ImageImageImage

Future of PG position (in MIN)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
Killboard
Analyst
Posts: 3,374
And1: 943
Joined: Jul 16, 2010

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#121 » by Killboard » Tue Feb 5, 2019 8:44 pm

Jedzz wrote:
shrink wrote:
Killboard wrote:Tyus projected to be worth 190M over the next 5 seasons.


https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/carmelo/tyus-jones

I really like Tyus and this is probably overrating him by a good margin, but I dont have any doubts he will overplay his next contract

Awesome Killboard! Thanks for posting that!


I love that they named it the CARMELO Projections. Aside from that, I have a hard time believing much in this stuff about him. The probability of chance variation alone, on this team, I just can't. But in Wins Above Replacement Projection it's showing a drop off from him next season, before a claim that he takes off in 2020 to heights never before reached. Then it has him peaking there for 3 years and falling off below replacement level again by 2023.

If his play drops off any further next season, he's probably out of the NBA according to most teams. Maybe not if we sign him to a long term deal, but would any other team put up with less than where he is at right now? I know a few people love to point to his steal to turnover ratio or whatever, but I'm sorry that's just not enough of a game to compete with.

He can't be relied upon to shoot or block. His assists aren't off the charts hinting at anything great to me. I realize his usage has been low and maybe if he starts with consistent high minutes he reaches another level. But I just don't believe any of it will be enough unless he can learn to shoot a basketball at respectable consistency. No one will respect him enough to keep playing him high minutes.

I think this 538 crew are as bright as they come, and yet I think they have a problem sometimes relating numbers to a human factor. We humans absolutely do weight some types of production numbers over others. His opponents won't respect him enough to defend him judiciously because of that shot problem. That will hurt his teams overall. I just don't see it until he proves otherwise because I believe he's had enough chances to show us and he hasn't. He doesn't have to put up 20 pts. But he does have to show he's a threat if left alone. He has not. Loved the display of data at that site. Magicians.



Last season he had .570 TS. This season he started to shot really bad but as a late he was coming on his own before he felt injured, to me was a matter of confidence.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,764
And1: 5,251
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#122 » by minimus » Sun Feb 10, 2019 8:40 am

When Tyus and Rose got injured I started to watch games of other teams. Here my couple of thoughts based on my observation.

The way our roster constructed we MUST have a ball handler AND quality shot creator at PG position. Let me explain. Our core is KAT-RoCo-Wiggins. None of them is a quality shot creator. KAT is an elite shot maker, maybe the best in the league along bigmen, but he is not at the same level of team impact as Jokic. RoCo is very limited ball handler, slasher. Same story with Wiggins. However, the biggest problem to me is lack of execution. We can survive lack of ball handlers if we can execute as team, i.e. have decent, experienced passers at all positions. Biggest improvement here might be insertion of Saric in starting lineup and more minutes for Tyus. However, it might be disaster because KAT-Saric-RoCo-Wiggins-Tyus lineup won't have elite shot creator, ballhandler. For instance, UTA uses Ingles, Mitchell, Rubio as ball handlers, passers AND shooters at wings to make their offence work. Here comes Rose. His combination of experience, shooting efficiency and still elite slashing ability complement Tyus as much any other player in the league. This combination have been our cheat code: we survived in defence with Tyus and executed well with him in offense, while against bench player Rose scored efficiently. That have been our recipe for success.

How we can improve? IMO there are three ways

1) Unrealistic. Get an elite PG on the market. Holiday, Conley check all boxes for us.
2) Realistic. Re-sign both Rose and Tyus. Trade Teague, get quality shooters at wings AND limit Wiggins inefficient minutes. If I imagine Wiggins keeping shooting that bricks now, there is no real backup at SG, I wish Okogie and Terrell were the answer, but they are still raw. However, if we add someone like Ellington then we can survive Wiggins bad night by better execution getting open looks to KAT, RoCo, Saric and other shooters.
3) get an elite 3&D wing and lockdown perimeter. Danny Green, Avery Bradley might be available they can give us spark in defense, without much sacrificing offense.

