Anthony Davis requests trade, part 3

LuckyLeprechaun · Post #581 » by **LuckyLeprechaun** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 10:53 pm

thelarrybirdx wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Who els are we supposed to play? Nice wins vs TO, a healthy Indy, and a good game vs the Dubs too. Playing well in this one, too.

Also hold a win against this OKC team and Milwaukee too

Hence the 90%

If the "good" teams are everyone over .600, meaning Mil, Tor, Phi, Ind, GS, OKC, Den and Por, we are 8-6 vs those teams. Those teams records vs the "good" teams are all fairly similar but regardless 8 wins out of 34 is a lot better than 10%.

2 losses vs orl, 1 vs nyk, 1 vs phx, 1 vs dal, 1 vs cha is the real blemish on us. We would be in 1st place in the nba if we won all those against bad teams.

SLCceltic · Post #582 » by **SLCceltic** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:10 pm

Edug27 wrote:Guys.. Trading IT gave us a bad look and y’all want to turn around and trade Hayward? I highly doubt Hayward is going anywhere. Waste of time discussing him.

THIS THIS THIS !!
Hayward is not going to be traded !!!!.
That would be the WORST look ever and we're SO much better than that!

For those of you so down on Hayward take a good look at what PG13 is doing these days

CeltsfanSinceBirth · Post #583 » by **CeltsfanSinceBirth** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:14 pm

If it was such an evil move, then why the hell did IT call Ainge up and beg him to take him back this past summer? Lol

thelarrybirdx · Post #584 » by **thelarrybirdx** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:17 pm

Edug27 wrote:Guys.. Trading IT gave us a bad look and y’all want to turn around and trade Hayward? I highly doubt Hayward is going anywhere. Waste of time discussing him.

You think Ainge cares?

SLCceltic · Post #585 » by **SLCceltic** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:18 pm

IT and Hayward apples and oranges
Hayward left the team that drafted him, loved him to come to Boston and play with Brad .. he has a gruesome injury and we ship him out !?? Worst look ever IMO

SLCceltic · Post #586 » by **SLCceltic** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:20 pm

thelarrybirdx wrote:
Edug27 wrote:Guys.. Trading IT gave us a bad look and y’all want to turn around and trade Hayward? I highly doubt Hayward is going anywhere. Waste of time discussing him.

You think Ainge cares?

Absolutely YES he cares .. tot diff from IT

Edug27 · Post #587 » by **Edug27** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:21 pm

thelarrybirdx wrote:
Edug27 wrote:Guys.. Trading IT gave us a bad look and y’all want to turn around and trade Hayward? I highly doubt Hayward is going anywhere. Waste of time discussing him.

You think Ainge cares?

About Hayward? Brad does. Big time.

Edug27 · Post #588 » by **Edug27** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:21 pm

SLCceltic wrote:IT and Hayward apples and oranges
Hayward left the team that drafted him, loved him to come to Boston and play with Brad .. he has a gruesome injury and we ship him out !?? Worst look ever IMO

Hayward is a Brad guy.. so yea.. bigggg difference

Post #589 » by **K For Three** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:21 pm

ViperGTS wrote:
Kyrie For Three wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Not sure I could envision the Warriors doing a S&T with us for Durant making their top competition even stronger.

Same. I am more then happy though to land Anthony Davis.

Ya. A dude who at least has shown pretty decent interest in the Cs (Durant) versus a dude who’s every signal from actions to words hasn’t shown any inclination to want to play in Boston. KD all day and it doesn’t blow your team up. You should want AD to go to LA. Keeps him out of the East, and Bron is getting older and soon AD will be in LA basically Pelicans version 2.0.

I would have zero problems getting KD if it came down to it. :nod:

I consider him the best player in the league ATM anyway with Lebron slowing down.

edit: AD or KD (either one) would be the best in the league on the C's next year IMO though.

Post #590 » by **K For Three** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:23 pm

Edug27 wrote:
thelarrybirdx wrote:
Edug27 wrote:Guys.. Trading IT gave us a bad look and y’all want to turn around and trade Hayward? I highly doubt Hayward is going anywhere. Waste of time discussing him.

