How bout them #ValleyBoyz though huh?
(Girlfriend and I in the background)

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
bwgood77 wrote:That's actually been the lineup I've been thinking they should start next year (or the rest of this year), especially if TJ is back (for the bench spark and scoring) and we don't sign a solid PF. Oubre is the best guy to play PF for rebounding and with his wingspan.
sunskerr wrote:bwgood77 wrote:That's actually been the lineup I've been thinking they should start next year (or the rest of this year), especially if TJ is back (for the bench spark and scoring) and we don't sign a solid PF. Oubre is the best guy to play PF for rebounding and with his wingspan.
Yep. It's the modern NBA. You don't pay a banger PF starter money and starter minutes. That would harm Ayton from a spacing perspective. You get a cheap PF (and they are cheap now) who can preferably handle physicality more to compliment a potential Warren/Oubre/Bridges rotational trio. In other words, it's sort of like what we're doing already with Bender, except preferably with someone who is better than Bender, or maybe Bender can start hitting some 3s next year.
Basically, the rotation of those 4 guys is supposed to be fluid, and minutes are allocated slightly more on matchup. Some nights one guy will get 28 mpg and other nights 34-36 mpg. It's not a black and white thing, where people are saying, "oh, we need to trade Warren and bring in x power forward and play him 36 mpg". No, that's wrong. There's enough minutes for them all, especially if Jackson is taken out the equation.
sunskerr wrote:bwgood77 wrote:That's actually been the lineup I've been thinking they should start next year (or the rest of this year), especially if TJ is back (for the bench spark and scoring) and we don't sign a solid PF. Oubre is the best guy to play PF for rebounding and with his wingspan.
Yep. It's the modern NBA. You don't pay a banger PF starter money and starter minutes. That would harm Ayton from a spacing perspective. You get a cheap PF (and they are cheap now) who can preferably handle physicality more to compliment a potential Warren/Oubre/Bridges rotational trio. In other words, it's sort of like what we're doing already with Bender, except preferably with someone who is better than Bender, or maybe Bender can start hitting some 3s next year.
Basically, the rotation of those 4 guys is supposed to be fluid, and minutes are allocated slightly more on matchup. Some nights one guy will get 28 mpg and other nights 34-36 mpg. It's not a black and white thing, where people are saying, "oh, we need to trade Warren and bring in x power forward and play him 36 mpg". No, that's wrong. There's enough minutes for them all, especially if Jackson is taken out the equation.
I've been thinking: are we really bad at rebounding or is it just cause we shoot much worse than league average providing more defensive rebounds to the other team?bwgood77 wrote:sunskerr wrote:bwgood77 wrote:That's actually been the lineup I've been thinking they should start next year (or the rest of this year), especially if TJ is back (for the bench spark and scoring) and we don't sign a solid PF. Oubre is the best guy to play PF for rebounding and with his wingspan.
Yep. It's the modern NBA. You don't pay a banger PF starter money and starter minutes. That would harm Ayton from a spacing perspective. You get a cheap PF (and they are cheap now) who can preferably handle physicality more to compliment a potential Warren/Oubre/Bridges rotational trio. In other words, it's sort of like what we're doing already with Bender, except preferably with someone who is better than Bender, or maybe Bender can start hitting some 3s next year.
Basically, the rotation of those 4 guys is supposed to be fluid, and minutes are allocated slightly more on matchup. Some nights one guy will get 28 mpg and other nights 34-36 mpg. It's not a black and white thing, where people are saying, "oh, we need to trade Warren and bring in x power forward and play him 36 mpg". No, that's wrong. There's enough minutes for them all, especially if Jackson is taken out the equation.
Yeah, I totally agree with all of this except we do need to improve overall on rebounding (though we did well here last night). I wouldn't even mind starting another PF and bringing two of those guys off the bench but still think there is room for 3. There will always be injuries and you need depth. A lot of teams have several wings.
