ImageImageImageImageImage

Hot Topic - Quite Frankly; All Things Frank

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23

What should the Knicks approach be with Frank

Try to develop until prime years (~26) - essentially hold until it's 100% clear what he is
45
30%
Hold and try to develop until the end of rookie contract
64
43%
Hold until season's end/middle of next season to make a decision
13
9%
Look to trade him now for assets and/or a salary dump
23
15%
Other
5
3%
 
Total votes: 150

User avatar
2010
RealGM
Posts: 37,558
And1: 42,767
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
       

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2141 » by 2010 » Tue Mar 12, 2019 10:24 pm

mrpoetryNmotion wrote:
2010 wrote:
mrpoetryNmotion wrote:
Frank certainly has a lot to work on, and really, there are shades between his ineptitude, Knox's ineptitude, and DSJ's to a lesser extent--strictly talking mental approach.

I'm generally with you, but I don't think bringing up Fiz helps your argument because dude has been D'Antoni level bad lately.

Mitch shines on his own, really. Same with IsoZo. I can't really think of any plays or anything Fiz has done to make them excel outside of putting them on the court. Trier is a bit more mature and isn't as rattled mentally...knows what he can/cannot do and is learning what he can and cannot get away with against NBA level athletes (he's getting blocked a lot of this year but he will figure it out). Frank and definitely Knox require a little more structure and they don't have the mental game to fight through developing on their own at this level, and it shows...but they're different, still, but I won't touch on that now. DSJ is a bit maddening because the dude just seems to take stretches of the game off at times despite him being very capable and very talented when he puts it together. So not sure whether to question his conditioning, his competitive fire, etc. but something is off...

Either way, Fiz is literally the dog in the burning house. We're tanking this year though, so I'm not as perturbed as I was when we were tanking for Denver or all those other teams who had our first round picks.


DSJ is different. I think his motor issues and inconsistency with effort is tied to conditioning. Remember our entire roster passed Fiz's harsh conditioning test he learned from the Riley regime. DSJ wasn't around for that. I think the offseason program they give him along with knowing he has to pass the conditioning test for next year will show us more about him. Even Noah Vonleh said the conditioning program he bought into here has allowed him to up his game.

Back to Frank/Fiz. So what about Dotson. Does Fiz get credit for him. Cuz he doesn't have the independent style game that Mitch or Trier has that allows them to get credit on their own. Dotson went from getting jerked around early, spot-minutes and garbage time. Yet he performed every time his # was called. He even has credited Fiz for constant communication which allowed him to stay ready for his opportunities. I also see Fiz calling plays for Dotson. He doesn't create his own shot. He gets ran off screens, curl plays, down-screens, he cuts backdoor, etc.

Does Fiz get credit for Dot? And I hope you don't reply with Dot's age as a reason for why Fiz doesn't deserve the credit, cuz that'd be cheap...


I don't view players in terms of age, but mental maturity...as in, do they know basketball--do they make the right basketball play, do they know what they can do or can't do, do they know what they can do against certain defenses, do they know when/how to take what the defense is giving them.

When it comes to Dot, my personal opinion is he should have gotten more burn last year because he didn't show the same issues or seem as helpless as Frank with regards to knowing how to play basketball or feeling confident in his decision making. When Dot wasn't performing well it was because he wasn't executing--hitting shots, really. Dot brings the effort; I can't say his defense has ever been below average. I will give credit to Fiz for giving him opportunities and for getting him the consistency to establish confidence and execute. I don't give Fiz credit for developing say, Dot's basketball acumen because I feel like he had a lot of that coming in. Have you ever seen Dot try and play outside himself? Timmy's been in this league how many years and the guy is pulling his number like he was Kobe. There is a difference, and I can say that I at least clearly saw that. I hope you agree with that or find that agreeable.

