It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,087
And1: 3,620
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#21 » by Foye » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:46 pm

I am at the point where I will rather watch the dead corpse of Luol Deng start.
13th Man
General Manager
Posts: 8,936
And1: 6,118
Joined: Feb 12, 2012
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#22 » by 13th Man » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:48 pm

Karate Diop wrote:How much of the blame do we give Minneosta for failing to develop Wiggins? And how much of it is on Wiggins?

I mean is there any doubt for example that if Sean Marks and Kenny Atkinson got 5 years of Wiggins that they would have gotten more out of him than the Wolves did? (Not saying it'd be a surefire home run he'd realize his potential as this isn't ALL on the Wolves and Wiggins is partially to blame, but it's interesting to discuss just what the split of culpability is)


I don't blame Minny for falling for hype by drafting him but I blame them big time for handing out the max extension. They should have known that his work ethics is focused more on playing video games then it is improving his game.
kuclas
General Manager
Posts: 7,750
And1: 3,965
Joined: Nov 08, 2016
     

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#23 » by kuclas » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:48 pm

He’s a overall #1 draft pick bust. But he’s not a bust. If he had been say number 15 overall pick. Being paid say 8 million a year with his extension. People wouldn’t say anything.
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 51,041
And1: 33,866
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#24 » by og15 » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:48 pm

BR0D1E86 wrote:
KAT4PREZ wrote:His perception lies on his max contract

It isn’t his fault Minny was dumb enough to max him

He’s not very good without the max contract factored in either. He shoots a lot inefficiently. He really literally does nothing else at a higher level than “poor.” And he hasn’t improved since a real minor bump after his rookie season.
Only thing I can think of is that maybe if he's making less, then the expectations are lowered, so he's molded into a lesser role that might maximize his positives and minimize his negatives?
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,087
And1: 3,620
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#25 » by Foye » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:49 pm

13th Man wrote:
Karate Diop wrote:How much of the blame do we give Minneosta for failing to develop Wiggins? And how much of it is on Wiggins?

I mean is there any doubt for example that if Sean Marks and Kenny Atkinson got 5 years of Wiggins that they would have gotten more out of him than the Wolves did? (Not saying it'd be a surefire home run he'd realize his potential as this isn't ALL on the Wolves and Wiggins is partially to blame, but it's interesting to discuss just what the split of culpability is)


I don't blame Minny for falling for hype by drafting him but I blame them big time for handing out the max extension. They should have known that his work ethics is focused more on playing video games then it is improving his game.


We never drafted him but yeah...his work ethic is poor.
User avatar
enigmatics
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,475
And1: 3,588
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
     

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#26 » by enigmatics » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:51 pm

Never understood the hype to begin with.
sean1913
Sophomore
Posts: 169
And1: 39
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
     

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#27 » by sean1913 » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:51 pm

yes. undoubtedly.. he was the #1 pick!!!!! and could have had his run of that MIN team as the alpha kid! he is NOT going to be a great player and as a number one pick if you don't turn into a great player then you are by def a bust. he is on a MAX contract and while he didn't offer it to himself, it creates another layer of expectation that he will NEVER live up to. 18PPG IS FINE but all the intangibles say he's not great. there's no argument here.
all the talent in the world and no heart equals nada
mplsfonz23
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,944
And1: 1,310
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#28 » by mplsfonz23 » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:56 pm

Michael Jordan wrote:
CelticsLV wrote:
Michael Jordan wrote:A bust isn't capable of putting up 20PPG over 5 seasons. Wiggins is just criminally overpaid.


His FGA per game is almost equal to his PPG. Dude is flat out trash(bust) if you take into account that he was picked first and the hype that surrounded him.

Yeah but a bust is generally someone who isn't even good enough to be in the league.

Look at Bennet, Thabeet, Vesley, Bender, and other top 10 picks who aren't even in the league anymore. They're not in the same category as Wiggins.


I agree. He was thrust into the #1 pick and had Embiid been healthy he might have been in a different position. #3 IMO.
Funny how most people that call him a bust are looking at stats. He doesn't look that good in game either, but I wouldn't lable him a bust. He's just getting more attention because of that contract. How many team would love to have him if he had a smaller contract? If he was making 14-18 million per, we wouldn't even have a thread like this. (Every week.)
User avatar
Bornstellar
General Manager
Posts: 9,688
And1: 23,164
Joined: Mar 05, 2018
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#29 » by Bornstellar » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:56 pm

This guy had so much hype coming into the league. I remember when people were claiming him to be Canada's Jordan :lol: in that respect he is a bust. Yeah he can put up 20ppg on terrible efficiency while doing nothing else on the floor. Definitely a bust to me
NBAFan93
RealGM
Posts: 19,792
And1: 14,223
Joined: Dec 04, 2016

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#30 » by NBAFan93 » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:56 pm

He didn’t look like a bust when he was scoring 30 and 40 points against OKC this season. I think he’s just wildly inconsistent like a lot of these younger guys. He’s overpaid yes, but I don’t think Minny is the only team that would have given him that contract at the time.
User avatar
sixerswillrule
RealGM
Posts: 16,684
And1: 3,628
Joined: Jul 24, 2003
Location: Disappointment

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#31 » by sixerswillrule » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:57 pm

Michael Jordan wrote:
CelticsLV wrote:
Michael Jordan wrote:A bust isn't capable of putting up 20PPG over 5 seasons. Wiggins is just criminally overpaid.


