ImageImageImage

Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

suns12345
Starter
Posts: 2,384
And1: 1,612
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
 

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#181 » by suns12345 » Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:01 am

lilfishi22 wrote:
suns12345 wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:Can't compare the last few seasons and say, hey we whiffed on some potential star players, let's go the complete opposite and just take a good role player.


Equally getting good role players outside the top 5 is arguably a good result. Not every player you draft will be a superstar and not every player on a team can be a star.

Good role player doesn't mean bench player either. JJ Reddick for example is a role player but has been a started on many successful teams. Draymond Green is arguably a role player. Both of whom you'd happily draft at picks 5-10

No one is arguing that getting a good role player is always bad result. It's just relative to where they are picked and expectations. I've seen BW consider Clarke as high as #2 when there's guys like Morant and and RJ out there with real star potential. I'm just not sure I can have a role player potential player like Clarke as BPA in the top 3 if Morant and RJ are available. But that's really just my subjective projection of Clarke right now


I probably agree with you there about not taking him at 2. I'm always a supporter of trading back and maybe getting an extra piece if there is a guy you like later on (e.g. what Philly did with us this year). It can be tough to pull off though because if we trade back to 7 and Clarke goes at 6 for example, its a disaster.
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 16,428
And1: 9,090
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#182 » by Ghost of Kleine » Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:04 am

bwgood77 wrote:
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:
Crives wrote:
I see, if that’s the case, do you know how he compares to Kleber? Better defense?


Similar profile. Both athletic, defensive 4s. Clarke is 5 years younger and, importantly, attainable.


I'd be surprised if Clarke isn't the better defender. And I really like Kleber. Kleber can hit 3s on occasion - 33%, but he's 27 and didn't make it to the NBA until 26 where he shot 31%.

I think Kleber will probably be retained, though maybe not if they end up with Zion or Clarke.

Clarke will very likely be cheaper too.


Exactly, that's why I am all for still picking Morant at #2 or 3, if he's there and we are too. THEN.....trading Jackson and the Milwaukee pick for a later pick in his range of the first round.

Walking out of the draft with Both Morant and Clarke smells like a big win for us, would ultimately be cheaper than what we might find in free agency anyways.


And at least in the draft, we wouldn't be bidding against other teams for a desired positional player.

Then in free agency, using the additional cap space from moving Jackson to pick up Collison, Joseph, or even Beverly to mentor Morant for a season or two, until he's ready to take over.

Lastly, in the 2nd round, We can pick up Eric Paschall (unguaranteed contract) and release Holmes IF he's not cheap!!!

With our Exception, we can pick up another sharpshooter.
Image
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,336
And1: 61,074
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#183 » by bwgood77 » Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:18 am

Ghost of Kleine wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:
Similar profile. Both athletic, defensive 4s. Clarke is 5 years younger and, importantly, attainable.


I'd be surprised if Clarke isn't the better defender. And I really like Kleber. Kleber can hit 3s on occasion - 33%, but he's 27 and didn't make it to the NBA until 26 where he shot 31%.

I think Kleber will probably be retained, though maybe not if they end up with Zion or Clarke.

Clarke will very likely be cheaper too.


Exactly, that's why I am all for still picking Morant at #2 or 3, if he's there and we are too. THEN.....trading Jackson and the Milwaukee pick for a later pick in his range of the first round.

Walking out of the draft with Both Morant and Clarke smells like a big win for us, would ultimately be cheaper than what we might find in free agency anyways.


And at least in the draft, we wouldn't be bidding against other teams for a desired positional player.

Then in free agency, using the additional cap space from moving Jackson to pick up Collison, Joseph, or even Beverly to mentor Morant for a season or two, until he's ready to take over.

Lastly, in the 2nd round, We can pick up Eric Paschall (unguaranteed contract) and release Holmes IF he's not cheap!!!

With our Exception, we can pick up another sharpshooter.


I seriously doubt Clarke will last as long as you expect, though I know you expect or want us to trade for multiple picks and draft a couple high first rounders every year as well as some guys in the 2nd.

