MoneyTalks41890 wrote:What PG could Crowder and Exum and a 1st bring back?
For sure Jeff Teague
Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:What PG could Crowder and Exum and a 1st bring back?
PharmD wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:What PG could Crowder and Exum and a 1st bring back?
For sure Jeff Teague
loserX wrote:I don't mind it at all, but then I'm more pessimistic than even this
I don't think we're getting a max guy, period. I don't think Brand lets Harris go even if some Philly fans are willing to, and I don't see why Harris leaves if Brand will pay him. But in a world where none of this matters, he's a good get
KqWIN wrote:loserX wrote:I don't mind it at all, but then I'm more pessimistic than even this
I don't think we're getting a max guy, period. I don't think Brand lets Harris go even if some Philly fans are willing to, and I don't see why Harris leaves if Brand will pay him. But in a world where none of this matters, he's a good get
Agreed. This is a very good outcome considering the reality of our FA chances.
I could see a scenario where Harris wants more shots and doesn't think he'll get them in Philly, but he will also have teams lining up for him and I don't like UTA's odds in a FA race.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
jazzfan1971 wrote:Will KOC pull a rabbit out of his nether regions? I dunno. I hope so, but for now this is my best guess.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:PharmD wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:What PG could Crowder and Exum and a 1st bring back?
For sure Jeff Teague
That's a good one. Likely can be done without the first and I think Minny would still go for it.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:PharmD wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:What PG could Crowder and Exum and a 1st bring back?
For sure Jeff Teague
That's a good one. Likely can be done without the first and I think Minny would still go for it.
Domejandro wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:PharmD wrote:For sure Jeff Teague
That's a good one. Likely can be done without the first and I think Minny would still go for it.
The whole Exum contract makes me a bit iffy without the first, and I'm basically the conductor of the "Jeff Teague is probably getting traded" train. With the first, I'd happily do it for the flexibility it would give us, but otherwise, I think I pass.
Jazz had their choice of Teague or Hill already, they chose Hill. Then they chose Rubio over Hill. Hill or Teague to Utah are gone imo.BizGilwalker wrote:I see an absolute zero percent chance a team of Utah's caliber willingly goes into next season with Dante Exum as their starting PG. If they're unable to grab a starting PG, I wonder if there is a chance they're try to force Donovan Mitchell into a PG role and overpay a sharpshooting wing to start alongside him, like Danny Green or someone.
But I really think Utah should be able to get Jeff Teague, George Hill if they're unable to snag a better starter through FA or trade.
CAE15 wrote:Jazz had their choice of Teague or Hill already, they chose Hill. Then they chose Rubio over Hill. Hill or Teague to Utah are gone imo.BizGilwalker wrote:I see an absolute zero percent chance a team of Utah's caliber willingly goes into next season with Dante Exum as their starting PG. If they're unable to grab a starting PG, I wonder if there is a chance they're try to force Donovan Mitchell into a PG role and overpay a sharpshooting wing to start alongside him, like Danny Green or someone.
But I really think Utah should be able to get Jeff Teague, George Hill if they're unable to snag a better starter through FA or trade.
There's plenty of point guards out there for the Jazz. Collison, Beverley, Satoransky, Joseph, Wright among others.
Sent from my SM-N950U using RealGM mobile app
Gobert called out Hill among other players for chasing their own stats. Hill took offence to this and it rocked the boat. Hill missed a defensive assignment against the warriors and Rudy again yelled at him and then Hill proceeded to not play for the rest of the series, essentially quitting on his team. Add in the fact that Jazz offered Hill a very generous contract 4/80(agent convinced him he was worth more, later fired his agent) I just highly doubt Utah would bring him back with how he rubbed the leader of the team, the wrong way.BizGilwalker wrote:CAE15 wrote:Jazz had their choice of Teague or Hill already, they chose Hill. Then they chose Rubio over Hill. Hill or Teague to Utah are gone imo.BizGilwalker wrote:I see an absolute zero percent chance a team of Utah's caliber willingly goes into next season with Dante Exum as their starting PG. If they're unable to grab a starting PG, I wonder if there is a chance they're try to force Donovan Mitchell into a PG role and overpay a sharpshooting wing to start alongside him, like Danny Green or someone.
But I really think Utah should be able to get Jeff Teague, George Hill if they're unable to snag a better starter through FA or trade.
There's plenty of point guards out there for the Jazz. Collison, Beverley, Satoransky, Joseph, Wright among others.
Sent from my SM-N950U using RealGM mobile app
I completely blanked on that entire Teague/Hill situation. Those guys both made sense on paper though. Is the George Hill bridge burned or something? It seemed like he had a great year there and then left to get massively overpaid by Sacramento. But yeah I could see Collison in that bracket as well. I could definitely see Beverley fitting in there, and Collison would be a great pickup too. CoJo and Wright I see as backups, but they could do plenty worse. I was under the impression that Satoransky was pretty much garbage though, and thoroughly outmatched starting at PG.
Domejandro wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:PharmD wrote:For sure Jeff Teague
That's a good one. Likely can be done without the first and I think Minny would still go for it.
The whole Exum contract makes me a bit iffy without the first, and I'm basically the conductor of the "Jeff Teague is probably getting traded" train. With the first, I'd happily do it for the flexibility it would give us, but otherwise, I think I pass.
JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
jazzfan1971 wrote:Fischella wrote:Randle is a Center, stretch PF? what?
He's 6'9 and shot 34% from 3 on 2.7 attempts. The Jazz would certainly use him as a stretch 4 (and some backup 5).
Return to Trades and Transactions