ImageImage

Potential Offseason Moves

Moderators: SD2042, VCfor3

VCfor3
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,123
Joined: May 11, 2017
 

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#61 » by VCfor3 » Sat May 18, 2019 7:33 pm

Whole Truth wrote:
psman2 wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:
I'm not too sure this team is a lock for bottom 5 without Conley.

What if Morant comes in & balls out the gate?, possible. What if Jaren takes a leap in his game working with Garnett?, possible. I already know some Memphis fans still don't realize what they got in the Gasol trade with both Jonas & Delon as some have suggested not retain him. Your team also has young quality depth, other young players that are still improving.

I'm not as sure as you but I like the new lotto system where there's still a chance. The good news in this is most of the talent is in the top 6 where the pick is protected putting your team in a good position to pick quality or convey where it drops off for a win win situation.


I would be thrilled if Ja and JJJ are so good out of the gate that we win a lot more than expected, that would be a good outcome for me even if we convey the pick. I just don’t see a rookie PG leading a team without a top 50 player to anything but a bottom 5 record. We can strategically rest vets and play with the rotations later in the year some to ensure a bad enough record.

I could see us losing Wright if someone comes strong in FA too if another team wants to gamble he can be their starter, I think it is 50/50 he is back at this point. Under 10 we keep him likely over that I think we let him walk.


Considering Jackson was expected to be the rawest of the big men prospects at 19 this past season, his production should have been somewhat unexpected!. The only thing I see potentially holding Ja back from jumping into the league with his skillset is his slim frame & strength but my overall point was you never know. Educated guessing, is not exact science. What is not a guess, is Jonas play was not an anomaly for Memphis. It's his game extended in mins allowed & he's still improving defensively so there's room for him to improve as well.

Some facts about Jonas advanced defensive #'s that Memphis fans might not know.

Jonas has played 11,844 mins against starters & 457 against reserves over 7 seasons, where DeRozan, Lowry & most players get a benefit of playing against weaker apposing benches for stretches. Most of those 457 mins came this past season which elevated his numbers. Under the guise of demotion.

He didn't finish games either in favor of defensive alternatives/specialist under a defensive coach who didn't value his offense. If he started games off poorly he was not afforded opportunity to finish, if DeRozan was struggling as a high usage scorer, poor defender & Jonas was playing well individually, all of his minutes were ties to playing with DeRozan, there was no separation for Jonas to play with a defensive perimeter upgrade. Players can have hot & cold stretches, Jonas never afforded the opportunity to play out of a cold stretch as Raptors were contenders out the gate. Part reason was systematic, to minimize these two players defensive flaws & Jonas has some, Casey had Jonas sitting back in the post to give up the mid range jumper. This was in part to protect DeRozan giving up blow by's, guarding in space, failing to close out & to have Jonas in good rebounding position. Jonas allowing that mid range jumper, was by design.

Both Noah & Gasol were former DPOY's, here there defensive ratings with Memphis compared with Jonas.

Gasol 106 Drtg
Noah 105 Drtg
Jonas 105 Drtg

How is it with a depleted Memphis roster they remained top 5 in defense with Jonas starting?. How is it, Raptors manage to be top 5 in defense in the East with Jonas starting?. Offense & Rebounding, are a part of playing defense, Jonas efficiency, rebounding offsets a lot of his defensive short comings. Problem is under Casey they never took advantage of his efficiency. He was there to cleanup the high usage lower efficiency of DeRozan & Lowry, set picks as a garbage man big, which eliminated a good portion of his strength as a player.