I think it's unlikely we pick more than one player in the 1st and one in the 2nd, if we even keep the pick. I think we will because rookie contracts are so valuable. I really hope we are looking at Clarke if we land 4 or 5 through 7. I might consider Garland at 4.

I still have to study the draft more.

I know people don't want a role player with a high pick but I love a player like Bridges and to get another similar but likely a better defender because he can rim protect and guard multiple positions, as well as bigs inside is big.

I'm still ok with Tyler Johnson, Melton and Okobo next year, but would try to use what cap space we have for a PG if we get Clarke. If we draft 5-7 we likely will have $10 million even if we keep Oubre which I expect us to.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#184 » by BobbieL » Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:04 am

Ghost of Kleine wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:
Similar profile. Both athletic, defensive 4s. Clarke is 5 years younger and, importantly, attainable.


I'd be surprised if Clarke isn't the better defender. And I really like Kleber. Kleber can hit 3s on occasion - 33%, but he's 27 and didn't make it to the NBA until 26 where he shot 31%.

I think Kleber will probably be retained, though maybe not if they end up with Zion or Clarke.

Clarke will very likely be cheaper too.


Exactly, that's why I am all for still picking Morant at #2 or 3, if he's there and we are too. THEN.....trading Jackson and the Milwaukee pick for a later pick in his range of the first round.

Walking out of the draft with Both Morant and Clarke smells like a big win for us, would ultimately be cheaper than what we might find in free agency anyways.


And at least in the draft, we wouldn't be bidding against other teams for a desired positional player.

Then in free agency, using the additional cap space from moving Jackson to pick up Collison, Joseph, or even Beverly to mentor Morant for a season or two, until he's ready to take over.

Lastly, in the 2nd round, We can pick up Eric Paschall (unguaranteed contract) and release Holmes IF he's not cheap!!!

With our Exception, we can pick up another sharpshooter.


Just not sure the Suns can handle one rookie let alone two or three. I prefer to trade either the first or second round pick
User avatar
Ghost of Kleine
Master of Tweets
Posts: 16,428
And1: 9,090
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#185 » by Ghost of Kleine » Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:14 am

bwgood77 wrote:
Ghost of Kleine wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
I'd be surprised if Clarke isn't the better defender. And I really like Kleber. Kleber can hit 3s on occasion - 33%, but he's 27 and didn't make it to the NBA until 26 where he shot 31%.

I think Kleber will probably be retained, though maybe not if they end up with Zion or Clarke.

Clarke will very likely be cheaper too.


Exactly, that's why I am all for still picking Morant at #2 or 3, if he's there and we are too. THEN.....trading Jackson and the Milwaukee pick for a later pick in his range of the first round.

Walking out of the draft with Both Morant and Clarke smells like a big win for us, would ultimately be cheaper than what we might find in free agency anyways.


And at least in the draft, we wouldn't be bidding against other teams for a desired positional player.

Then in free agency, using the additional cap space from moving Jackson to pick up Collison, Joseph, or even Beverly to mentor Morant for a season or two, until he's ready to take over.

Lastly, in the 2nd round, We can pick up Eric Paschall (unguaranteed contract) and release Holmes IF he's not cheap!!!

With our Exception, we can pick up another sharpshooter.


I seriously doubt Clarke will last as long as you expect, though I know you expect or want us to trade for multiple picks and draft a couple high first rounders every year as well as some guys in the 2nd.

I think it's unlikely we pick more than one player in the 1st and one in the 2nd, if we even keep the pick. I think we will because rookie contracts are so valuable. I really hope we are looking at Clarke if we land 4 or 5 through 7. I might consider Garland at 4.

I still have to study the draft more.

I know people don't want a role player with a high pick but I love a player like Bridges and to get another similar but likely a better defender because he can rim protect and guard multiple positions, as well as bigs inside is big.

I'm still ok with Tyler Johnson, Melton and Okobo next year, but would try to use what cap space we have for a PG if we get Clarke. If we draft 5-7 we likely will have $10 million even if we keep Oubre which I expect us to.