Saying this I think it is more on GM than Ryan. I like his coaching, but asking him to win now it is like asking for miracle. I don't believe miracles if there is no serious work done beforehand by whole organisation. Injuries are bad luck, but look at LAC: West and Balmer have done a great job, being proactive. In our case I see only reactive approach.
wolfen
Senior
Posts: 703
And1: 216
Joined: Apr 05, 2014
     

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#123 » by wolfen » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:46 am

minimus wrote:When Tyus and Rose got injured I started to watch games of other teams. Here my couple of thoughts based on my observation.

The way our roster constructed we MUST have a ball handler AND quality shot creator at PG position. Let me explain. Our core is KAT-RoCo-Wiggins. None of them is a quality shot creator. KAT is an elite shot maker, maybe the best in the league along bigmen, but he is not at the same level of team impact as Jokic. RoCo is very limited ball handler, slasher. Same story with Wiggins. However, the biggest problem to me is lack of execution. We can survive lack of ball handlers if we can execute as team, i.e. have decent, experienced passers at all positions. Biggest improvement here might be insertion of Saric in starting lineup and more minutes for Tyus. However, it might be disaster because KAT-Saric-RoCo-Wiggins-Tyus lineup won't have elite shot creator, ballhandler. For instance, UTA uses Ingles, Mitchell, Rubio as ball handlers, passers AND shooters at wings to make their offence work. Here comes Rose. His combination of experience, shooting efficiency and still elite slashing ability complement Tyus as much any other player in the league. This combination have been our cheat code: we survived in defence with Tyus and executed well with him in offense, while against bench player Rose scored efficiently. That have been our recipe for success.

How we can improve? IMO there are three ways

1) Unrealistic. Get an elite PG on the market. Holiday, Conley check all boxes for us.
2) Realistic. Re-sign both Rose and Tyus. Trade Teague, get quality shooters at wings AND limit Wiggins inefficient minutes. If I imagine Wiggins keeping shooting that bricks now, there is no real backup at SG, I wish Okogie and Terrell were the answer, but they are still raw. However, if we add someone like Ellington then we can survive Wiggins bad night by better execution getting open looks to KAT, RoCo, Saric and other shooters.
3) get an elite 3&D wing and lockdown perimeter. Danny Green, Avery Bradley might be available they can give us spark in defense, without much sacrificing offense.

Saying this I think it is more on GM than Ryan. I like his coaching, but asking him to win now it is like asking for miracle. I don't believe miracles if there is no serious work done beforehand by whole organisation. Injuries are bad luck, but look at LAC: West and Balmer have done a great job, being proactive. In our case I see only reactive approach.


Very. Well. Said. We already had one of the best pass first PG's in the league in Rubio over the last few years, how did that one go? Imagine a Rubio-led Utah without the playmaking of EITHER Mitchell or Ingles? I'm not here to bash Rubio, but rather to back up your point that a PG who can carry his load offensively, space the floor, and use his quicks to draw defenders to get others involved (3 things a healthy Rose has done well this year) makes a HUGE difference and especially with the non-playmaking Cov and Wigs, it's vital. Scoring PG's don't have to be ball hogs, they just need to be professional scorers at their position. Push the ball, penetrate, draw the D, score, hit the 3. Hit the open man when attention comes. Lather, rinse, repeat.

In fact, if I could have 2 PG's on the floor at once without suffering defensively, I'd do it as much as I could. Wiggins is such a problem in this scenario because he's the opposite of what a Pg is. That being said, I am going to put a little heat on Ryan Saunders. Early on we heard of practices where long 2's were penalized. Yet here we are, the same Wiggins, chucking long 2's with no fear of a benching, no fear of benching for all of the Wiggy stuff that happens all the time, ugh. Let me just say that if Wigs is here for next few years, if I'm running things I demand that he puts on 20 pounds of muscle so he can maximize getting to the rim, finishing, and not getting stripped of the ball. If he could then see how much better he is at that, maybe he wouldn't settle for the long 2's, and maybe guys would sag off of him, giving him a little cushion from 3. And of course that added muscle would make him a better rebounder and defender.

