King Malta wrote:It's been said on numerous MN Sports Podcasts, but Miami come across as a team who'd be arrogant enough to believe that they could fix Andrew Wiggins. I'd be speaking to Riley to see his interest in a trade, I feel like we wouldn't need to give up a significant asset to make it happen either.
The Toronto theory also makes some sense IMO, although I agree with Domejandro in that Toronto probably wouldn't take him without getting a decent asset. If Toronto have to blow it up, having a home town boy (and let's be honest, great tank commander) coming in for a couple of years while they rebuild isn't a disaster. Collect a couple of picks, kick the tires on Wiggins and if he doesn't improve you'll only have a couple of seasons left on his deal, making it much more movable at that point.
I wouldn´t trade Wiggins for other bad contracts (Miami) if nothing desirable is received in exchange. I mean, what would the goal and the sense be? I would rather have Wiggins´ bad contract than other random players´bad contracts. I understand the value of chopping the monstrous contract into more managable and tradeable toxic contracts. But as silly as it might sound after years of disappointments, Wiggins still has potencial that has not been unlocked by the preposterous coaches that led his development as a player.














