without explosive burst, Culver won't have margin for error against NBA defenders, and teams must determine how much his lack of speed and bounce will hold him back as a scorer and playmaker.

Glaring weakness No. 2: Pull-up shooting

Though Culver has already shown improvement as a pull-up shooter (19-of-46), the eye-test results still aren't convincing. The ball takes some time before it leaves his hands, and it can appear that Culver is aiming his shot once he's airborne.

Nassir Little (North Carolina, SF/PF, Freshman)

Glaring weakness: Shot creation

Nassir Little has as many field goals off putbacks as he does out of spot-ups, post-ups and isolation combined.

Except for when he can tap into his strong physical tools and athleticism to score, Little has struggled to generate his own offense in the half court. His lowlights consist of times when he drove straight into a wall without a plan. And though his minutes have been limited, Little often goes long stretches without getting himself involved.

He's still been efficient inside the arc, where he's making 60.0 percent of his shots. But at this stage, scouts will have a tough time identifying any bankable skills in Little's bag.

Glaring weakness No. 2: Shooting range

He hasn't looked comfortable as a spot-up shooter, missing 20 of his first 26 three-point attempts. He's hit six triples through 14 games. It wouldn't be so worrisome if he was sharper on the ball in terms of creating.

Little has hit some encouraging dribble jumpers in the mid-range, but as a projected off-ball scorer over the next few years in the NBA, he'll need to become a bigger catch-and-shoot threat from three.

Glaring weakness No 3: Defense

Little's impressive defensive tools haven't translated to effective defense. He has been easier to beat off the bounce than expected. And he hasn't provided much playmaking, with only nine steals and eight blocks all season.

The early results suggest he's better suited to guard bigger forwards, but at 6'6", he'll have a height disadvantage against most NBA 4s.

Spud2nique · Post #594 » by **Spud2nique** » Tue Jan 8, 2019 3:32 pm

I’m confused about Nas Little’s defense. So he has the tools to D up but doesn’t? Initially I liked him, then I hated him. I can’t get a read yet.

Post #595 » by **HMFFL** » Wed Jan 9, 2019 12:27 pm

Nothing that we didn't already know.

Vince Carter on Zion Williamson: 'He'll Be Ready' for the NBA

Atlanta Hawks wing Vince Carter told Myron Medcalf of ESPN.com that Duke forward Zion Williamson, who is the top candidate to be the No. 1 pick in the 2019 NBA draft, will "be ready [for the NBA]."

Carter, who has played in the NBA since he was drafted fifth overall by the Toronto Raptors in 1998, offered further comments: "He's super, super athletic," the 21-year veteran said. "He has an NBA body already. I think, more than anything, with all his ability, I just say take his time, develop his game, because when you get here, it's a different beast as far as expectations. A lot of guys try to get here and just develop while they get here.". https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2814741-vince-carter-on-zion-williamson-hell-be-ready-for-the-nba

Sent from my SM-N920P using RealGM mobile app

Post #596 » by **Jamaaliver** » Wed Jan 9, 2019 12:34 pm

Read on Twitter

Post #597 » by **Jamaaliver** » Wed Jan 9, 2019 4:42 pm

^When it comes to on court fit and locker room fit, I truly believe J Culver is the absolute best option for our team.

He isn't the best talent, but seems the clear best fit for what we're building. And he appears to have the size to play the SF position for us, which will be a priority moving forward.

Post #598 » by **Jamaaliver** » Wed Jan 9, 2019 5:04 pm

Brandon Clarke’s NBA potential

Will it just be one year for the redshirt junior?

Brandon Clarke has forced his way up multiple NBA Draft big boards by the virtue of his highlight style of play, blocking shots and dunking on fools as if it is going out of style.

All of this success might make Clarke the next Gonzaga big man to depart for the NBA early.

Clarke transferred to Gonzaga from San Jose State as someone who seemed to be a lunch pail sort of guy. He cleaned up on the glass and he got his points.

Clarke is averaging pretty much career highs in every statistical category available. Most importantly, he is third in the country in player efficiency rating (PER), and second in the country in overall box plus/minus. The one player above him in both categories? Zion Williamson.

When you look at Clarke’s overall package, it is pretty clear that he has the natural ability and talent to play at the higher level. [He's] averaging 3.3 blocks per game, and he is on pace to shatter Gonzaga’s single season record for blocks. He is second in the country in that category.

His agility, lateral quickness, and lightning-quick reaction times allow him to be a versatile defender. Opposing players cannot isolate Clarke out on the wing and expect to beat him to the rim. This combination of size and elite-level athleticism has turned Clarke into one of the most fearsome rim protectors in college basketball. NBA scouts have started to take notice.

On offense, the amount of work the coaching staff put into his shot has paid off. Clarke is shooting a staggering 68.9 percent from the floor, the third-best mark in the nation. His speed and athleticism mean he can cut, drive, pick, roll, do pretty much everything he needs to, to get to the hoop. In fact, that is where he generally ends up.

Spoiler:

That isn’t to say Clarke’s offensive profile is a fit for the NBA straight away. If Clarke gets drafted, it is based on the strength of his defensive prowess and his offensive awareness. Offensively, he isn’t as versatile as required to earn consistent time in the NBA quite yet.

Gonzaga SB Nation

Spud2nique · Post #599 » by **Spud2nique** » Wed Jan 9, 2019 5:21 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:^When it comes to on court fit and locker room fit, I truly believe J Culver is the absolute best option for our team.

He isn't the best talent, but seems the clear best fit for what we're building. And he appears to have the size to play the SF position for us, which will be a priority moving forward.

So last year I had Luka, you had Wendell and kg had sexy Sexton. This year we all on Culver! Wow! Good. Less back n forth lol.

jayu70 · Post #600 » by **jayu70** » Wed Jan 9, 2019 7:28 pm

Spud2nique wrote:
Jamaaliver wrote:^When it comes to on court fit and locker room fit, I truly believe J Culver is the absolute best option for our team.

He isn't the best talent, but seems the clear best fit for what we're building. And he appears to have the size to play the SF position for us, which will be a priority moving forward.

So last year I had Luka, you had Wendell and kg had sexy Sexton. This year we all on Culver! Wow! Good. Less back n forth lol.

Should we be drafting for 'fit/need' or 'Best Player'
Except Zion, are all these wings comparable?

What direction should Hawks go with their lottery picks?