It would never happen, but if I could add 2 players from the draft this summer, it would be Coby White and Nickiel Alexander-Walker. NAW is an 2 guard with PG like instincts, a great on ball defender, willing ball mover, ambidextrous ball handler, great from 3, and scores well from other areas of the floor too. And of course Coby is the scoring PG that could be the player you're talking about. Give those 2 young guns 2 years to develop and play together and run the team and co-pilots. Pipe dream, I know. But again, great post...
Rookie-Mistake
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,435
And1: 523
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
       

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#124 » by Rookie-Mistake » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:52 am

Is there any love for trying to lure Kemba Walker to the Wolves? He has been on that friendly $12 mil a year contract for a few years and becomes a UFA this year. I would love him on the team, has the right intensity, can hit threes and bring other players into the game... He is 28 and probably wants to get paid, but heck, we're paying DIENG 17 mil next season FFS and he is an outright DUD!
User avatar
GI_Slow
Pro Prospect
Posts: 771
And1: 381
Joined: Jul 08, 2014
Location: Valdivia, Chile
     

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#125 » by GI_Slow » Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:07 am

Rookie-Mistake wrote:Is there any love for trying to lure Kemba Walker to the Wolves? He has been on that friendly $12 mil a year contract for a few years and becomes a UFA this year. I would love him on the team, has the right intensity, can hit threes and bring other players into the game... He is 28 and probably wants to get paid, but heck, we're paying DIENG 17 mil next season FFS and he is an outright DUD!


I'd love to get him here, KAT and him would make for a stud combo, there are of course pros and cons to even get it done though. Think the only way to get him is through sign and trade if not mistaken.

Pros:
- All star caliber player in a position of need.
- Considering he's spent all of his career in Charlotte, if he was to move he'd probably want to go to a franchise that wants to compete and needs a starting PG, not many places do, but we're one of the few.
- Hypothetically Charlotte wouldn't want to blow it all up if he leaves, if we take into account that they have spent most of their years in the lottery, even if it means getting stuck on the treadmill, plus the east is as free as it gets currently to make playoffs, so they could be ok taking Teague or Gorgui back (Teague makes the most sense for them, Gorgui while overpaid and all, has the ability to be a bottom tier starter if given the minutes).

Cons:
- Kemba has been super loyal to the Hornets, so maybe even the thought of leaving is unrealistic.
- There are a lot of teams with huge cap space, including tempting destinations like NY & LA
- His age might be a bit of an issue if signed to a big deal, as he will be 29 when he hits FA.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,528
And1: 30,961
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#126 » by Domejandro » Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:13 am

Rookie-Mistake wrote:Is there any love for trying to lure Kemba Walker to the Wolves? He has been on that friendly $12 mil a year contract for a few years and becomes a UFA this year. I would love him on the team, has the right intensity, can hit threes and bring other players into the game... He is 28 and probably wants to get paid, but heck, we're paying DIENG 17 mil next season FFS and he is an outright DUD!

I might be a top-five Kemba fan on the forum, but....

1. How would Minnesota get the cap-space to sign him?
2. Why in the hell would Kemba Walker go to Minnesota over all of the other options?
wolfen
Senior
Posts: 703
And1: 216
Joined: Apr 05, 2014
     

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#127 » by wolfen » Mon Feb 11, 2019 5:05 pm

To build on Minimus' comments about our wings not being setup guys or guys who can consistently get into the paint and do damage, not that he's a PG, but I think a sneaky good FA signing this off-season would be Tomas Satoransky. He's got a great all around game, still only 27, has ample size to play the wing, but does a lot of point-guardy stuff as well. 4 assists per game from the 2 guard position playing 24 mpg. He's a career 42% 3 point shooter as well, hustles, and plays hard. He would add to the overall play-making and ball handling of our wings (Cov, Wigs, and Okogie, ugh) that we so desperately need. The Wiz have his bird rights (restricted), so it might be hard to pry him away, but he is the PERFECT player that this team needs, and an overpay might be worth it. Wonder what kind of deal it would take to sign him for 3-4 years? Great article about how he's been the glue in the Wizards locker room: https://www.theringer.com/nba/2019/1/9/18174431/tomas-satoransky-washington-wizards-profile

The fact he can and does play either guard position enhances his value even further. So if you're talking PG this off-season, reality says that Teague will be back. Draft Coby White as your scoring, future PG. Sign Satoransky as your swing guy at the 2 and the 1. No need to re-sign either Tyus or the likely broken down Rose. If Teague plays sh@tty you give the rook a shot at starting at PG. If the rook isn't ready then Satoransky can spot start. Plus, you can always bring in guys like Canaan or Bayless in desperate situations to keep the boat afloat.

