WWE Raw Discussion III
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- LLJ
- RealGM
- Posts: 54,259
- And1: 18,572
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: Unfixed
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
They'll be regularly below 2M in a month.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
Spens1
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,865
- And1: 3,879
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
It was a horrible show, that's the least they deserved after putting that product on TV (the in ring stuff was bad as was the segments).
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,933
- And1: 3,011
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Bray is creepy, man. The subtle details in the segments adds another layer too. The "person" shown in the window of the burning house, Abby the witch becoming violent (voice wise), Bray's expressions, especially during the, "Let me in" line. Gold.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- bestnamezRtaken
- Senior
- Posts: 714
- And1: 349
- Joined: Feb 25, 2011
- Location: Ayer, MA
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
tugs wrote:Bray is creepy, man. The subtle details in the segments adds another layer too. The "person" shown in the window of the burning house, Abby the witch becoming violent (voice wise), Bray's expressions, especially during the, "Let me in" line. Gold.
Yeah, they're nailing the small little subtle details in these segments. I've watched it a few times and I notice something new every time.
Also, my three kids (all 2 1/2yo) LOVE the Firefly Funhouse. They get sucked into it, stop what they're doing and laser focused. When Bray was spelling Sociopath...one of them was trying to spell along with Bray. Then when he was waving goodbye, my kids waved goodbye to him as well.
Creepy.
Kobe Bryant was asked who he feels is the toughest opponent to guard in the NBA. Instead of picking OKC's Kevin Durant, Bryant went with Portland’s Brandon Roy.
"Roy 365 days, seven days a week. Roy has no weaknesses in his game."
"Roy 365 days, seven days a week. Roy has no weaknesses in his game."
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,933
- And1: 3,011
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
That's messed up man watch over them.
Just saw the inspiration of this segment. Got hooked to Don't Hug Me I'm Scared.
Just saw the inspiration of this segment. Got hooked to Don't Hug Me I'm Scared.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- LLJ
- RealGM
- Posts: 54,259
- And1: 18,572
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: Unfixed
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Not sure it belongs in this thread, but since nobody knows where he's going yet, here's something some indie fans may have missed:
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- bestnamezRtaken
- Senior
- Posts: 714
- And1: 349
- Joined: Feb 25, 2011
- Location: Ayer, MA
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
LLJ wrote:Not sure it belongs in this thread, but since nobody knows where he's going yet, here's something some indie fans may have missed:
viewtopic.php?p=74711016#p74711016
Kobe Bryant was asked who he feels is the toughest opponent to guard in the NBA. Instead of picking OKC's Kevin Durant, Bryant went with Portland’s Brandon Roy.
"Roy 365 days, seven days a week. Roy has no weaknesses in his game."
"Roy 365 days, seven days a week. Roy has no weaknesses in his game."
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
JohnPferdelack
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,272
- And1: 1,516
- Joined: Mar 15, 2017
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
improper
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,521
- And1: 4,405
- Joined: May 23, 2014
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
They don't seem to understand that the problem with Raw is not a lack of star power. It's a lack of quality content.
You can't expect people to watch a three hour show where only about fifteen minutes of it doesn't suck.
You can't expect people to watch a three hour show where only about fifteen minutes of it doesn't suck.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
JohnPferdelack
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,272
- And1: 1,516
- Joined: Mar 15, 2017
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
They have no real plans, no storylines. Everytime a wrestlers switches the brands without a reason.
Even the rating confirms that but there's no improvement in sight.
Even the rating confirms that but there's no improvement in sight.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
Scott Hall
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,518
- And1: 62,706
- Joined: May 04, 2015
- Location: T-Dot
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
improper wrote:They don't seem to understand that the problem with Raw is not a lack of star power. It's a lack of quality content.
You can't expect people to watch a three hour show where only about fifteen minutes of it doesn't suck.
Nailed it
The stubborn delusional emperor knows better then everybody no end in sight
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- Heat3
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,401
- And1: 16,179
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: Where all the children are above average.
- Contact:
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Scott Hall wrote:improper wrote:They don't seem to understand that the problem with Raw is not a lack of star power. It's a lack of quality content.
You can't expect people to watch a three hour show where only about fifteen minutes of it doesn't suck.
Nailed it
The stubborn delusional emperor knows better then everybody no end in sight
To be fair, it’s easier to point out that something sucks than it is to make it not suck.
Pat Riley wrote:There are only two options regarding commitment. You're either IN or you're OUT. There is no such thing as life in-between.
James Johnson wrote:The culture is REAL.

Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
improper
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,521
- And1: 4,405
- Joined: May 23, 2014
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Heat3 wrote:To be fair, it’s easier to point out that something sucks than it is to make it not suck.
Eh...I don't think booking wrestling is rocket science. You just need an understanding of your audience and what they want, and you need to build up the guys the fans respond to.
The problem is that WWE does the exact opposite of both of those 90% of the time, then occasionally throw us a bone by letting Becky and Kofi win. But it's not enough when the midcard is nonexistent and everyone outside of about five people is treated like they don't matter on a weekly basis.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- Stanford
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 53,714
- And1: 18,973
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Companies spend millions of dollars trying to figure out what their customers want. I dont think it's as easy as you're letting on. Especially when it comes to wrestling fans, who turn against something the second they think authority figures are behind it.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
Scott Hall
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,518
- And1: 62,706
- Joined: May 04, 2015
- Location: T-Dot
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Nobody complained during the 80's, 90's and early to mid 2000's
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- Stanford
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 53,714
- And1: 18,973
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Scott Hall wrote:Nobody complained during the 80's, 90's and early to mid 2000's
So no one complained before high speed internet was available in most communities.
Also, it took me about 3 minutes to find this post on a wrestling google group from 2001:
WWF sucks now
McMahon better do something cuz this sucks...HHH/SCSA are getting old and it
sucks you can't have one match anymore without the weapons.
And the replies
Spoiler:
These may as well be tweets from yesterday.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
improper
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,521
- And1: 4,405
- Joined: May 23, 2014
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Stanford wrote:Companies spend millions of dollars trying to figure out what their customers want. I dont think it's as easy as you're letting on. Especially when it comes to wrestling fans, who turn against something the second they think authority figures are behind it.
Most companies don't have a live crowd every damn night telling them what they want that they proceed to ignore for the better part of a decade.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
Scott Hall
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,518
- And1: 62,706
- Joined: May 04, 2015
- Location: T-Dot
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Stanford wrote:Scott Hall wrote:Nobody complained during the 80's, 90's and early to mid 2000's
So no one complained before high speed internet was available in most communities.
Also, it took me about 3 minutes to find this post on a wrestling google group from 2001:
WWF sucks nowMcMahon better do something cuz this sucks...HHH/SCSA are getting old and it
sucks you can't have one match anymore without the weapons.
And the repliesSpoiler:
These may as well be tweets from yesterday.
There's always going to be morons and morons with agendas... Stupidity can be traced all the way back
to Biblical times. I'm sure their are fans of the Golden State Warriors or New England Patriots that whine
and bitch about stuff.
For the most part most people loved the Golden Era, New Generation and Attitude Era. I mean just look
at the ratings from then till now.
I'm sure those morons from back then are pining for those days on their twitter or Instagram.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- bestnamezRtaken
- Senior
- Posts: 714
- And1: 349
- Joined: Feb 25, 2011
- Location: Ayer, MA
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Stanford wrote:Companies spend millions of dollars trying to figure out what their customers want. I dont think it's as easy as you're letting on. Especially when it comes to wrestling fans, who turn against something the second they think authority figures are behind it.
QFT. It's actually crazy that people think booking wrestling is "easy" when in reality, it's not. Sure, it's easy to say what you think should happen but you're only going by what you want, not what's best for business. The internet is a great place to talk a big game when it comes to the wrestling business.
Kobe Bryant was asked who he feels is the toughest opponent to guard in the NBA. Instead of picking OKC's Kevin Durant, Bryant went with Portland’s Brandon Roy.
"Roy 365 days, seven days a week. Roy has no weaknesses in his game."
"Roy 365 days, seven days a week. Roy has no weaknesses in his game."
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
daoneandonly
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,236
- And1: 4,228
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
bestnamezRtaken wrote:Stanford wrote:Companies spend millions of dollars trying to figure out what their customers want. I dont think it's as easy as you're letting on. Especially when it comes to wrestling fans, who turn against something the second they think authority figures are behind it.
QFT. It's actually crazy that people think booking wrestling is "easy" when in reality, it's not. Sure, it's easy to say what you think should happen but you're only going by what you want, not what's best for business. The internet is a great place to talk a big game when it comes to the wrestling business.
This is true, but there is the part where there are certain wrestlers who just bring nothing to the table, yet they take up air time and hence drag down the product quality. I'm talking about the likes of Natalya, Nia Jax, Jinder Mahal, etc.
Then you have instances where guys like Bobby Lashley, EC3, and Matt hardy proved they could be money characters elsewhere, and aren't allowed to showcase those very skills in WWE.
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live




