King Ken wrote:Spud2nique wrote:
You are almost convincing me. I will say he is a very smart player, I’m just worried that if we draft him that he’s a natural fit. Of course you CAN play anybody with Trae but which player will maximize their skills off Trae and vice versa.
For example, if Cam is running off screens and gunning threes in transition off crazy Nash/Stockton/White Chocolate passes by Trae or if we have 2 generals in Trae and RJ controlling an uptempo style but not necessarily bringing out each other’s maximum potentials?
I’m a definite NO on Morant. I can’t see Westbrook in this kid. I see a more aggressive Sexton and I hate that.
I see what you are saying with maximizing Trae's skills. I just think you need to protect him on defense at the 5. The 5 will always be the most important player for Trae or the 4. The reason why is because that player needs to be a rim protector, defend in space, able to protect Collins, and still good enough to screen well and play the PnR well. PnP is not needed as much although having a center who can shoot threes would be nice.
Cam is going to need a lot of time. He is very raw. That said, his ceiling is crazy good. Maybe higher than R.J. but you need just as much for him and more than you did for Trae. Cam will need a quality vet in front of him. He will need to learn how to play the position in the NBA. For the PG talk, PG learned from a NBA All Star in Danny Granger. You need that guy so he can be an understudy. I believe you rush Cam and he will be a bust.
I believe Trae and R.J. will be just as effective. Just in different ways. Also, we have to remember, no one in amateur basketball is as good in transition as R.J. is. No one. R.J. is a great fit. He is not the perfect fit like Cam at his max is but Cam at his max will take a lot of work and GMing and it's not just on Hawks University either which R.J. is just plug and play like Hunter. You don't need to add batteries or get extra parts to make it work.
I love Ja. I was higher on him as a prospect than Trae but potentially, I see them the same. Ja isn't the scorer or shooter Trae is but Ja half court ability is tremendous with the PnR.
If Trae is a blend of Lillard/Nash/Zeke for me potentially, Ja is a blend of Westbrook/Fox/Schroeder with a better floor game and court vision than these three as a prospect but lacking the ball hawk abilities or defensive intensity of those guys as prospects. I like him passing vision a lot. If you don't like Westbrook, Dennis, or Fox, there is a chance you might not like Morant. His decision making skills is questionable. His shooting form is like Dennis. His defensive effort is Dennis like. But his court vision is elite. His PnR skills is elite. His skill level is higher then those three as prospects. His ability to dominate the stat sheet will remind you of Westbrook and he is an elite athlete. I love him as a prospect. He is translatable for me. More than Trae was. I felt Trae needed to go to the right situation which will build around him, give him a vet to start over him or cut his mins and let him learn the NBA game. I felt we did all of that and we are now seeing the fruits of our labor. For Morant, I feel he can come in next year and give a team a major boost offensively. He is smart and knows how to run an offense. I think his potential is sky high like Trae's.