I just think that given our poor league image and not being a destination for most free agents. Also considering that we currently (post Tyler Johnson trade) have much money to work with either, it's reasonable as one of our few options left ,

That we spend one more draft to develop assets( players)organically (similar to the Denver nuggets)and as you said .......rookie contracts are valuable, as they're low cost and easily tradable. But also bring great value in trades these days.

Also, IF we land outside the top 3 of the draft, And Zion, Morant, And Barrett are gone.......


Then I'm all for using our lottery pick on Clarke in that scenario. and then just picking up Tre Jones in the 2nd round for point guard depth.

Additionally, as you mentioned, Clarke is already 22 yrs old and plays a mature game. So I'm not so worried about the rookie adjustment and development issues with him.

Also Eric Paschall is also 22 yrs old, plays a mature game, has played on a well coached championship team under Jay Wright, is 6'9 255 lbs. He's currently leading his team in the tournament again this year too.

And he has played alongside Bridges on their way to the championship. So he has a championship pedigree. And would be familiar with Bridges, and fit seamlessly with him again.

Also, He is a big time clutch player and has a great attitude. A natural leader on the court.

He's also shooting 53% on his 2 point shots/ 36% on his threes/ and 76% on his free throws.

You guys should check him out for sure. He'd be great for added front court depth, with our 2nd round pick.

Point being, Clarke and Paschall are both tenured, expeirenced college players with mature games, and in the instance of Paschall, it would be a very low risk high reward asset for the suns to get in the 2nd round.

Finally, the reason that I'm for this, is because we have basically hamstringed ourself in free agency, are not a free agent destination, and have a very poor league image currently as well.

I just want to make sure that we add some positive additions to our roster (that are experienced and having a winning attitude) as insurance in case we strike out in free agency.

And i know that we need veteran leadership to add to our team, but I just don't see who we're going to realistically be able to add in free agency with the small amount of cap space that we have left.

And i haven't yet seen anything of good measure from our front office, to instill me with any confidence in their cryptic plans.
Image
carey
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,192
And1: 1,941
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
     

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#186 » by carey » Thu Mar 14, 2019 1:53 pm

BobbieL wrote:
Just not sure the Suns can handle one rookie let alone two or three. I prefer to trade either the first or second round pick

My thoughts as well. Although I am not sure I'm trading out of the top 3.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#187 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:12 pm

carey wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
Just not sure the Suns can handle one rookie let alone two or three. I prefer to trade either the first or second round pick

My thoughts as well. Although I am not sure I'm trading out of the top 3.
To me the most interesting scenario is if they are sitting at 3 and Ja goes 2 and there's no good trade to be found. Barrett seems like the concensus best player left at that point and they would probably just take him. That would cause them to make some hard decisions on the wing or maybe you basically try him as a PG at first. Also sitting 4-6 and not finding a trade but maybe then it's as simple as drafting Garland if he looks good in workouts.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Frank Lee
RealGM
Posts: 14,268
And1: 10,086
Joined: Nov 07, 2006

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#188 » by Frank Lee » Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:26 pm

No reason why we cannot absorb two more rooks... in fact, I contend we are in a great position to do so.

We draft Morant or Garland or my sneaky eyeballer, Alexander-Walker...(all this speculation is multiplied without knowing the draft order) so lets say we draft a PG, then package Jackson/second rounder to move up for a PF.

Free agency rolls in and we sign a starting vet PF like Gibson (very similar to Clarke, former undersized C in college) or Aminu.
Both rooks can play behind vets, assuming we keep TJohnson. Its a realistic progression, ideal for development. And its an easy fix.

BTW
All this localized Clarke hype overlooks his team mate Huchimura. Superb athlete ... 230-240 lbs, 7'2" span. Can run the floor, go coast to coast. Has developed a jump shot... plays that kind of scrappy D we are evolving to. There will be prospects who surface over the next couple of weeks. And we are gearing down (or up?) for our yearly highlite.... the pick selection.
What ? Me Worry ?
Wilber85
Veteran
Posts: 2,721
And1: 2,421
Joined: Oct 10, 2017

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#189 » by Wilber85 » Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:47 pm

lilfishi22 wrote:
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:What does this team need? Rebounding, 3PT shooting and a defensive big. Oh it would be great if that player was also a low usage player that is a complement to Ayton. Who is available that could tick those boxes?