In short, if resigned, Jonas will be good for Memphis. If Jaren, Ja excel with some solid contribution from Memphis quality depth I think they will string together wins. I know it was the East but Jonas, DeRozan & Lowry with holes at SF/PF were a 50 win core for 6 seasons. Jaren, is better than anything Raptors had at PF up till Pascals emergence this year. They had a revolving door at SF till Kawhi this year. Bradley may not be as good a scorer as Derozan but under high usage he could replicate what DeRozan brought to the table while being considerably better defensively. Lowry has declined statistically over the years but he impacts the game mainly with his intangibles. His pnr with Jonas was the Raptors most effective, efficient offense. Ja comes in with his athleticism & passing coming off Jonas screening ability if he has any consistency from range out the gate best believe I think this team will be better than expected. Put versatile defenders who can seamlessly switch, shoot the 3 ball around a Jonas/JA pnr screening action & yeah, I can envision unexpected success.



Noah is a former DPOY, Gasol is a former DPOY, Jonas is labelled a poor defender. Here's their Drtg with Memphis

Gasol 106 Drtg
Noah 105 Drtg
Jonas 105 Drtg

To lend to my point Raptors drafted a defensive pnr big man in Poeltl who posted impressive defensive numbers with last years Raptors bench unit.

He had a 125 Drtg playing with the starting unit Jonas was ties to. Look at Gasol against the Bucks, they're not unlike the Cavs roster. He like Jonas can be stretched out but he's slower footed


JV's defensive problem is that he can't guard the PnR. That was why he got killed in the playoffs. In the regular season (especially towards the end when games aren't quite as important for some teams), his defense is fine. He defends the paint and sometimes gets put in the PnR and we pay for it. But he then helps make up for it on the offensive end. We'll have to see but there is a chance he opts out or we move him for an additional asset. I think a decent team to compare next year's team to is this year's Atlanta team. Trae's vision was great for them like we hope Ja's will be for us. They had a couple decent vets in Bazemore and Dedmon. Collins was great on offense and contributed to winning on a similar level to what JJJ hopefully will (though I expect JJJ to be a bit better due to his defense). Prince and Heurter are good young players. It will depend on what we get back for Conley, but I think our team likely finishes about like the Hawks did which was 5th worst record. I say we end up around 5-7 and are in a similar position to convey as we were this year.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#62 » by Whole Truth » Sat May 18, 2019 8:33 pm

VCfor3 wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:
psman2 wrote:
I would be thrilled if Ja and JJJ are so good out of the gate that we win a lot more than expected, that would be a good outcome for me even if we convey the pick. I just don’t see a rookie PG leading a team without a top 50 player to anything but a bottom 5 record. We can strategically rest vets and play with the rotations later in the year some to ensure a bad enough record.

I could see us losing Wright if someone comes strong in FA too if another team wants to gamble he can be their starter, I think it is 50/50 he is back at this point. Under 10 we keep him likely over that I think we let him walk.


Considering Jackson was expected to be the rawest of the big men prospects at 19 this past season, his production should have been somewhat unexpected!. The only thing I see potentially holding Ja back from jumping into the league with his skillset is his slim frame & strength but my overall point was you never know. Educated guessing, is not exact science. What is not a guess, is Jonas play was not an anomaly for Memphis. It's his game extended in mins allowed & he's still improving defensively so there's room for him to improve as well.

Some facts about Jonas advanced defensive #'s that Memphis fans might not know.

Jonas has played 11,844 mins against starters & 457 against reserves over 7 seasons, where DeRozan, Lowry & most players get a benefit of playing against weaker apposing benches for stretches. Most of those 457 mins came this past season which elevated his numbers. Under the guise of demotion.

He didn't finish games either in favor of defensive alternatives/specialist under a defensive coach who didn't value his offense. If he started games off poorly he was not afforded opportunity to finish, if DeRozan was struggling as a high usage scorer, poor defender & Jonas was playing well individually, all of his minutes were ties to playing with DeRozan, there was no separation for Jonas to play with a defensive perimeter upgrade. Players can have hot & cold stretches, Jonas never afforded the opportunity to play out of a cold stretch as Raptors were contenders out the gate. Part reason was systematic, to minimize these two players defensive flaws & Jonas has some, Casey had Jonas sitting back in the post to give up the mid range jumper. This was in part to protect DeRozan giving up blow by's, guarding in space, failing to close out & to have Jonas in good rebounding position. Jonas allowing that mid range jumper, was by design.