This plan would save money (not having to re-sign Rose, who'll want more money, not having to re-sign Tyus, who will certainly get offered more by other teams that we'd have to match), address the PG situation in the here and now, and also into the future. AND give our wing corps a needed play-maker who plays hard and nails 3's.
User avatar
Killboard
Analyst
Posts: 3,374
And1: 943
Joined: Jul 16, 2010

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#128 » by Killboard » Mon Feb 11, 2019 5:17 pm

wolfen wrote:To build on Minimus' comments about our wings not being setup guys or guys who can consistently get into the paint and do damage, not that he's a PG, but I think a sneaky good FA signing this off-season would be Tomas Satoransky. He's got a great all around game, still only 27, has ample size to play the wing, but does a lot of point-guardy stuff as well. 4 assists per game from the 2 guard position playing 24 mpg. He's a career 42% 3 point shooter as well, hustles, and plays hard. He would add to the overall play-making and ball handling of our wings (Cov, Wigs, and Okogie, ugh) that we so desperately need. The Wiz have his bird rights (restricted), so it might be hard to pry him away, but he is the PERFECT player that this team needs, and an overpay might be worth it. Wonder what kind of deal it would take to sign him for 3-4 years? Great article about how he's been the glue in the Wizards locker room: https://www.theringer.com/nba/2019/1/9/18174431/tomas-satoransky-washington-wizards-profile

The fact he can and does play either guard position enhances his value even further. So if you're talking PG this off-season, reality says that Teague will be back. Draft Coby White as your scoring, future PG. Sign Satoransky as your swing guy at the 2 and the 1. No need to re-sign either Tyus or the likely broken down Rose. If Teague plays sh@tty you give the rook a shot at starting at PG. If the rook isn't ready then Satoransky can spot start. Plus, you can always bring in guys like Canaan or Bayless in desperate situations to keep the boat afloat.

This plan would save money (not having to re-sign Rose, who'll want more money, not having to re-sign Tyus, who will certainly get offered more by other teams that we'd have to match), address the PG situation in the here and now, and also into the future. AND give our wing corps a needed play-maker who plays hard and nails 3's.



If Teague ops in the only wolves can offer for him is the MLE around 9M. Almost all teams can offer that and washington can match that. And we are going to need a 4 wing too, which IMO is a bigger hole than a 3rd PG.

Tyus in the other hand should be resigned, probably for less than that, even if we want to use him as a trade chip.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,616
And1: 22,978
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#129 » by Klomp » Tue Feb 12, 2019 4:53 am

Rookie-Mistake wrote:Is there any love for trying to lure Kemba Walker to the Wolves? He has been on that friendly $12 mil a year contract for a few years and becomes a UFA this year. I would love him on the team, has the right intensity, can hit threes and bring other players into the game... He is 28 and probably wants to get paid, but heck, we're paying DIENG 17 mil next season FFS and he is an outright DUD!

Our best chance would've been to try and trade for him, but now he about to get paid!
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,764
And1: 5,251
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#130 » by minimus » Tue Feb 12, 2019 10:16 am

After todays game I am contemplating following solution for our wing/PG situation based ariund veterans and young players and without big FAs. Deng, Bayless performance makes me wonder if we can use following strategy in future. Also Okogie is one of examples of player hitting rookie wall hard. Not surprising at all. But even with injection of draft talent and following development of Okogie, Tyus, Saric, we need veterans. Deng has just showed that basketball IQ and experience is still the biggest problem with this team.

1) resign Tyus. Critical move to stabilize PG position, move forward from Teague, facilitate transition to organized offense without Rose.
2) actively shop Teague all offseason and season. trade him before deadline
3) sign a group of veterans to compliment our young: players Garrett Temple(vetmin), Deng (vetmin), AT(vetmin) check all boxes for us. Resign Rose for vetmin. I doubt that he will get more for these reasons: for developing teams he cant play regular season on the same level to build chemistry around and for playoff team he will definetely has no value because he almost 100% would not be able play in that schedule in playoff (82 games + intensity is up, no time to recover) Idk if we can afford these contracts financialy with Teague opting in and Gibson and Bayless
4) Draft BPA with potential
5) Invest time in developing a young bigman with potential, lets say Marquese Chriss or Dragan Bender on 3yrs partially guaranteed deal.