I view Mitch differently, because his basketball acumen isn't as well developed as Trier's or Dot's as they came out of college programs as upperclassmen and have at least shown that they know who they are (unlike Frank and Knox). Mitch is, to his credit (and perhap's to Fiz's credit as he isn't asking him to operate/play outside of his current comfort zone/capabilty level), excelling and is displaying some awesome instincts that can't quite be taught...like blocking permiter shooters as often as he does. Mitch is refining other skills that can/should be defined by just having an opportunity and being better conditioned. His role isn't as complex right now but his confidence is growing because his physical tools are superior, in addition to that instinct I spoke about earlier. If Fiz get's Mitch to the point where he is getting comfortable hitting mid-range jumpshots, developing a semblance of a post-up game, etc... then I'd give Fiz credit for that, for developing. I feel like Mitch has been handled properly (moreso than Knox and Frank and Mudiay and Timmy, and...), though, and perhaps that deserves props in its own way.

Generally, overall, I haven't seen good development chops out of Fiz in terms of getting/helping Frank and Knox to know who they are, what they can do, etc. Right now, Frank and Knox both have those issues, in addition to just not executing--hitting shots, making the right passes, etc. Knox showed that even when he was playing well. That's where Fiz needs to step his game up, in my opinion.


Yeah, I agree on the Dot part.

But regarding Mitch, Frank, Knox (and others). Next year you will see if they have been properly developed by Fiz if/when they attempt to flesh out their game and do some of the things in NBA games that they've been working on behind the scenes. I am confident we will see even more of a jump from Mitch and Knox. But Frank? I think he is who he is. A fringe NBA player. I think he should have been a 2nd round pick tbh and definitely not a lotto pick. And I no longer believe he is a PG at all.

But Frank's time to reveal what/who he is will come next season. There will be no more excuses. If he falters again I would really question people if they are still making a laundry list of excuses and blaming any and everyone but Frank for his own failures or lack of production. I think that's fair. Cuz if he doesn't improve once his rookie deal expires he will be lucky if he is still in the league.
Image

2024 Bubble Champs

1: Thompson | Nembhard | Smart
2: White | Wallace | Clark
3: Dort | Sharpe | Rupert
4: Wembanyama | Green | Bol
5: Gobert | Drummond | Mamukelashvili
Richard4444
RealGM
Posts: 10,414
And1: 7,208
Joined: Dec 28, 2018
Location: São Paulo, Brasil
   

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2142 » by Richard4444 » Tue Mar 12, 2019 10:30 pm

ny-n-md wrote:If Frank isn’t traded do we lose Dotson and Trier due to having to renounce rights to get 2 max slots? I heard this on a podcast and thought that was valuable information.


I dont think Dotson is in jeopardy. But if we get luck in the draft, it can be hard to keep Trier.

Durant,2Max FA: 70.5M
Noah,Lance: 7,5M
Frank,Knox,Dennis,Mitch: 15,5M
Dotson, 1,5
94 M and 7 playes in the book
Cap Space Left: 14M for rookie and more 4 players (or MRC).
Trier: 3,5M
MRC 3 players: 2,7M
Total 6,2M
Left for rookie Cap Hold: 7,8M (not enough for signing picks 1 to 3).

We would have to renunce his Cap Hold and use the Room Exception (5M) to bring him back. To do that, I think we would have to: 1) loose his birds rights; 2) give up about bring other players like Jordan (pipe dream), Vonleh, Mud (pipe nightmare) and Mario. 3) risk to loose Trier to other b higer bidder because he would be a Free Agent after renounce his Cap Hold.
BAF Brooklyn - Pre-Season NBA 2K Simulation 2023 Champions.

Brunson/Nembhard/Micic
IQ/Strus/Ben Sheppard
Butler/Nesmith/Watford
Batum/Boucher/Morris/
Embiid/Plumlee/Landale/
User avatar
mrpoetryNmotion
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,722
And1: 1,118
Joined: Jun 28, 2009
Location: Purgatory
     

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2143 » by mrpoetryNmotion » Tue Mar 12, 2019 10:45 pm

2010 wrote:
mrpoetryNmotion wrote:
2010 wrote:
DSJ is different. I think his motor issues and inconsistency with effort is tied to conditioning. Remember our entire roster passed Fiz's harsh conditioning test he learned from the Riley regime. DSJ wasn't around for that. I think the offseason program they give him along with knowing he has to pass the conditioning test for next year will show us more about him. Even Noah Vonleh said the conditioning program he bought into here has allowed him to up his game.