His FGA per game is almost equal to his PPG. Dude is flat out trash(bust) if you take into account that he was picked first and the hype that surrounded him.

Yeah but a bust is generally someone who isn't even good enough to be in the league.

Look at Bennet, Thabeet, Vesley, Bender, and other top 10 picks who aren't even in the league anymore. They're not in the same category as Wiggins.


But that should depend on expectations. Obviously there was a huge difference in what was expected from those guys vs. Wiggins. I mean if Wiggins as a general consensus #1 pick in his draft is a borderline top 100 NBA player, you don't think that's a bust?
Rookie-Mistake
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,435
And1: 523
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
       

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#32 » by Rookie-Mistake » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:57 pm

Yep, I Lu has been amazing to watch from a contract/output perspective
Foye wrote:I am at the point where I will rather watch the dead corpse of Luol Deng start.


Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using RealGM mobile app
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,859
And1: 9,693
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#33 » by bstein14 » Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:58 pm

He should be on a 4 year $40-$50 million type deal and be a 3rd or 4th options scoring 14 to 15 a night and he'd be ok. He's not worthy of a top pick but he also isn't a complete bust like a Darko type pick. He's like a slightly less efficient Glen Robinson who I always thought was an empty stats type player.
TheAlchemist
General Manager
Posts: 8,971
And1: 8,702
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
   

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#34 » by TheAlchemist » Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:09 pm

Gee , Kwame Brown and Andrea Bargnani where not relevant to you I see.

No he's not a bust,

in fact I think he can improve in the right system / under the right coach.

But yes, he's way way way overpaid.
playoffs
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,821
And1: 3,663
Joined: Aug 29, 2013

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#35 » by playoffs » Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:19 pm

Karate Diop wrote:How much of the blame do we give Minneosta for failing to develop Wiggins? And how much of it is on Wiggins?

I mean is there any doubt for example that if Sean Marks and Kenny Atkinson got 5 years of Wiggins that they would have gotten more out of him than the Wolves did? (Not saying it'd be a surefire home run he'd realize his potential as this isn't ALL on the Wolves and Wiggins is partially to blame, but it's interesting to discuss just what the split of culpability is)


I don't know how he would do as a player under Sean Marks and Kenny Atkinson, but the one thing I know for sure is that you would be starting multiple threads with "Andrew BIG-GUNS" or some other weird nickname in the title.
Quentin
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,596
And1: 1,317
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#36 » by Quentin » Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:29 pm

I wouldn't call him a bust. He's overpaid by A LOT. Unfortunate for Minnesota but Glen Taylor is a complete buffoon of an owner.

Funny how Minn won their last 2 games without him and they looked really good. When he plays it changes the offense to iso and it's terrible. Wiggins thinks he's the man so pumps up a bunch of shots out of the flow of the offense. He should be the guy coming off the bench in that 6th spot.
life_saver
General Manager
Posts: 9,323
And1: 6,813
Joined: Nov 08, 2017

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#37 » by life_saver » Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:30 pm

48% TS is just terrible
User avatar
SlowPaced
RealGM
Posts: 12,708
And1: 17,487
Joined: Jan 28, 2013
Location: An Inconvenient Place
   

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#38 » by SlowPaced » Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:32 pm

Not a bust, but he's been a major disappointment. And outrageously overpaid.
Forbes
Analyst
Posts: 3,621
And1: 2,866
Joined: May 25, 2010
Location: Queens
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#39 » by Forbes » Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:36 pm

Not a bust, but he was overhyped and has all the tools to be great except for the drive to be great. But he’s an NBA player with a career avg of about 20 empty ppg that about it.
mplsfonz23
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,944
And1: 1,310
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#40 » by mplsfonz23 » Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:37 pm

sixerswillrule wrote:
Michael Jordan wrote:
CelticsLV wrote:
His FGA per game is almost equal to his PPG. Dude is flat out trash(bust) if you take into account that he was picked first and the hype that surrounded him.

Yeah but a bust is generally someone who isn't even good enough to be in the league.

Look at Bennet, Thabeet, Vesley, Bender, and other top 10 picks who aren't even in the league anymore. They're not in the same category as Wiggins.


But that should depend on expectations. Obviously there was a huge difference in what was expected from those guys vs. Wiggins. I mean if Wiggins as a general consensus #1 pick in his draft is a borderline top 100 NBA player, you don't think that's a bust?


Yeah but he wasn't the consensus #1. Embiid was going to be the first pick before the injury and Philly still took him 3rd overall. Wiggins and Parker were neck and neck for the #1 after that. And if you want to call Wiggins a bust, then why are we not talking about Parker? How many teams has he been on now.
Put money out of the picture, and look at the overall body of work, games actually PLAYED, and age, I think he still has time to grow into a better player. He's only 23 soon to be 24, how many players are in there prime at that age. Hell the pressure we put on 19 year olds now is ridiculous. I remember players stayed in college longer and looked better doing it. He's missed 3 games his entire career including the last 2, is playing improved D this year, and is working on his overall game.
His motor is his biggest enemy.

Return to The General Board