:)cwb3 wrote:I can't decide in which direction I want to overreact today!
Wizards fans dilemma.
Sent from my SM-J337T using RealGM mobile app
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
:)cwb3 wrote:I can't decide in which direction I want to overreact today!
stilldropin20 wrote:Portis is more than capable of putting up 18 and 8 with with a 57%TS in a winning effort.
jabari parker is straight up crap. at least he came to chicago with the worst attitude ive ever seen in an NBA player...The bulls only signed him to help sell tickets. chicago stans are biggest suckers on the planet for iso ball local products. and i have no idea why. Most dont even live in chicago. They're like farm boys from iowa and cleveland that dont get off the couch so watching players that jump high or perform iso ball crossovers is cool or something...but they just dont get the nuance of understanding the complete game of basketball. You guys joke about banning me from the bulls board but that literally banned from not backing down from saying jimmy butler is "no that guy" to build to around because i knew 3 years ago Jimmy butler didn't have the temperament to lead young players not mesh will with vets.
Now Jimmy Butler might now...3 years later...and 3 months from being a UFA...finally see the writing on the wall that its time to get along and go along and not play so selfishly after he wore out is welcome in 3 spots.
But back to jabari...he flat out sucks. he has no interest at all in playing WITH the other 4 guys on the court. Like jimmy butler, they exist to pass him the ball, get out of the way, and be ready to shoot when he finally decides to give up the rock. there is no nuance there about using the entire team to set up the entire team...its just taking turns playing one on one basketball. It's Thibsball: find yourself dumb enough basketball player with a fragile enough super ego to think he "can" and "should" do it all by himself. build them up by surrounding them up lessor role players that stick to mopping floor while that player does all the glory work, and hope that player doesn't lose his ballz before the end of the 2nd round of the playoff where most pretenders do...even prime iverson. tmac. carter lost their ballz early in the playoffs. certainly Rose and Jimmy butler did too. jabari parker aint even gonna get you IN THE PLAYOFFS.
Now portis as i said on the day of the trade is different. there is hope there that he can be a garnett type player on offense...perhaps even better than garnett of offense. he will move the ball. set good picks. rebound. take open shots and from the 3 and make them at a decent clip. solid post game. He might even put it all together and be a really good offensive contributor. On defense...he still doesn't fully understand what the opponent is doing yet so he anticipates poorly. <--which is 95% of defense (reading the offense). But he does have the size and athleticism to at least be a decent, or a net "neutral" defender.
doclinkin wrote:payitforward wrote:Ruzious wrote:I don't think he'll ever get defense - after watching him in Milwaukee. His defensive reactions are bewilderingly slow. It's like his brain shuts off when he's on defense.
Well there's no question about it! Watch him throughout his career. A guy doesn't go from being picked #2 in the draft to teetering on the edge of never putting on an NBA uniform again in only 4 years unless he really works at it.
.
2 ACL tears make a difference there. Plus mindset attitude and immaturity. But. Modern medicine works miracles? Being on your last chance may wake you up? People mature?
We need a coach with defensive bonafides and fundamentals and a good scheme though otherwise there's no chance to develop good habits even if a player wanted to make a change.
payitforward wrote:doclinkin wrote:payitforward wrote:Well there's no question about it! Watch him throughout his career. A guy doesn't go from being picked #2 in the draft to teetering on the edge of never putting on an NBA uniform again in only 4 years unless he really works at it.
.
2 ACL tears make a difference there. Plus mindset attitude and immaturity. But. Modern medicine works miracles? Being on your last chance may wake you up? People mature?
We need a coach with defensive bonafides and fundamentals and a good scheme though otherwise there's no chance to develop good habits even if a player wanted to make a change.
Absolutely. I'm pulling for him.
OTOH, what have "mindset attitude and maturity" done for me, I ask you? Have I matured? No way. Modern medicine has been helpful, though, I can't argue with that. Along with easy access to mind-altering drugs.
Ruzious wrote:stilldropin20 wrote:Portis... On defense...he still doesn't fully understand what the opponent is doing yet so he anticipates poorly. <--which is 95% of defense (reading the offense). But he does have the size and athleticism to at least be a decent, or a net "neutral" defender.
And with Parker, it's so weird that he came to Chicago with a bad attitude - since he signe a 1 year contract - presumably a make good contract so that he could impress people enough to earn a big long-term contract. Even if he does well these last 30 or so games, I wouldn't trust that he'll keep it up in the future. Again, I hope I'm wrong.
Ruzious wrote:stilldropin20 wrote:Portis is more than capable of putting up 18 and 8 with with a 57%TS in a winning effort.
jabari parker is straight up crap. at least he came to chicago with the worst attitude ive ever seen in an NBA player...The bulls only signed him to help sell tickets. chicago stans are biggest suckers on the planet for iso ball local products. and i have no idea why. Most dont even live in chicago. They're like farm boys from iowa and cleveland that dont get off the couch so watching players that jump high or perform iso ball crossovers is cool or something...but they just dont get the nuance of understanding the complete game of basketball. You guys joke about banning me from the bulls board but that literally banned from not backing down from saying jimmy butler is "no that guy" to build to around because i knew 3 years ago Jimmy butler didn't have the temperament to lead young players not mesh will with vets.