Back to Frank/Fiz. So what about Dotson. Does Fiz get credit for him. Cuz he doesn't have the independent style game that Mitch or Trier has that allows them to get credit on their own. Dotson went from getting jerked around early, spot-minutes and garbage time. Yet he performed every time his # was called. He even has credited Fiz for constant communication which allowed him to stay ready for his opportunities. I also see Fiz calling plays for Dotson. He doesn't create his own shot. He gets ran off screens, curl plays, down-screens, he cuts backdoor, etc.

Does Fiz get credit for Dot? And I hope you don't reply with Dot's age as a reason for why Fiz doesn't deserve the credit, cuz that'd be cheap...


I don't view players in terms of age, but mental maturity...as in, do they know basketball--do they make the right basketball play, do they know what they can do or can't do, do they know what they can do against certain defenses, do they know when/how to take what the defense is giving them.

When it comes to Dot, my personal opinion is he should have gotten more burn last year because he didn't show the same issues or seem as helpless as Frank with regards to knowing how to play basketball or feeling confident in his decision making. When Dot wasn't performing well it was because he wasn't executing--hitting shots, really. Dot brings the effort; I can't say his defense has ever been below average. I will give credit to Fiz for giving him opportunities and for getting him the consistency to establish confidence and execute. I don't give Fiz credit for developing say, Dot's basketball acumen because I feel like he had a lot of that coming in. Have you ever seen Dot try and play outside himself? Timmy's been in this league how many years and the guy is pulling his number like he was Kobe. There is a difference, and I can say that I at least clearly saw that. I hope you agree with that or find that agreeable.

I view Mitch differently, because his basketball acumen isn't as well developed as Trier's or Dot's as they came out of college programs as upperclassmen and have at least shown that they know who they are (unlike Frank and Knox). Mitch is, to his credit (and perhap's to Fiz's credit as he isn't asking him to operate/play outside of his current comfort zone/capabilty level), excelling and is displaying some awesome instincts that can't quite be taught...like blocking permiter shooters as often as he does. Mitch is refining other skills that can/should be defined by just having an opportunity and being better conditioned. His role isn't as complex right now but his confidence is growing because his physical tools are superior, in addition to that instinct I spoke about earlier. If Fiz get's Mitch to the point where he is getting comfortable hitting mid-range jumpshots, developing a semblance of a post-up game, etc... then I'd give Fiz credit for that, for developing. I feel like Mitch has been handled properly (moreso than Knox and Frank and Mudiay and Timmy, and...), though, and perhaps that deserves props in its own way.

Generally, overall, I haven't seen good development chops out of Fiz in terms of getting/helping Frank and Knox to know who they are, what they can do, etc. Right now, Frank and Knox both have those issues, in addition to just not executing--hitting shots, making the right passes, etc. Knox showed that even when he was playing well. That's where Fiz needs to step his game up, in my opinion.


Yeah, I agree on the Dot part.

But regarding Mitch, Frank, Knox (and others). Next year you will see if they have been properly developed by Fiz if/when they attempt to flesh out their game and do some of the things in NBA games that they've been working on behind the scenes. I am confident we will see even more of a jump from Mitch and Knox. But Frank? I think he is who he is. A fringe NBA player. I think he should have been a 2nd round pick tbh and definitely not a lotto pick. And I no longer believe he is a PG at all.

But Frank's time to reveal what/who he is will come next season. There will be no more excuses. If he falters again I would really question people if they are still making a laundry list of excuses and blaming any and everyone but Frank for his own failures or lack of production. I think that's fair. Cuz if he doesn't improve once his rookie deal expires he will be lucky if he is still in the league.