To answer myself: we are 5th in Off Rebounding %, but 30th in Def Reb %, which is by far the most common rebound for your team in a game. So, yeah, we are bad at rebounding...MathiasPW wrote:I've been thinking: are we really bad at rebounding or is it just cause we shoot much worse than league average providing more defensive rebounds to the other team?bwgood77 wrote:sunskerr wrote:
Yep. It's the modern NBA. You don't pay a banger PF starter money and starter minutes. That would harm Ayton from a spacing perspective. You get a cheap PF (and they are cheap now) who can preferably handle physicality more to compliment a potential Warren/Oubre/Bridges rotational trio. In other words, it's sort of like what we're doing already with Bender, except preferably with someone who is better than Bender, or maybe Bender can start hitting some 3s next year.
Basically, the rotation of those 4 guys is supposed to be fluid, and minutes are allocated slightly more on matchup. Some nights one guy will get 28 mpg and other nights 34-36 mpg. It's not a black and white thing, where people are saying, "oh, we need to trade Warren and bring in x power forward and play him 36 mpg". No, that's wrong. There's enough minutes for them all, especially if Jackson is taken out the equation.
Yeah, I totally agree with all of this except we do need to improve overall on rebounding (though we did well here last night). I wouldn't even mind starting another PF and bringing two of those guys off the bench but still think there is room for 3. There will always be injuries and you need depth. A lot of teams have several wings.
Cause our lineups are not that much smaller than league average, as the big PFs become more and more scarce. So why would we suck so much, if there is no structural reason?
I'm sure there are advanced rebounding stats to look this up.
MathiasPW wrote:I've been thinking: are we really bad at rebounding or is it just cause we shoot much worse than league average providing more defensive rebounds to the other team?bwgood77 wrote:sunskerr wrote:
Yep. It's the modern NBA. You don't pay a banger PF starter money and starter minutes. That would harm Ayton from a spacing perspective. You get a cheap PF (and they are cheap now) who can preferably handle physicality more to compliment a potential Warren/Oubre/Bridges rotational trio. In other words, it's sort of like what we're doing already with Bender, except preferably with someone who is better than Bender, or maybe Bender can start hitting some 3s next year.
Basically, the rotation of those 4 guys is supposed to be fluid, and minutes are allocated slightly more on matchup. Some nights one guy will get 28 mpg and other nights 34-36 mpg. It's not a black and white thing, where people are saying, "oh, we need to trade Warren and bring in x power forward and play him 36 mpg". No, that's wrong. There's enough minutes for them all, especially if Jackson is taken out the equation.
Yeah, I totally agree with all of this except we do need to improve overall on rebounding (though we did well here last night). I wouldn't even mind starting another PF and bringing two of those guys off the bench but still think there is room for 3. There will always be injuries and you need depth. A lot of teams have several wings.
Cause our lineups are not that much smaller than league average, as the big PFs become more and more scarce. So why would we suck so much, if there is no structural reason?
I'm sure there are advanced rebounding stats to look this up.
Qwigglez wrote:The #ValleyBoyz have been 5-2 the last 7 games, beating the best Eastern Conference team in the Bucks and Western Conference team in the Warriors this week. Beating the Lebrakers was also nice.
How bout them #ValleyBoyz though huh?
(Girlfriend and I in the background)
bwgood77 wrote:One of the guys (from a pick) we traded to dump the Kurt Thomas contract goes at it against a guy we traded 3 1st for...
Chriss wanted no part of serge in this one. Brandon knight made an appearance as a peacemaker. Most productive thing he's done in years.bwgood77 wrote:One of the guys (from a pick) we traded to dump the Kurt Thomas contract goes at it against a guy we traded 3 1st for...
bhawk wrote:bwgood77 wrote:One of the guys (from a pick) we traded to dump the Kurt Thomas contract goes at it against a guy we traded 3 1st for...
I wish Ibaka would have connected on that punch... that's how much I don't like Chriss. What a waste of a pick. Bender too. I should thrown in Len while I'm at it. Jackson is on bust watch.
bwgood77 wrote:bhawk wrote:bwgood77 wrote:One of the guys (from a pick) we traded to dump the Kurt Thomas contract goes at it against a guy we traded 3 1st for...
I wish Ibaka would have connected on that punch... that's how much I don't like Chriss. What a waste of a pick. Bender too. I should thrown in Len while I'm at it. Jackson is on bust watch.
I like the guy's response watching courtside...