EazyRoc wrote:kg01 wrote:EazyRoc wrote:RJ Barrett is someone I’m starting to see as a high potential pro player. He’s still got big strides to make with his ball handling and become more reliable as a set shooter, but I think he can play really well here and could see an All NBA team in his career. He’s going to take a season or two in the pros like PG. He has legit two way potential though, plays with heart, has an elite first step, is already a good pull up jump shooter, and has that dog in him. He’s got to improve his handles and consistency with his jumper, but the foundation to be an elite NBA wing is clearly there.
I also think we need a combo forward too. I think TP doesn’t exactly fit that bill and prefers being perimeter oriented. Sekou Doumbouya, DeAndre Hunter, and Kezie Okpala could all be options with our second (hopeful) lottery pick.
I'm not sure Barrett is a fit with us more than Huerter is. He's not a defender, at all, so I'm not sure there is 2-way potential there (low athleticism). JMHO so I hope it's clear that I'm not knocking yours.
He potentially has the makings of an ability to get a shot when you need it. That's the only draw he has for me. The problem is I foresee a lotta poor 1-on-1 offense from him amidst all that. He seems like a poor-shooting Devin Booker which turns my stomach (I can't stand Booker - he's a winning-stat/losing-game player to me).
I agree with the second part about the need for a combo-forward type. I'm sour on Hunter though. I'm low on UVA players overall. They have a 'type'. Super solid, heady. Better served as low 1sts/2nd rounders, not lotto guys.
I see him as a compliment to Huerter not someone taking his spot. I look at RJ as a SF in the league and he isn’t someone I consider to be a low-athleticism player like Trae and Luka looked. He’s a solid NBA athlete in my eyes.
You need guys who can get a shot reliably when you need them. In our system where guys catch, attack, and kick I think Barrett would be a Star. The system is built for a guy like that. I don’t think what we are seeing at Duke is the best projection on the type of player he’ll be in the NBA.
But I can see where you’re coming from based on how he’s playing at Duke. I felt the exact same way earlier in the season. But then I thought about the kind of player he would be if he improved his ball handling and extended his range. The Demar Derozan comparisons aren’t the best IMO. He’s better than Derozan at the same point and has intangibles that Derozan doesn’t.
Hmm, that
is interesting.
Not sure why I neglected to acknowledge that he'll clearly be a different player in the NBA than he is at Duke. That's
always the case with their players.
I do think he'd be fine athletically at the NBA level. I just don't think he'll out-athlete guys. He'll just be 'ok' which, to me, could be an issue considering his "elite" skill would be that ability to get a bucket. He kinda reminds me of Sexton a bit too in that regard.
Agree he's better than Derozan at this stage but I do think that could be a good comp for what type of player he'd be. And that's not necessarily a knock. Derozan is a guy who carved out a good niche despite lacking high-end athleticism/speed.
I'm gonna keep watching him though. See how he does in tourney play.
Honestly though, it might be all for nothing. Not sure we'll end up in position to get him anyway. That's why I've focused on that next tier for our pick. Culver and guys at that tier.