Aaaaaaand go


Bjelica, Ilyasova, Bertans :cry:

.... aaaaaand Bender, of course.

And of course, they are bench players, and do not deserve a starting role, let alone a big contract. They don't move the needle to compete. They just add bench depth or give us two bench players as starters.


LOL. You are funny. Enjoy the mediocre then! Kleber, Ilyasova, etc. !!! They won't do anything for us.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#190 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:54 pm

Wilber85 wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:
ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:
Bjelica, Ilyasova, Bertans :cry:

.... aaaaaand Bender, of course.

And of course, they are bench players, and do not deserve a starting role, let alone a big contract. They don't move the needle to compete. They just add bench depth or give us two bench players as starters.


LOL. You are funny. Enjoy the mediocre then! Kleber, Ilyasova, etc. !!! They won't do anything for us.
What's a realistic alternative?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#191 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:58 pm

Frank Lee wrote:No reason why we cannot absorb two more rooks... in fact, I contend we are in a great position to do so.

We draft Morant or Garland or my sneaky eyeballer, Alexander-Walker...(all this speculation is multiplied without knowing the draft order) so lets say we draft a PG, then package Jackson/second rounder to move up for a PF.

Free agency rolls in and we sign a starting vet PF like Gibson (very similar to Clarke, former undersized C in college) or Aminu.
Both rooks can play behind vets, assuming we keep TJohnson. Its a realistic progression, ideal for development. And its an easy fix.

BTW
All this localized Clarke hype overlooks his team mate Huchimura. Superb athlete ... 230-240 lbs, 7'2" span. Can run the floor, go coast to coast. Has developed a jump shot... plays that kind of scrappy D we are evolving to. There will be prospects who surface over the next couple of weeks. And we are gearing down (or up?) for our yearly highlite.... the pick selection.
Hachimura is interesting. You can tell it's a weird draft by how all over the place projections are with these players. Guys vary like 10+ spots depending on the site you look at.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Crives
General Manager
Posts: 9,127
And1: 7,464
Joined: Feb 21, 2014
 

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#192 » by Crives » Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:06 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Frank Lee wrote:No reason why we cannot absorb two more rooks... in fact, I contend we are in a great position to do so.

We draft Morant or Garland or my sneaky eyeballer, Alexander-Walker...(all this speculation is multiplied without knowing the draft order) so lets say we draft a PG, then package Jackson/second rounder to move up for a PF.

Free agency rolls in and we sign a starting vet PF like Gibson (very similar to Clarke, former undersized C in college) or Aminu.
Both rooks can play behind vets, assuming we keep TJohnson. Its a realistic progression, ideal for development. And its an easy fix.

BTW
All this localized Clarke hype overlooks his team mate Huchimura. Superb athlete ... 230-240 lbs, 7'2" span. Can run the floor, go coast to coast. Has developed a jump shot... plays that kind of scrappy D we are evolving to. There will be prospects who surface over the next couple of weeks. And we are gearing down (or up?) for our yearly highlite.... the pick selection.
Hachimura is interesting. You can tell it's a weird draft by how all over the place projections are with these players. Guys vary like 10+ spots depending on the site you look at.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app


Yeah, one of the boards doesn’t even have Clarke going in the 1st
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,472
And1: 17,093
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#193 » by Saberestar » Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:12 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Wilber85 wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:And of course, they are bench players, and do not deserve a starting role, let alone a big contract. They don't move the needle to compete. They just add bench depth or give us two bench players as starters.


LOL. You are funny. Enjoy the mediocre then! Kleber, Ilyasova, etc. !!! They won't do anything for us.
What's a realistic alternative?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app

I talked about him a few days ago... Danillo Gallinari.