Now Jimmy Butler might now...3 years later...and 3 months from being a UFA...finally see the writing on the wall that its time to get along and go along and not play so selfishly after he wore out is welcome in 3 spots.
But back to jabari...he flat out sucks. he has no interest at all in playing WITH the other 4 guys on the court. Like jimmy butler, they exist to pass him the ball, get out of the way, and be ready to shoot when he finally decides to give up the rock. there is no nuance there about using the entire team to set up the entire team...its just taking turns playing one on one basketball. It's Thibsball: find yourself dumb enough basketball player with a fragile enough super ego to think he "can" and "should" do it all by himself. build them up by surrounding them up lessor role players that stick to mopping floor while that player does all the glory work, and hope that player doesn't lose his ballz before the end of the 2nd round of the playoff where most pretenders do...even prime iverson. tmac. carter lost their ballz early in the playoffs. certainly Rose and Jimmy butler did too. jabari parker aint even gonna get you IN THE PLAYOFFS.
Now portis as i said on the day of the trade is different. there is hope there that he can be a garnett type player on offense...perhaps even better than garnett of offense. he will move the ball. set good picks. rebound. take open shots and from the 3 and make them at a decent clip. solid post game. He might even put it all together and be a really good offensive contributor. On defense...he still doesn't fully understand what the opponent is doing yet so he anticipates poorly. <--which is 95% of defense (reading the offense). But he does have the size and athleticism to at least be a decent, or a net "neutral" defender.
And with Parker, it's so weird that he came to Chicago with a bad attitude - since he signe a 1 year contract - presumably a make good contract so that he could impress people enough to earn a big long-term contract. Even if he does well these last 30 or so games, I wouldn't trust that he'll keep it up in the future. Again, I hope I'm wrong.
doclinkin wrote:payitforward wrote:doclinkin wrote:
2 ACL tears make a difference there. Plus mindset attitude and immaturity. But. Modern medicine works miracles? Being on your last chance may wake you up? People mature?
We need a coach with defensive bonafides and fundamentals and a good scheme though otherwise there's no chance to develop good habits even if a player wanted to make a change.
Absolutely. I'm pulling for him.
OTOH, what have "mindset attitude and maturity" done for me, I ask you? Have I matured? No way. Modern medicine has been helpful, though, I can't argue with that. Along with easy access to mind-altering drugs.
Right. But on the other hand have you ever seen a $20m contract renewal about to evaporate in front of you? HIs agent is likely so far up his colon about it that he can hear him in his cochlear organ.
Ruzious wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:nate33 wrote:I don't doubt the offensive skills of either Portis or Parker. My concern is defense. Portis isn't going to go 12/14 every night, and when he isn't hitting, does his terrible D make him unplayable?
For the next 30 games, I'm going to be watching Portis and Parker solely on defense. I want to know if their bad defense throughout their career is just due to scheme and effort, or are they intrinsically horrible on D.
I had no idea Parker could pass like this.
There’s no physical reason why Parker can’t defend. He’s incredibly light on his feet for a player of that size/weight
It’s all mental for him, he has to want it, to change his reputation of being just a scorer.
I don't think he'll ever get defense - after watching him in Milwaukee. His defensive reactions are bewilderingly slow. It's like his brain shuts off when he's on defense.
"Drugs...gimme drugs."payitforward wrote:doclinkin wrote:payitforward wrote:Well there's no question about it! Watch him throughout his career. A guy doesn't go from being picked #2 in the draft to teetering on the edge of never putting on an NBA uniform again in only 4 years unless he really works at it.
.
2 ACL tears make a difference there. Plus mindset attitude and immaturity. But. Modern medicine works miracles? Being on your last chance may wake you up? People mature?
We need a coach with defensive bonafides and fundamentals and a good scheme though otherwise there's no chance to develop good habits even if a player wanted to make a change.
Absolutely. I'm pulling for him.
OTOH, what have "mindset attitude and maturity" done for me, I ask you? Have I matured? No way. Modern medicine has been helpful, though, I can't argue with that. Along with easy access to mind-altering drugs.
Is this about Ted and Ernie?doclinkin wrote:payitforward wrote:doclinkin wrote:
2 ACL tears make a difference there. Plus mindset attitude and immaturity. But. Modern medicine works miracles? Being on your last chance may wake you up? People mature?
We need a coach with defensive bonafides and fundamentals and a good scheme though otherwise there's no chance to develop good habits even if a player wanted to make a change.
Absolutely. I'm pulling for him.
OTOH, what have "mindset attitude and maturity" done for me, I ask you? Have I matured? No way. Modern medicine has been helpful, though, I can't argue with that. Along with easy access to mind-altering drugs.
Right. But on the other hand have you ever seen a $20m contract renewal about to evaporate in front of you? HIs agent is likely so far up his colon about it that he can hear him in his cochlear organ.
Illmatic12 wrote:Ruzious wrote:Illmatic12 wrote:There’s no physical reason why Parker can’t defend. He’s incredibly light on his feet for a player of that size/weight
It’s all mental for him, he has to want it, to change his reputation of being just a scorer.