You think Ainge cares?

About Hayward? Brad does. Big time.

He'd get over ruled by our FO.

thelarrybirdx · Post #591 » by **thelarrybirdx** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:25 pm

Edug27 wrote:
thelarrybirdx wrote:
Edug27 wrote:Guys.. Trading IT gave us a bad look and y’all want to turn around and trade Hayward? I highly doubt Hayward is going anywhere. Waste of time discussing him.

You think Ainge cares?

About Hayward? Brad does. Big time.

Brad doesn't dictate roster moves.

Valid · Post #592 » by **Valid** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:25 pm

thelarrybirdx wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote:
Sure, against the dregs of the league for the most part. But yes, Hayward looks a little better.

Let's see what happens today against a WC team with a comparable record-- and it's own little win streak (7 in a row). They'll miss Baynes against Adams.

Doesn't sound like you are rooting for them lol.

He's not wrong, like 90% of our wins have come against the worst teams in the league

Why are you such a terrible poster and when are you going to come out and admit that you aren't a Celtics fan?

Valid · Post #593 » by **Valid** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:26 pm

thelarrybirdx wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
thelarrybirdx wrote:
You think Ainge cares?

About Hayward? Brad does. Big time.

Brad doesn't dictate roster moves.

Lmao. Uh, yeah. He does. Before Cousins was traded to NOLA, Ainge literally asked Stevens if he wanted to coach Cousins and Stevens said no.

thelarrybirdx · Post #594 » by **thelarrybirdx** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:26 pm

Valid wrote:
thelarrybirdx wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Doesn't sound like you are rooting for them lol.

He's not wrong, like 90% of our wins have come against the worst teams in the league

Why are you such a terrible poster and when are you going to come out and admit that you aren't a Celtics fan?

Are you alright? This post wasn't really supposed to trigger anyone

DK-All Day · Post #595 » by **DK-All Day** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:27 pm

I wouldn’t trade Hayward yet. Give him until the start of the playoffs to get his **** together. Otherwise, park his ass on the end of the bench. Come playoff time, the best players play, period. This team has been patient with him all season, but it’s go time starting in mid April.

Post #596 » by **K For Three** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:32 pm

Valid wrote:
thelarrybirdx wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
About Hayward? Brad does. Big time.

Brad doesn't dictate roster moves.

Lmao. Uh, yeah. He does. Before Cousins was traded to NOLA, Ainge literally asked Stevens if he wanted to coach Cousins and Stevens said no.

He does and I am not saying Gordon will be moved or anything, clearly they want to give him time.

HOWEVER, nobody would pass up Durant or Davis IMO on the Celtics. Nobody. It's an absolute no brainer to me if you can make one happen.

I fear more though Al would be the one GS would want for a KD swap since Kerr adores him.

Curmudgeon · Post #597 » by **Curmudgeon** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:34 pm

Well, good old "two point Gordy" actually had three points today, on 1-6 shooting, along with two turnovers. Every other Celtic was in double figures.

Captain_Caveman · Post #598 » by **Captain_Caveman** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:41 pm

Curmudgeon wrote:Well, good old "two point Gordy" actually had three points today, on 1-6 shooting, along with two turnovers. Every other Celtic was in double figures.

Great job finding a way to still complain today, lol.

Curmudgeon · Post #599 » by **Curmudgeon** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:54 pm

Captain_Caveman wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote:Well, good old "two point Gordy" actually had three points today, on 1-6 shooting, along with two turnovers. Every other Celtic was in double figures.

Great job finding a way to still complain today, lol.

Hayward made it easy for me.

Roddy · Post #600 » by **Roddy** » Sun Feb 3, 2019 11:57 pm

Curmudgeon wrote:Well, good old "two point Gordy" actually had three points today, on 1-6 shooting, along with two turnovers. Every other Celtic was in double figures.

Where were you Friday, when he had 14pts, 3rbs, 2asts, 2 blks on 5/8 FG (2/3 from 3) ???