Both Noah & Gasol were former DPOY's, here there defensive ratings with Memphis compared with Jonas.

Gasol 106 Drtg
Noah 105 Drtg
Jonas 105 Drtg

How is it with a depleted Memphis roster they remained top 5 in defense with Jonas starting?. How is it, Raptors manage to be top 5 in defense in the East with Jonas starting?. Offense & Rebounding, are a part of playing defense, Jonas efficiency, rebounding offsets a lot of his defensive short comings. Problem is under Casey they never took advantage of his efficiency. He was there to cleanup the high usage lower efficiency of DeRozan & Lowry, set picks as a garbage man big, which eliminated a good portion of his strength as a player.

In short, if resigned, Jonas will be good for Memphis. If Jaren, Ja excel with some solid contribution from Memphis quality depth I think they will string together wins. I know it was the East but Jonas, DeRozan & Lowry with holes at SF/PF were a 50 win core for 6 seasons. Jaren, is better than anything Raptors had at PF up till Pascals emergence this year. They had a revolving door at SF till Kawhi this year. Bradley may not be as good a scorer as Derozan but under high usage he could replicate what DeRozan brought to the table while being considerably better defensively. Lowry has declined statistically over the years but he impacts the game mainly with his intangibles. His pnr with Jonas was the Raptors most effective, efficient offense. Ja comes in with his athleticism & passing coming off Jonas screening ability if he has any consistency from range out the gate best believe I think this team will be better than expected. Put versatile defenders who can seamlessly switch, shoot the 3 ball around a Jonas/JA pnr screening action & yeah, I can envision unexpected success.



Noah is a former DPOY, Gasol is a former DPOY, Jonas is labelled a poor defender. Here's their Drtg with Memphis

Gasol 106 Drtg
Noah 105 Drtg
Jonas 105 Drtg

To lend to my point Raptors drafted a defensive pnr big man in Poeltl who posted impressive defensive numbers with last years Raptors bench unit.

He had a 125 Drtg playing with the starting unit Jonas was ties to. Look at Gasol against the Bucks, they're not unlike the Cavs roster. He like Jonas can be stretched out but he's slower footed


JV's defensive problem is that he can't guard the PnR. That was why he got killed in the playoffs. In the regular season (especially towards the end when games aren't quite as important for some teams), his defense is fine. He defends the paint and sometimes gets put in the PnR and we pay for it. But he then helps make up for it on the offensive end. We'll have to see but there is a chance he opts out or we move him for an additional asset. I think a decent team to compare next year's team to is this year's Atlanta team. Trae's vision was great for them like we hope Ja's will be for us. They had a couple decent vets in Bazemore and Dedmon. Collins was great on offense and contributed to winning on a similar level to what JJJ hopefully will (though I expect JJJ to be a bit better due to his defense). Prince and Heurter are good young players. It will depend on what we get back for Conley, but I think our team likely finishes about like the Hawks did which was 5th worst record. I say we end up around 5-7 and are in a similar position to convey as we were this year.


Hope you're right about that.

Did you watch the Raptors, Bucks game last night? Did Gasol look any better getting spaced out by the Bucks than Jonas would have by the Cavs?. Bucks are a carbon copy of the Cavs, Star dribble penetration, kick outs, surrounded by shooters. Giannis is as hard to stop as LeBron down hill but he doesn't have Lebron's range. Difference defensively being, Raptors can sag off of Giannis, not Lebron. In the Conley trade thread I predicted this result & said as much. You could see Gasol getting exposed in the Orlando & Philly series everytime he was stretched, he's slower footed than Jonas. There's also a big difference in personnel to consider. Gasol is playing with Pascal, Kawhi & Green a much better defensive compliment, than playing with Ibaka at the 4 where he's declined, rookie OG & DeRozan. Gasol provided no offense in the first 2 games (3-20), no rebounding & he was even more useless in space than Jonas would have been. He got benched by the 3rd Q & wasn't brought back even though Pascal was in foul trouble with 5 fouls.

The only team that did & had that offensive miss match to take the Raptors, Jonas out, was the Cavs Love/Lebron front court. Love stretched Jonas & posted Ibaka. I have no doubt Raptors would have handled everyone else in the East. I'm not denying Jonas can & does struggle in pnr action & getting stretched out, like in the Hawks blow out game but this is where Jackson who was sitting comes into play at the 5, in a small ball lineup.

Sorry for the late responses, I'm doing some home renovations.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#63 » by Whole Truth » Sun May 19, 2019 4:23 pm

Saw a trade rumor where Cavs were interested in Hayward. Suggested was J.R. Smiths 15m/3m guaranteed contract involved.

If Memphis are considering a Conley trade to Boston in the event Kyrie walks, they could involve the Cavs to shed some of Haywards contract depending on the assets Boston is willing to add in trade.

Memphis recieve - Pick #14 & 20 Smiths 15m/3m guaranteed contract, shed half of Conley's contract by waiving Smith, filler.

Boston recieve - Conley

Cavs recieve - Hayward

If Johnson were to fall to 14, I'd consider this deal & draft Herro at 20, waive Smith/Bradley to shed 29m.
VCfor3
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,123
Joined: May 11, 2017
 

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#64 » by VCfor3 » Sun May 19, 2019 4:40 pm

Whole Truth wrote:Saw a trade rumor where Cavs were interested in Hayward. Suggested was J.R. Smiths 15m/3m guaranteed contract involved.

If Memphis are considering a Conley trade to Boston in the event Kyrie walks, they could involve the Cavs to shed some of Haywards contract depending on the assets Boston is willing to add in trade.

Memphis recieve - Pick #14 & 20 Smiths 15m/3m guaranteed contract, shed half of Conley's contract by waiving Smith, filler.

Boston recieve - Conley

Cavs recieve - Hayward

If Johnson were to fall to 14, I'd consider this deal & draft Herro at 20, waive Smith/Bradley to shed 29m.


I'd be fine with that but it would put the Cavs into the luxury tax. I'm not sure that would be worth it to them unless they could dump salary cheap somewhere else.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#65 » by Whole Truth » Sun May 19, 2019 5:04 pm

"Recent speculation has that former Vanderbilt PG Darius Garland dropped out of the NBA Combine because he has received a ‘promise’ from an early drafting team. It could be the Los Angeles Lakers with the first 3 spots all but confirmed".

Another rumor claimed Knicks were more interested in Morant than RJ. The author of that rumor is assuming LA is the team of interest when it could be the Knicks. Either way, this is good news for Memphis with both Suns & Chicago hoping Garland would drop to 6/7. With that option off the table, Memphis could target the Suns or Chicago's pick/s. Either by flipping Ball or Conley straight up.

It's possible the reason Garland got the guarantee at 4 is to be a cheap backup & future replacement if Ball is moved for a ready now vet PG. Assuming It could be for Conley. Suns would like a defensive playmaking PG to compliment Booker, where Ball would fit the bill.

Memphis trade (Conley) - receive - (#6, Jackson, 23m cap space)

Lakers trade (Ball, 23m cap space) - receive - (Conley) Garland is promised 4th to back him up, they sign a big FA, keep Ingram.

Suns trade (#6, Jackson) - receive - (Ball)
or
Chicago trade (#7, Dunn) - receive - (Ball)
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#66 » by Whole Truth » Sun May 19, 2019 5:09 pm

VCfor3 wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:Saw a trade rumor where Cavs were interested in Hayward. Suggested was J.R. Smiths 15m/3m guaranteed contract involved.

If Memphis are considering a Conley trade to Boston in the event Kyrie walks, they could involve the Cavs to shed some of Haywards contract depending on the assets Boston is willing to add in trade.

Memphis recieve - Pick #14 & 20 Smiths 15m/3m guaranteed contract, shed half of Conley's contract by waiving Smith, filler.

Boston recieve - Conley

Cavs recieve - Hayward

If Johnson were to fall to 14, I'd consider this deal & draft Herro at 20, waive Smith/Bradley to shed 29m.


I'd be fine with that but it would put the Cavs into the luxury tax. I'm not sure that would be worth it to them unless they could dump salary cheap somewhere else.


I knew I should have been more detailed, there's another player involved from the Cavs to offset Haywards 30m, If Smith's contract is worth 15m, the 15m filler could be anyone of Knight 14m, Clarkson 12m or Thompson 17m but the article didn't mention a full trade only that Boston could shed Smiths salary being partially guaranteed.
VCfor3
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,123
Joined: May 11, 2017
 

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#67 » by VCfor3 » Sun May 19, 2019 7:27 pm

Whole Truth wrote:"Recent speculation has that former Vanderbilt PG Darius Garland dropped out of the NBA Combine because he has received a ‘promise’ from an early drafting team. It could be the Los Angeles Lakers with the first 3 spots all but confirmed".

Another rumor claimed Knicks were more interested in Morant than RJ. The author of that rumor is assuming LA is the team of interest when it could be the Knicks. Either way, this is good news for Memphis with both Suns & Chicago hoping Garland would drop to 6/7. With that option off the table, Memphis could target the Suns or Chicago's pick/s. Either by flipping Ball or Conley straight up.

It's possible the reason Garland got the guarantee at 4 is to be a cheap backup & future replacement if Ball is moved for a ready now vet PG. Assuming It could be for Conley. Suns would like a defensive playmaking PG to compliment Booker, where Ball would fit the bill.

Memphis trade (Conley) - receive - (#6, Jackson, 23m cap space)

Lakers trade (Ball, 23m cap space) - receive - (Conley) Garland is promised 4th to back him up, they sign a big FA, keep Ingram.

Suns trade (#6, Jackson) - receive - (Ball)
or
Chicago trade (#7, Dunn) - receive - (Ball)


I think the Suns promised Garland. There is no reason for the Lakers to since it is all but guaranteed the teams ahead of them won't take Garland. Why promise him if you may trade that pick anyway or have a different trade go down where you don't need a PG anymore. As for trading for Conley, the Lakers won't consider that until FA. They'd prefer to sign Kawhi or Kyrie instead of paying to acquire Conley.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#68 » by Whole Truth » Sun May 19, 2019 9:01 pm

VCfor3 wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:"Recent speculation has that former Vanderbilt PG Darius Garland dropped out of the NBA Combine because he has received a ‘promise’ from an early drafting team. It could be the Los Angeles Lakers with the first 3 spots all but confirmed".

Another rumor claimed Knicks were more interested in Morant than RJ. The author of that rumor is assuming LA is the team of interest when it could be the Knicks. Either way, this is good news for Memphis with both Suns & Chicago hoping Garland would drop to 6/7. With that option off the table, Memphis could target the Suns or Chicago's pick/s. Either by flipping Ball or Conley straight up.

It's possible the reason Garland got the guarantee at 4 is to be a cheap backup & future replacement if Ball is moved for a ready now vet PG. Assuming It could be for Conley. Suns would like a defensive playmaking PG to compliment Booker, where Ball would fit the bill.

Memphis trade (Conley) - receive - (#6, Jackson, 23m cap space)

Lakers trade (Ball, 23m cap space) - receive - (Conley) Garland is promised 4th to back him up, they sign a big FA, keep Ingram.

Suns trade (#6, Jackson) - receive - (Ball)
or
Chicago trade (#7, Dunn) - receive - (Ball)


I think the Suns promised Garland. There is no reason for the Lakers to since it is all but guaranteed the teams ahead of them won't take Garland. Why promise him if you may trade that pick anyway or have a different trade go down where you don't need a PG anymore. As for trading for Conley, the Lakers won't consider that until FA. They'd prefer to sign Kawhi or Kyrie instead of paying to acquire Conley.



John Gambadoro

@Gambo987

If someone promised Vandy point guard Darius Garland it wasn’t the Phoenix Suns. I’m certain the Suns will have interest in him but no promise.


Cavs have no need & he's not passing the Suns so it's either Knicks or LA, unless Memphis are bluffing about Morant.

Garland shares agent Rich Paul with LeBron James.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#69 » by Whole Truth » Sun May 19, 2019 9:20 pm

“Welcome Darius Garland to our 2019 Draft Class! @dariusgarland22,” Klutch Sports tweeted back in February.

ESPN’s Jonathan Givony called Garland a “strong fit” next to James and Ball.
VCfor3
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,123
Joined: May 11, 2017
 

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#70 » by VCfor3 » Mon May 20, 2019 12:29 am

If JV opts out, I think I'd want to waive Bradley and move Conley to a team for mostly pure cap space (plus assets). That should give us enough cap space to make a generous offer to Malcom Brogdon. It will be an overpay for him to make MIL not match but he'd be a great fit next to Ja. Secondary ball handler/playmaker, solid defense, could make all the beautiful open looks Ja is likely to generate. Though you'd like him to be slightly younger, he's only 26 and only has a couple years of NBA grind on his body. The foot issue needs to be checked out but it isn't a terrible path forward if JV leaves.
VCfor3
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,123
Joined: May 11, 2017
 

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#71 » by VCfor3 » Mon May 20, 2019 1:08 am

Whole Truth wrote:
VCfor3 wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:"Recent speculation has that former Vanderbilt PG Darius Garland dropped out of the NBA Combine because he has received a ‘promise’ from an early drafting team. It could be the Los Angeles Lakers with the first 3 spots all but confirmed".

Another rumor claimed Knicks were more interested in Morant than RJ. The author of that rumor is assuming LA is the team of interest when it could be the Knicks. Either way, this is good news for Memphis with both Suns & Chicago hoping Garland would drop to 6/7. With that option off the table, Memphis could target the Suns or Chicago's pick/s. Either by flipping Ball or Conley straight up.

It's possible the reason Garland got the guarantee at 4 is to be a cheap backup & future replacement if Ball is moved for a ready now vet PG. Assuming It could be for Conley. Suns would like a defensive playmaking PG to compliment Booker, where Ball would fit the bill.

Memphis trade (Conley) - receive - (#6, Jackson, 23m cap space)

Lakers trade (Ball, 23m cap space) - receive - (Conley) Garland is promised 4th to back him up, they sign a big FA, keep Ingram.

Suns trade (#6, Jackson) - receive - (Ball)
or
Chicago trade (#7, Dunn) - receive - (Ball)


I think the Suns promised Garland. There is no reason for the Lakers to since it is all but guaranteed the teams ahead of them won't take Garland. Why promise him if you may trade that pick anyway or have a different trade go down where you don't need a PG anymore. As for trading for Conley, the Lakers won't consider that until FA. They'd prefer to sign Kawhi or Kyrie instead of paying to acquire Conley.



John Gambadoro

@Gambo987

If someone promised Vandy point guard Darius Garland it wasn’t the Phoenix Suns. I’m certain the Suns will have interest in him but no promise.


Cavs have no need & he's not passing the Suns so it's either Knicks or LA, unless Memphis are bluffing about Morant.

Garland shares agent Rich Paul with LeBron James.


There are other people tweeting that word around the combine is PHX likely did it. Supposedly MIN may have promised Rui as well.
dark-child
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,831
And1: 125
Joined: Nov 08, 2005
     

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#72 » by dark-child » Mon May 20, 2019 1:55 pm

When are we going to have the conversation as to whether the Front Office would even consider two known commodities (rookie contracts) VS. the hope, potential of the #2 pick?