KAT/Dieng/Bender
Saric/Bender/AT
RoCo/Temple/Deng
Wiggins/Okogie/Temple
Teague/Tyus/Rose
ronnierarko
Sophomore
Posts: 120
And1: 104
Joined: Nov 04, 2018

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#131 » by ronnierarko » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:21 pm

minimus wrote:1) resign Tyus. Critical move to stabilize PG position, move forward from Teague, facilitate transition to organized offense without Rose.
2) actively shop Teague all offseason and season. trade him before deadline
3) sign a group of veterans to compliment our young: players Garrett Temple(vetmin), Deng (vetmin), AT(vetmin) check all boxes for us. Resign Rose for vetmin. I doubt that he will get more for these reasons: for developing teams he cant play regular season on the same level to build chemistry around and for playoff team he will definetely has no value because he almost 100% would not be able play in that schedule in playoff (82 games + intensity is up, no time to recover) Idk if we can afford these contracts financialy with Teague opting in and Gibson and Bayless
4) Draft BPA with potential
5) Invest time in developing a young bigman with potential, lets say Marquese Chriss or Dragan Bender on 3yrs partially guaranteed deal.

KAT/Dieng/Bender
Saric/Bender/AT
RoCo/Temple/Deng
Wiggins/Okogie/Temple
Teague/Tyus/Rose


I think we need to be real here. Rose will have suitors, and will have much more than the vet min put on the table for him this off-season. Of the guards you listed in your "potential lineup" for the Wolves, he's better than every single one.

Bender & Chriss are also really, really bad.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,764
And1: 5,251
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#132 » by minimus » Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:22 pm

ronnierarko wrote:
minimus wrote:1) resign Tyus. Critical move to stabilize PG position, move forward from Teague, facilitate transition to organized offense without Rose.
2) actively shop Teague all offseason and season. trade him before deadline
3) sign a group of veterans to compliment our young: players Garrett Temple(vetmin), Deng (vetmin), AT(vetmin) check all boxes for us. Resign Rose for vetmin. I doubt that he will get more for these reasons: for developing teams he cant play regular season on the same level to build chemistry around and for playoff team he will definetely has no value because he almost 100% would not be able play in that schedule in playoff (82 games + intensity is up, no time to recover) Idk if we can afford these contracts financialy with Teague opting in and Gibson and Bayless
4) Draft BPA with potential
5) Invest time in developing a young bigman with potential, lets say Marquese Chriss or Dragan Bender on 3yrs partially guaranteed deal.

KAT/Dieng/Bender
Saric/Bender/AT
RoCo/Temple/Deng
Wiggins/Okogie/Temple
Teague/Tyus/Rose


I think we need to be real here. Rose will have suitors, and will have much more than the vet min put on the table for him this off-season. Of the guards you listed in your "potential lineup" for the Wolves, he's better than every single one.

Bender & Chriss are also really, really bad.


Rose is not an "ordinary FA", money should be big factor for him, also I doubt that teams will offer any significant contract to a player a player who cant stay healthy (only 40 games from 56 so far). What he might seek is consistent PT to be in shape, and good situation without pressure from media and fans. I dont see CHI making big offer to him next season, so I think that MIN has chances to re-sign him for vetmin.

You are right, Bender & Chriss are bad. But can they improve if they change scenario? I doubt that PHO have done a good job at developing them. Developing two bigmen without real PG, tanking at the same time sounds like a bad idea.

I feel really bad for Nunnally, it seems that he never got chance to play. I am afraid that now our chances to attract even euro players are so small.
wolfen
Senior
Posts: 703
And1: 216
Joined: Apr 05, 2014
     

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#133 » by wolfen » Thu May 9, 2019 1:59 pm

Digging this thread back up now that we have a new sheriff in town in Rosas...

