ImageImageImage

WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker

Moderators: Snakebites, dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip

vic
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 1,101
Joined: Dec 27, 2012

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#41 » by vic » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:14 pm

I guess we don't need 3 OR D.

Either Kennards a future AllStar or we are about to see some major tanking going on.

Who wins a championship first?

Tobias with Philly?
Bullock with Lakers?
Stanley with Milwaukee?
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 49,190
And1: 12,561
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#42 » by BadMofoPimp » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:14 pm

MotownMadness wrote:Yeah Thon sucks and that’s fine cause I think we just prefer to go into next season with the whole roster on expirings so they can try too add someone to Blake through trade without paying to dump bad contracts doing it


Doesn't Thon have a longer contract than Stanley?
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,280
And1: 5,258
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#43 » by Kilo » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:14 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:Pistons get rid of two wings. There must be something else going on as we are getting thin at the SF/SG position.


Svi is a 2/3, we'll probably use him as a SF. Stanley was playing fair amount of four at one point as well.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,793
And1: 22,842
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#44 » by MotownMadness » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:15 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:Yeah Thon sucks and that’s fine cause I think we just prefer to go into next season with the whole roster on expirings so they can try too add someone to Blake through trade without paying to dump bad contracts doing it


Doesn't Thon have a longer contract than Stanley?

One more year which would put him in line with everyone else
Billl
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,340
And1: 3,455
Joined: Sep 06, 2013

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#45 » by Billl » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:17 pm

Spider156 wrote:He's 7'1", how much athleticism does he need? Can he run? Is he quick? He can shoot, that tells me he's better than Leuer lol


He can't run. He looks like he should be able to run, but he's pretty slow.
He isn't quick. Again, he's skinny, so it looks like he's going to be quick, but he isn't.

He can kinda shoot. 33% from 3 this year and lifetime. Not bad for a 7 footer, but nothing to get excited about
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 49,190
And1: 12,561
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#46 » by BadMofoPimp » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:17 pm

Kilo wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:Pistons get rid of two wings. There must be something else going on as we are getting thin at the SF/SG position.


Svi is a 2/3, we'll probably use him as a SF. Stanley was playing fair amount of four at one point as well.


Svi has barely cracked NBA playing time. I doubt he will be used much if at all.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,479
And1: 18,327
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#47 » by Snakebites » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:26 pm

MotownMadness wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:Yeah Thon sucks and that’s fine cause I think we just prefer to go into next season with the whole roster on expirings so they can try too add someone to Blake through trade without paying to dump bad contracts doing it


Doesn't Thon have a longer contract than Stanley?

One more year which would put him in line with everyone else

Yes but it reduces our wiggle room under the luxury tax for next year, though it does increase that wiggle room a little bit this year.

I don't understand.
ChuckVanBrown
Senior
Posts: 656
And1: 352
Joined: Feb 24, 2016
     

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#48 » by ChuckVanBrown » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:29 pm

I like the trade. I wasn’t interested in keeping SJ next season anyway, and we trade him for a cheap backup C that could have marginal upside.

Also like the Bullock trade. Again, he likely would have left in the offseason, and got a cheap young player in return and a future 2nd. Above all else, these moves make us worse this season, potentially landing us a good lottery pick. Would have been nice to possibly get more for these guys, but I’m not that bothered by the return.
JNewton
Analyst
Posts: 3,041
And1: 240
Joined: Aug 20, 2002

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#49 » by JNewton » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:30 pm

Snakebites wrote:I don't understand.


If there is a motto for the last ten years of Pistons basketball, this is it.
DocRI
Starter
Posts: 2,126
And1: 764
Joined: Jun 17, 2010

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#50 » by DocRI » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:30 pm

Laimbeer wrote:
DocRI wrote:1) Just like the Reggie / Svi trade, we got something for an expiring contract rather than nothing. Just like when the Lions traded Golden Tate, this means Stefanski didn’t plan and / or knew he didn’t have the money to resign these guys.

2) We are stockpiling contracts that expire next offseason (Svi has a team option).

3) Not paying Bullock and Stanley says to me that Stefanski is wisely changing the way this franchise manages its cap sheet — much like Boston, it’s gonna be high paid stars (Blake, Dre, fill in the blank star acquired in the next year with all that expiring money) surrounded by cheap talent. No more $7M - $10M bench and role players, which is what it would’ve cost to re-up Bullock or Johnson; you get that production from guys on cheap rookie deals and spend your money on stars.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums


I like the thinking, but it's a thin crop - Draymond, Lowry, player options for Derozan and Porter. I think that's about it.