I agree about Frank. I wasn't a fan of the pick when it was made, but whatever. I don't think his ceiling was ever particularly that high...I never saw an all-star caliber player because I really saw no flashes on offense that hinted at such. I think he can be good role player if he executes--hits shots (which seems to be more confidence than form...but I remember there being something inconsistent with regards to when his release lined up with the height of his jump)-- defends well, and has the confidence to thread some nice passes, and make the right basketball play that you can't quite rely on, say, Trier to do. If he doesn't show much next year, then maybe you explore things then.

Watching Knox right now is like playing NBA Street back in the day with a player who didn't have the skill points to execute the moves you were trying to do. His finishing/strength around the rim is some of the worst I have ever seen. Sometimes, yeah he jumps from too far away, but other times I just have no good explanation for why he is trash around the basket. There was a sequence in the last game that summed it perfectly. He really needs to be benched. Nothing is quite working for him and I haven't seen too much structure for him outside of Fiz calling for the post-ups for him. The thing is you can clearly see that he has some physical tools to work with, especially once he gets stronger. In addition to just finishing, he needs to work on some hesitation, change of pace, head fakes, etc just from a skill standpoint. That is independent of the mental growth he sorely needs because he is playing outside of himself at the moment and then getting down on himself without contributing to other areas of the game.

We'll see though. I really don't know what to expect or what to be committed to at this point.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,985
And1: 45,735
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2144 » by GONYK » Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:02 pm

I'm not sure how a 20 year old can be borderline dominant on one end of the court, yet be a fringe NBA player.

Someone like Mudiay is fringe. He's not good at anything.

Fiz gets sh*t because both the data and the eye test will tell you Mudiay is terrible, yet Fiz gives him every opportunity to repeatedly fail.

Just because Fiz doesn't value what Frank brings enough to be consistent in his treatment of the kid doesn't mean that Frank doesn't bring anything.
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,441
And1: 27,123
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2145 » by Jalen Bluntson » Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:03 pm

It's so obvious that the only people dumb enough to believe Berman are Frank haters. This thread is a joke. No one said they were shopping Frank EXCEPT BERMAN!! FOH!! :lol:
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
ny-n-md
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,898
And1: 1,386
Joined: Dec 10, 2009
     

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2146 » by ny-n-md » Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:26 pm

Richard4444 wrote:
ny-n-md wrote:If Frank isn’t traded do we lose Dotson and Trier due to having to renounce rights to get 2 max slots? I heard this on a podcast and thought that was valuable information.


I dont think Dotson is in jeopardy. But if we get luck in the draft, it can be hard to keep Trier.

Durant,2Max FA: 70.5M
Noah,Lance: 7,5M
Frank,Knox,Dennis,Mitch: 15,5M
Dotson, 1,5
94 M and 7 playes in the book
Cap Space Left: 14M for rookie and more 4 players (or MRC).
Trier: 3,5M
MRC 3 players: 2,7M
Total 6,2M
Left for rookie Cap Hold: 7,8M (not enough for signing picks 1 to 3).

We would have to renunce his Cap Hold and use the Room Exception (5M) to bring him back. To do that, I think we would have to: 1) loose his birds rights; 2) give up about bring other players like Jordan (pipe dream), Vonleh, Mud (pipe nightmare) and Mario. 3) risk to loose Trier for other bidder because he would be a Free Agent after renounce his Cap Hold.

I think all of this is a compelling argument for trading Frank. We shall see. I would love to keep all of the kids.
JUST PLAY THE KIDS ALREADY!!!!!
drekwins
Head Coach
Posts: 7,288
And1: 4,692
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
     

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2147 » by drekwins » Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:32 pm

dakomish23 wrote:
drekwins wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:
You can focus on all of them.

Frank lost minutes to Jack and Sessions last year. He played less minutes with KP than LFT.

That’s inexcusable.

Who’s should the Knox mins go to?


That's not it. Knox needs to have some sort of consequence for not doing other things than shoot. He can't just keep throwing up his junk, playing halfass D, etc. If I'm developing a young guy, I create "games within the game." I tell him that he needs to get 1 Rebound, Ast, Stl or Blk to earn 3 shots. If he doesn't get the others, he can't shoot or he'll be taken out of the game. Something along those lines. Or he needs 1 Reb, Ast, Stl or Blk to earn 2.5 minutes of playing time. If he gets 5 rebounds, 1 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, he can only play 18 minutes max. There needs to be accountability and consequences. Of course, such a structure could be more complex. I'm just throwing things out there.


I’m not saying there shouldn’t be structure. I’m saying there should be all the opportunity. You can do both.


Okay... he has gotten the opportunity. Wheres the structure and discipline part?
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,776
And1: 48,745
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2148 » by dakomish23 » Wed Mar 13, 2019 12:35 am

drekwins wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:
drekwins wrote:
That's not it. Knox needs to have some sort of consequence for not doing other things than shoot. He can't just keep throwing up his junk, playing halfass D, etc. If I'm developing a young guy, I create "games within the game." I tell him that he needs to get 1 Rebound, Ast, Stl or Blk to earn 3 shots. If he doesn't get the others, he can't shoot or he'll be taken out of the game. Something along those lines. Or he needs 1 Reb, Ast, Stl or Blk to earn 2.5 minutes of playing time. If he gets 5 rebounds, 1 ast, 0 stl, 0 blk, he can only play 18 minutes max. There needs to be accountability and consequences. Of course, such a structure could be more complex. I'm just throwing things out there.


I’m not saying there shouldn’t be structure. I’m saying there should be all the opportunity. You can do both.


Okay... he has gotten the opportunity. Wheres the structure and discipline part?


Take that up with Flat.

Best coach Knick name in a while :lol:
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,765
And1: 12,712
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2149 » by Phish Tank » Wed Mar 13, 2019 12:44 am

GONYK wrote:I'm not sure how a 20 year old can be borderline dominant on one end of the court, yet be a fringe NBA player.

Someone like Mudiay is fringe. He's not good at anything.

Fiz gets sh*t because both the data and the eye test will tell you Mudiay is terrible, yet Fiz gives him every opportunity to repeatedly fail.

Just because Fiz doesn't value what Frank brings enough to be consistent in his treatment of the kid doesn't mean that Frank doesn't bring anything.


I'm trying to figure out when Frank lost passion or want for the game too, as some have claimed.
Image
Richard4444
RealGM
Posts: 10,414
And1: 7,208
Joined: Dec 28, 2018
Location: São Paulo, Brasil
   

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2150 » by Richard4444 » Wed Mar 13, 2019 3:47 am

It looks like that we have to keep Cap Holds to complete a 12 players roster before the beginning of Free Agency. If we dont have Players Cap Holds, we need to keep Minimun salary charges as Cap Holds.

So, we have to be charged with a adicional 2 MSCs before hit free agency to try signing 2 Max FAs (costs 70,8M).

Expenses that need to be deducted at the 109M Cap Space.
Noah,Lance: 7,5M
Frank,Knox,Dennis,Mitch: 15,5M
Dotson Team Option, 1,5
95,3M and 5 playes in the book
Cap Space Left: 13,7M for the rookie and more 6 players to complete the roster (or MRC).
Trier: 3,5M
MRC 5 players: 4,5M
Total 8M
Left for rookie Cap Hold: 5,7M (not enough for signing the 5 th pick).

So Its impossible to pick Trier Option if we dont shred any Cap Space.
BAF Brooklyn - Pre-Season NBA 2K Simulation 2023 Champions.

Brunson/Nembhard/Micic
IQ/Strus/Ben Sheppard
Butler/Nesmith/Watford
Batum/Boucher/Morris/
Embiid/Plumlee/Landale/
Richard4444
RealGM
Posts: 10,414
And1: 7,208
Joined: Dec 28, 2018
Location: São Paulo, Brasil
   

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2151 » by Richard4444 » Wed Mar 13, 2019 5:13 am

1) Congratulation for your table.

2) I was using the same math as yours. After picking Dotson option, I have the number 13,834M as cap space avaliable to sign the rookie and more 4 others players to the roster. I used to this math of deducted 900K each of the contract of the last players that I bring.