A couple of recent Rosas comments (loosely)...
-We'll be playing a more modern game of basketball.
-We'll be updating our shot selection based on that.

Yes, we all want a shiny new kick-ass PG (the subject of this thread), but I am thinking that the Rosas hire COULD be a very good thing for Teague. If we truly are going to play a pace and space game, you would hope to see less of Teague walking the ball up, pounding the rock in the half-court, passing up open 3's, and also not attacking the paint. JT's best games last year were the ones where he stopped thinking and just played, attacked, and shot the open 3 without hesitation. I remember JT talking about emphasizing running the offense and setting guys up first and foremost, in last year's offense, which remember, was really Thibs' offense. Saunders made a few tweaks but didn't change things a ton, certainly not Teague's role.

I would bet at least THREE dozen donuts that Teague looks a lot better next year, and the team as a result. Because of that, we'll have a high-value trade chip at the deadline if we so choose to use it. Thoughts on the Rosas effect on Teague?
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,369
And1: 6,386
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#134 » by KGdaBom » Thu May 9, 2019 4:08 pm

wolfen wrote:Digging this thread back up now that we have a new sheriff in town in Rosas...

A couple of recent Rosas comments (loosely)...
-We'll be playing a more modern game of basketball.
-We'll be updating our shot selection based on that.

Yes, we all want a shiny new kick-ass PG (the subject of this thread), but I am thinking that the Rosas hire COULD be a very good thing for Teague. If we truly are going to play a pace and space game, you would hope to see less of Teague walking the ball up, pounding the rock in the half-court, passing up open 3's, and also not attacking the paint. JT's best games last year were the ones where he stopped thinking and just played, attacked, and shot the open 3 without hesitation. I remember JT talking about emphasizing running the offense and setting guys up first and foremost, in last year's offense, which remember, was really Thibs' offense. Saunders made a few tweaks but didn't change things a ton, certainly not Teague's role.

I would bet at least THREE dozen donuts that Teague looks a lot better next year, and the team as a result. Because of that, we'll have a high-value trade chip at the deadline if we so choose to use it. Thoughts on the Rosas effect on Teague?

It has always been my contention that Teague is an above average PG. However, his latest injuries of hangnails, headaches, and stubbed pinky toes are really piling up. IF we get a shot at a good PG in the draft I think we need to make that pick.
wolfen
Senior
Posts: 703
And1: 216
Joined: Apr 05, 2014
     

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#135 » by wolfen » Thu May 9, 2019 4:35 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
wolfen wrote:Digging this thread back up now that we have a new sheriff in town in Rosas...

A couple of recent Rosas comments (loosely)...
-We'll be playing a more modern game of basketball.
-We'll be updating our shot selection based on that.

Yes, we all want a shiny new kick-ass PG (the subject of this thread), but I am thinking that the Rosas hire COULD be a very good thing for Teague. If we truly are going to play a pace and space game, you would hope to see less of Teague walking the ball up, pounding the rock in the half-court, passing up open 3's, and also not attacking the paint. JT's best games last year were the ones where he stopped thinking and just played, attacked, and shot the open 3 without hesitation. I remember JT talking about emphasizing running the offense and setting guys up first and foremost, in last year's offense, which remember, was really Thibs' offense. Saunders made a few tweaks but didn't change things a ton, certainly not Teague's role.

I would bet at least THREE dozen donuts that Teague looks a lot better next year, and the team as a result. Because of that, we'll have a high-value trade chip at the deadline if we so choose to use it. Thoughts on the Rosas effect on Teague?

It has always been my contention that Teague is an above average PG. However, his latest injuries of hangnails, headaches, and stubbed pinky toes are really piling up. IF we get a shot at a good PG in the draft I think we need to make that pick.


Not disagreeing with that at all, I just think that Teague should benefit from a more modern style and philosophy is all, which is a good thing. You put an aggressive, free-wheeling JT on the floor along-side a guy like Coby White (in certain lineups) and you've got some serious weaponry in the backcourt that teams would have to contend with. Which would open things up for KAT to do his thing and hopefully space the floor for open 3's. Covington's stroke is a given, hopefully, Wigs and Okogie shoot a bajillion 3's this off-season, they'll need to be ready to hit the ground running from behind the arc!
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,764
And1: 5,251
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#136 » by minimus » Thu May 16, 2019 9:45 am

wolfen wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
wolfen wrote:Digging this thread back up now that we have a new sheriff in town in Rosas...