Perfect fit next to Ayton on offense. Super smart and great shooter. Not a worse defender than any other guys not named Kleber.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#194 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:15 pm

Saberestar wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Wilber85 wrote:
LOL. You are funny. Enjoy the mediocre then! Kleber, Ilyasova, etc. !!! They won't do anything for us.
What's a realistic alternative?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app

I talked about him a few days ago... Danillo Gallinari.

Perfect fit next to Ayton. Super smart and great shooter. Not a worse defender than any other guys not named Kleber.
Id absolutely take a swing on Galo. Why would the clips move him this summer though? He's been great this year. All signs point to them getting Leonard this summer so id imagine they would want those two together and try to compete.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Wilber85
Veteran
Posts: 2,721
And1: 2,421
Joined: Oct 10, 2017

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#195 » by Wilber85 » Thu Mar 14, 2019 4:27 pm

Saberestar wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Wilber85 wrote:
LOL. You are funny. Enjoy the mediocre then! Kleber, Ilyasova, etc. !!! They won't do anything for us.
What's a realistic alternative?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app

I talked about him a few days ago... Danillo Gallinari.

Perfect fit next to Ayton on offense. Super smart and great shooter. Not a worse defender than any other guys not named Kleber.


Gallinari, Mirotic, Trade for Love , Griffin, or Gordon
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#196 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Mar 14, 2019 4:44 pm

Wilber85 wrote:
Saberestar wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:What's a realistic alternative?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app

I talked about him a few days ago... Danillo Gallinari.

Perfect fit next to Ayton on offense. Super smart and great shooter. Not a worse defender than any other guys not named Kleber.


Gallinari, Mirotic, Trade for Love , Griffin, or Gordon
Sure I'd be open to any of them. Love would scare me a little but at the right price sure. I kind of doubt either Blake or Galo will be available. Gordon could be and I do think the suns should/would be in the mix.

Mirotic is the only one on that list who is a FA. They would need to clear some space to have a shot at him.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Cutter
Head Coach
Posts: 6,776
And1: 2,012
Joined: Nov 25, 2010
   

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#197 » by Cutter » Thu Mar 14, 2019 5:03 pm

Taj Gidson
Danillo Galinari
Nikola Mirotic

All are perfect fits next to Ayton, fill a major positional need, and are reasonably attainable. I think we will go into next season with the PF position in solid veteran hands.
Blonde
Veteran
Posts: 2,939
And1: 3,924
Joined: Jun 16, 2014
Location: Phoenix
       

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#198 » by Blonde » Thu Mar 14, 2019 5:14 pm

Cutter wrote:Taj Gidson
Danillo Galinari
Nikola Mirotic

All are perfect fits next to Ayton, fill a major positional need, and are reasonably attainable. I think we will go into next season with the PF position in solid veteran hands.

Add Thad Young to that group - best defender among them. I wouldn't consider Taj unless it was very cheap and we already got a PG.
Wilber85
Veteran
Posts: 2,721
And1: 2,421
Joined: Oct 10, 2017

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#199 » by Wilber85 » Thu Mar 14, 2019 5:23 pm

now looking at this.

Trade for Gordon (Young, U of A guy) Defense, and extended his game to 3 pt land, and can also pass. He is the perfect fit.

Let's trade for him.

Would something like Warren, Bender (Or no), Milwaukee Pick work?

or maybe Tyler Johnson, Jackson for Gordon , Filler
dremill24
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,935
And1: 3,220
Joined: Jan 11, 2016
Contact:

Re: Season speculation, free agency, and trade ideas: #ValleyBoyz rise up 

Post#200 » by dremill24 » Thu Mar 14, 2019 5:50 pm

Wilber85 wrote:now looking at this.

Trade for Gordon (Young, U of A guy) Defense, and extended his game to 3 pt land, and can also pass. He is the perfect fit.

Let's trade for him.

Would something like Warren, Bender (Or no), Milwaukee Pick work?

or maybe Tyler Johnson, Jackson for Gordon , Filler


So you’re scoffing at the “mediocrity” of other guys mentioned and your alternative is Aaron Gordon?
Trying out this Substack thing. Suns and NBA thoughts. Check it out: https://hoopsnexus.substack.com/

Return to Phoenix Suns