I don't think he'll ever get defense - after watching him in Milwaukee. His defensive reactions are bewilderingly slow. It's like his brain shuts off when he's on defense.
Yeah I watched him in Milwaukee, one of the worse defenders I’ve ever seen. But then he was receiving praise for the way he defended in their playoff series vs Boston. Very peculiar player
And I gotta say, Parker made some passes last night that I did not think he had in his game.
There was a play where he caught the ball in the mid post, turned and whipped a one-motion *lefthanded* pass to the opposite corner for an Ariza three. He is a very interesting player at 23yo, still time for him to figure out what he can be.
Noted.queridiculo wrote:Induveca wrote:Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Portis
Buy while you can because his is the stock that will go sky high very very soon.
Sent from my SM-J337T using RealGM mobile app
Agreed nearly this entire board of old schoolers wanted Portis just a few years ago. He’s been stuck on arguably the worst team in the league.
This was not a doomsday return for chronic hip-injury Porter.
The Wizards could have re-signed Ariza for around $10 million a year and it would have been a bargain.
Then we could have just drafted Portis and addressed a real area of need.
Instead Grunfeld moved up in the lottery burning yet another draft pick in the process to pick Oubre, then ends up trading Oubre to bring back Ariza, then ends up trading Porter, a legit asset whether you like him or not, to add Portis for the final 28 games of the season.
So Grunfeld, and of course there's a good chance Ernie will overpay to bring back Portis, he's already thrown out his canned response about how they liked him the draft..
payitforward wrote:queridiculo wrote:Induveca wrote:
Agreed nearly this entire board of old schoolers wanted Portis just a few years ago. He’s been stuck on arguably the worst team in the league.
This was not a doomsday return for chronic hip-injury Porter.
The Wizards could have re-signed Ariza for around $10 million a year and it would have been a bargain.
Then we could have just drafted Portis and addressed a real area of need.
Instead Grunfeld moved up in the lottery burning yet another draft pick in the process to pick Oubre, then ends up trading Oubre to bring back Ariza, then ends up trading Porter, a legit asset whether you like him or not, to add Portis for the final 28 games of the season.
So Grunfeld, and of course there's a good chance Ernie will overpay to bring back Portis, he's already thrown out his canned response about how they liked him the draft..
I'm Grunfeld's biggest critic. I've been calling for him to be fired since 2011. But, sorry Induveca & Queridiculo, this business about the 2015 draft is BS.
For one thing it's hindsight.
For another, not every move that doesn't work out is a bad move. LIfe is like that.
For a third, if you're going to look back & ask what the best move would have been, then you're still wrong. Picking Bobby Portis would certainly not have been the best move. Not nearly the best move. Take a minute & ask yourself what the alternative might be. Without looking up that draft, please.
I'll put it in a spoiler to help you learn how little you know.How many of you "experts" even knew that the player(s) I just named was(were) in the same draft with Portis? How many of you mentioned that(those) guy(s) as a target at the time?Spoiler:
Here's how many -- ONE. CCJ.
& me. That's it.
As I say, I'm Grunfeld's biggest critic. I'm not defending him. I doubt there have been 3 worse GMs in the last 20 years.
Edit: that was kinda harsh. I'm sorry, guys -- has nothing to do w/ you. All on me being in a particularly bad mood this a.m.
penbeast0 wrote:payitforward wrote:queridiculo wrote:
The Wizards could have re-signed Ariza for around $10 million a year and it would have been a bargain.
Then we could have just drafted Portis and addressed a real area of need.
Instead Grunfeld moved up in the lottery burning yet another draft pick in the process to pick Oubre, then ends up trading Oubre to bring back Ariza, then ends up trading Porter, a legit asset whether you like him or not, to add Portis for the final 28 games of the season.
So Grunfeld, and of course there's a good chance Ernie will overpay to bring back Portis, he's already thrown out his canned response about how they liked him the draft..
I'm Grunfeld's biggest critic. I've been calling for him to be fired since 2011. But, sorry Induveca & Queridiculo, this business about the 2015 draft is BS.
For one thing it's hindsight.
For another, not every move that doesn't work out is a bad move. LIfe is like that.
For a third, if you're going to look back & ask what the best move would have been, then you're still wrong. Picking Bobby Portis would certainly not have been the best move. Not nearly the best move. Take a minute & ask yourself what the alternative might be. Without looking up that draft, please.
I'll put it in a spoiler to help you learn how little you know.How many of you "experts" even knew that the player(s) I just named was(were) in the same draft with Portis? How many of you mentioned that(those) guy(s) as a target at the time?Spoiler:
Here's how many -- ONE. CCJ.
& me. That's it.
As I say, I'm Grunfeld's biggest critic. I'm not defending him. I doubt there have been 3 worse GMs in the last 20 years.
Edit: that was kinda harsh. I'm sorry, guys -- has nothing to do w/ you. All on me being in a particularly bad mood this a.m.
If I remember it, Looney was the one the board wanted if Portis was gone at that point in terms of consensus. People liked Nance, just not that early. Don't remember hearing anyone rave about Harrell.