A couple of recent Rosas comments (loosely)...
-We'll be playing a more modern game of basketball.
-We'll be updating our shot selection based on that.

Yes, we all want a shiny new kick-ass PG (the subject of this thread), but I am thinking that the Rosas hire COULD be a very good thing for Teague. If we truly are going to play a pace and space game, you would hope to see less of Teague walking the ball up, pounding the rock in the half-court, passing up open 3's, and also not attacking the paint. JT's best games last year were the ones where he stopped thinking and just played, attacked, and shot the open 3 without hesitation. I remember JT talking about emphasizing running the offense and setting guys up first and foremost, in last year's offense, which remember, was really Thibs' offense. Saunders made a few tweaks but didn't change things a ton, certainly not Teague's role.

I would bet at least THREE dozen donuts that Teague looks a lot better next year, and the team as a result. Because of that, we'll have a high-value trade chip at the deadline if we so choose to use it. Thoughts on the Rosas effect on Teague?

It has always been my contention that Teague is an above average PG. However, his latest injuries of hangnails, headaches, and stubbed pinky toes are really piling up. IF we get a shot at a good PG in the draft I think we need to make that pick.


Not disagreeing with that at all, I just think that Teague should benefit from a more modern style and philosophy is all, which is a good thing. You put an aggressive, free-wheeling JT on the floor along-side a guy like Coby White (in certain lineups) and you've got some serious weaponry in the backcourt that teams would have to contend with. Which would open things up for KAT to do his thing and hopefully space the floor for open 3's. Covington's stroke is a given, hopefully, Wigs and Okogie shoot a bajillion 3's this off-season, they'll need to be ready to hit the ground running from behind the arc!


What if we give keys of offense to KAT/Saric combo and make Teague work as scorer?
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,764
And1: 5,251
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#137 » by minimus » Mon May 27, 2019 8:27 am

Read on Twitter


Glad that we are already working to improve our PG situation.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,914
And1: 1,078
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#138 » by Dewey » Wed May 29, 2019 3:47 pm

Mun's the word ... :wink:
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,931
And1: 2,548
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#139 » by Slim Tubby » Wed May 29, 2019 7:03 pm

Dewey wrote:Mun's the word ... :wink:



I'm more of metal head myself but Munford's sons play pretty good music! :D
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
wolfen
Senior
Posts: 703
And1: 216
Joined: Apr 05, 2014
     

Re: Future of PG position (in MIN) 

Post#140 » by wolfen » Mon Jun 24, 2019 4:20 pm

New idea - Quinn Cook as our new starting PG. He's a free agent, he might come to the wolves with the MLE if he's guaranteed the starting position. The fit makes me think he'd be a good candidate, plus, if he doesn't work out, there's next year's draft, heavy in PG's (you put him back on the bench). Why does it work? If Culver pans out to be a great distributor, you need a good shooting PG opposite him in the back court (Cook is a 42% 3 point shooter). Cook can also help run things, initiating, with Culver. He's battle tested, can play on or off the ball, he deserves a shot at a starting gig with an up and coming team. He's 6-2, bigger than you think he is, so he'd be fine guarding most 1's.

The reality is, is that we probably won't land D-Lo, and if we don't, we need a plan B for the PG position. If we're able to trade Teague before the season starts, Quinn is the starter. If not, you probably roll with Teague starting and consider trading him at the deadline, as he'll be an expiring and worth something at that point to a playoff team. We'd likely have to sign an additional backup vet PG to be the 3rd string guy, somebody like Tim Frazier, Michael Carter-Williams, or Shelvin Mack, guys who would come cheap and be insurance.

A decent scenario would be signing Cook & MCW (cheap, bigger PG to guard the bigger PG's) and Nowell shows he can accel in the combo guard role being an initiator. Remember, Culver really could be our main initator in a year or 2, a traditional PG may not be needed on this squad. And if D-Lo isn't signed there are other options that we need to consider, some that are outside of the box...

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves