Duke4life831 wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:Watching Duke St. Johns.
Williamson is a 285 lb Jaylen Brown. Exciting player. His stroke from the free throw line is bad, though, and his release on the jumper is too low. Those will be issues when he hits the NBA. He's a legit No. 1 but he's no LeBron.
RJ Barrett is too much like Wiggins, and not just because they're both Canadian. He looks better than he is.
After Williamson, the guy on that Duke team I'm liking best is Reddish. Very nice player at both ends.
The gap between Zion and Brown is gigantic. If they were close, we would've seen Brown come somewhat close to making the impact that Zion is currently making. Jaylen's TS% was 52%, Zion's is 71% and climbing while also scoring 8 more points per game. Brown averaged 1.4 steals and blocks combined. Zion averages 4 steals and blocks combined. Brown had horrible touch around the rim, Zion has elite of the elite touch around the rim. Brown lacked natural feel and I, Zion is elite on both areas.
Wiggins and RJ are also very different. Wiggins biggest negative was his lack of fire and intensity. RJ's biggest strength is his fire and aggressiveness.
For sure I do rate Zion higher than Brown since you can't ignore his stats/athleticism/strength/skill level but I do think 3 point shooting/shooting is a great leveler than no one should ignore for most players that are not Shaq clones.
So my concern with Zion living up to the growing expectations in the long run is just eras from what I have seen. I do think he should be an all-star. But does he have enough to dominate as a legit NBA superstar/top 10 player without a 3 point?
NBAdraft.net compares him to Charles Barkley which isn't a bad comparison if one remembers the young Philly version of Barkley instead of the older Phoenix version. (Barkley faced much better competition in college than Williamson since future NBA/international players where mostly staying until after their jr/senior years so ignore his college stats and Barkley wasn't in the best shape in college) IMHO, get rid of 3 point shot in the NBA right now and Charles Barkley at his best is probably a top 3ish player in the NBA.
But the 3 point shot since Barkley couldn't hit them at a good rate just really hurts a lot of his value on offense. Still an all-star IMHO but not a superstar given the rest of his abilities.
I think Zion is a prime example of why the NBA has to make major moves to cut the amount of 3 point shooting in half since he is obviously a damn exciting player to watch. Fpr him to possibly be considered a "mild disappointment" for his NBA career if he doesn't get the 3 but a superstar if he played in let's say 1988 I think is awful for the NBA.
As a fan do I want to pay to watch Zion being Zion or Zion to just try to turn himself into a player that shoots 6-7 3's?
IMHO the answer isn't getting someone with Zion's skillset to be shooting 3's but I think NBA really needs to reevaluate things. I made a thread about this on GB a few weeks ago saying just count 3's as 2.5's. I know ridiculous but not as nuts as Rockets tossing up 75 3's in a game.