Cap space / expiring deals can equal trade opportunities; just look at the KP deal for a very recent example. I think that’s the route Stefanski takes.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM mobile app
flow
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,718
And1: 2,882
Joined: Feb 18, 2016

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#51 » by flow » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:30 pm

How much longer do I have to wait for RJ to be dumped? I've been waiting since the day he signed.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,793
And1: 22,842
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#52 » by MotownMadness » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:30 pm

Snakebites wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:
Doesn't Thon have a longer contract than Stanley?

One more year which would put him in line with everyone else

Yes but it reduces our wiggle room under the luxury tax for next year, though it does increase that wiggle room a little bit this year.

I don't understand.

Not sure, I could see the value of our expirings next year as to where this year it would almost be hard to replace with our cap being through the rough
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,479
And1: 18,327
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#53 » by Snakebites » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:34 pm

Honestly the thing I'm most depressed about is how much Langston Galloway we're likely to see following these trades.

I favored dealing Johnson when I thought we'd at least get a pick or something for him. With this move I feel like I'd rather we just ride out the year and let SJ expire. It's just not a good move.
User avatar
bballnmike
Veteran
Posts: 2,671
And1: 1,531
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
Location: Brooklyn, NY
     

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#54 » by bballnmike » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:49 pm

Kilo wrote:
bballnmike wrote:
Read on Twitter

This doesn't make sense given Stanley makes more than Maker so we net gained more space with the Bucks swap and it had nothing to do with space opened up with Bullock trade.

And if he's talking about next year we're still $15M under the tax now and Bullock would have made more on the open market as a UFA.

Good point, I just asked him to clarify that. We'll see if he responds..
Image
User avatar
JustinCredible
Head Coach
Posts: 6,254
And1: 2,965
Joined: Nov 08, 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:
       

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#55 » by JustinCredible » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:49 pm

Thon is unquestionably 4 years older than his listed age. He completed 4 years of high school in Perth Australia, and then repeated 4 years of high school in Canada.

There is a thread on the Bucks board that has visual evidence of the Australia yearbooks. I'm sure it can also be found on reddit.
All posts are my own opinion.
Twitter: @itsjwills
440BB
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,506
And1: 839
Joined: Jul 13, 2017
     

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#56 » by 440BB » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:52 pm

I won't miss Stanley bricking a three.
Or a layup.
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#57 » by Spider156 » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:54 pm

Snakebites wrote:Honestly the thing I'm most depressed about is how much Langston Galloway we're likely to see following these trades.

I favored dealing Johnson when I thought we'd at least get a pick or something for him. With this move I feel like I'd rather we just ride out the year and let SJ expire. It's just not a good move.

How can it be a bad move? If there's any chance Maker is a role player we win in this scenario. Stanley was probably not going to be offered the QO. He was walking out for nothing which is what you said you want. I don't agree. I think Stefanski is doing what he can to keep assets. I'll take it.
Defense wins championships
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#58 » by Spider156 » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:54 pm

JustinCredible wrote:Thon is unquestionably 4 years older than his listed age. He completed 4 years of high school in Perth Australia, and then repeated 4 years of high school in Canada.

There is a thread on the Bucks board that has visual evidence of the Australia yearbooks. I'm sure it can also be found on reddit.

So he's 25? Means he's just entering his prime. That's bad haha. I hope he can stay on the court. He'll get plenty of time on our team.
Defense wins championships
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#59 » by The Penguin » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:54 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:Pistons get rid of two wings. There must be something else going on as we are getting thin at the SF/SG position.


It's called save money and half-*** tank.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 51,479
And1: 18,327
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: WOJBomb - Stanley Johnson for Thon Maker 

Post#60 » by Snakebites » Wed Feb 6, 2019 5:58 pm

Spider156 wrote:
Snakebites wrote:Honestly the thing I'm most depressed about is how much Langston Galloway we're likely to see following these trades.

I favored dealing Johnson when I thought we'd at least get a pick or something for him. With this move I feel like I'd rather we just ride out the year and let SJ expire. It's just not a good move.

How can it be a bad move? If there's any chance Maker is a role player we win in this scenario. Stanley was probably not going to be offered the QO. He was walking out for nothing which is what you said you want. I don't agree. I think Stefanski is doing what he can to keep assets. I'll take it.

I don’t think Maker has that shot. All were really looking at is being on the hook financially for another year. Maker may not even get playing time over Zaza. Ask Bucks fans how they feel about being rid of him.

Return to Detroit Pistons