3) But another user is saying that we need to fulfill the 12 roster spots with contracts, Cap Holds or Salary Charges BEFORE the starting of Free Agency period. It makes sense to avoid you offer players more money than the team is alowded to. By have to add these extra Minimum 900K Cap Holds, we will be forced to renounce anothers players Cap Hold to make avaliable the 70,85M to sign 2 MAXs.

In that case you cant count Durant and Irving as a rosters spots and have add extra 2 Holds before free agency.

If he is right, I think we cant pick Triers option. Because BEFORE free agency, you would have 5 players (Mitch,Dot,Frank,Dennis and Knox), 2 Cap Holds (Rookie and Trier) and a need to add 5 Minimum Holds.

Space avaliable (after picking Dotson, before FA period): 13,834M
Expenses
Rookie: 6,4M
Trier: 3.5M
Update 4 Holds: 3,6M
Total Needed to add Trier 13,5M
BAF Brooklyn - Pre-Season NBA 2K Simulation 2023 Champions.

Brunson/Nembhard/Micic
IQ/Strus/Ben Sheppard
Butler/Nesmith/Watford
Batum/Boucher/Morris/
Embiid/Plumlee/Landale/
User avatar
PornDoc
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,613
And1: 465
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Location: Fck the Nets
     

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2152 » by PornDoc » Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:18 am

He sucks.
User avatar
CharlesOakley
Veteran
Posts: 2,915
And1: 2,865
Joined: Jun 27, 2006

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2153 » by CharlesOakley » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:15 pm

Am I the only one who thinks the team has shut Frank down?
User avatar
ITGM
RealGM
Posts: 19,974
And1: 9,349
Joined: Jan 16, 2008

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2154 » by ITGM » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:26 pm

CharlesOakley wrote:Am I the only one who thinks the team has shut Frank down?


Sober-minded people can see this.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,985
And1: 45,735
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2155 » by GONYK » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:32 pm

CharlesOakley wrote:Am I the only one who thinks the team has shut Frank down?

For what purpose?
User avatar
SmoothLefty21
Starter
Posts: 2,177
And1: 2,414
Joined: Jun 15, 2011

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2156 » by SmoothLefty21 » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:40 pm

I can't believe he's going to miss two months with a groin strain. Terrible timing for such a nagging injury.
NYKAL
General Manager
Posts: 8,628
And1: 2,157
Joined: Nov 10, 2004
Location: LAND O NOD

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2157 » by NYKAL » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:48 pm

CharlesOakley wrote:Am I the only one who thinks the team has shut Frank down?


it better be this because if he's still out from jerking off too much, I'm done :)
User avatar
Isiahthomass
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,381
And1: 878
Joined: Aug 08, 2010
     

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2158 » by Isiahthomass » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:57 pm

Frank as he is now would have been decent in the NBA 15-20 years ago. All he would need is a 3 point shot and he could be a poor man's Bruce Bowen. Nowadays though with how athletic and fast the league is and with so many two way players and offensive minded point guards, being great at just defense and very mediocre at offense won't cut it. If he was more athletic I think he'd get more time to develop. I just can't see him sticking around in the NBA for much longer. Maybe some time in the G league or back in europe would be good for him, allow him to develop his offensive skills and build his confidence.
Spree2Houston
Head Coach
Posts: 7,418
And1: 8,834
Joined: Feb 21, 2015
     

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2159 » by Spree2Houston » Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:17 pm

Frank is gone. They're all gone.
taj2133
General Manager
Posts: 7,504
And1: 2,972
Joined: Jun 14, 2009

Re: Knicks plan on exploring trade scenes for Frank Ntilikina 

Post#2160 » by taj2133 » Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:20 pm

Frank Ntilikina (groin) will not play on Monday vs. the Raptors.
He doesn't have a timetable but did resume on-court work recently. He has zero stash appeal because he'll likely be the third-string PG upon his return with a few minutes off the ball.
https://www.rotoworld.com/sports/nba/basketball

Return to New York Knicks