Is the #2 pick > Lonzo Ball & Brandon Ingram?

Is the #2 pick > Dennis Smith Jr. & Kevin Knox?

The premise is that the Pelicans have the #1 pick and Zion Williams but the ability to pair him with Ja Morant and possibly either the #3 or #4 pick would be the key to finishing off a Anthony Davis trade. The Pelicans may not be inclined to the current assets of the Lakers & the Knicks but if the #2 pick paired with the #3 or #4 pick may be too much to pass up. Could the Grizzlies consider being a part of this deal?
VCfor3
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,123
Joined: May 11, 2017
 

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#73 » by VCfor3 » Mon May 20, 2019 2:22 pm

dark-child wrote:When are we going to have the conversation as to whether the Front Office would even consider two known commodities (rookie contracts) VS. the hope, potential of the #2 pick?

Is the #2 pick > Lonzo Ball & Brandon Ingram?

Is the #2 pick > Dennis Smith Jr. & Kevin Knox?

The premise is that the Pelicans have the #1 pick and Zion Williams but the ability to pair him with Ja Morant and possibly either the #3 or #4 pick would be the key to finishing off a Anthony Davis trade. The Pelicans may not be inclined to the current assets of the Lakers & the Knicks but if the #2 pick paired with the #3 or #4 pick may be too much to pass up. Could the Grizzlies consider being a part of this deal?


I would rather have Ja over either of those two pairings tbh. We aren't exactly a FA destination so getting franchise players likely needs to happen through the draft. Ball is injured but is a decent player. Ingram still has potential but I doubt he is a star plus the blood clot issue could end his career at any time. DSJ and Knox are decent but I just am not all that excited about either. Ja certainly has his flaws but his passing is superb and he seems to make others around him better. I personally like the gamble of a Ja/JJJ core but understand if someone else prefers a more proven commodity.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#74 » by Whole Truth » Mon May 20, 2019 2:27 pm

dark-child wrote:When are we going to have the conversation as to whether the Front Office would even consider two known commodities (rookie contracts) VS. the hope, potential of the #2 pick?

Is the #2 pick > Lonzo Ball & Brandon Ingram?

Is the #2 pick > Dennis Smith Jr. & Kevin Knox?

The premise is that the Pelicans have the #1 pick and Zion Williams but the ability to pair him with Ja Morant and possibly either the #3 or #4 pick would be the key to finishing off a Anthony Davis trade. The Pelicans may not be inclined to the current assets of the Lakers & the Knicks but if the #2 pick paired with the #3 or #4 pick may be too much to pass up. Could the Grizzlies consider being a part of this deal?


In your hypothetical, I'd inevitably keep Morant.

One scenario I might have considered is Ingram, #4 Garland, if Ingram wasn't an injury risk.
psman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,884
And1: 5,960
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#75 » by psman2 » Tue May 21, 2019 3:44 am

dark-child wrote:When are we going to have the conversation as to whether the Front Office would even consider two known commodities (rookie contracts) VS. the hope, potential of the #2 pick?

Is the #2 pick > Lonzo Ball & Brandon Ingram?

Is the #2 pick > Dennis Smith Jr. & Kevin Knox?

The premise is that the Pelicans have the #1 pick and Zion Williams but the ability to pair him with Ja Morant and possibly either the #3 or #4 pick would be the key to finishing off a Anthony Davis trade. The Pelicans may not be inclined to the current assets of the Lakers & the Knicks but if the #2 pick paired with the #3 or #4 pick may be too much to pass up. Could the Grizzlies consider being a part of this deal?


I would Keep Ja over getting all four of those guys.
jman3134
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 19,490
And1: 1,337
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Follow me on Twitter: JTMBasketball
Contact:
 

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#76 » by jman3134 » Tue May 21, 2019 7:26 am

You go with Ja over the talent that has proven to be thoroughly mediocre Ball. Smith Jr. at this point is an inefficient scoring 1. If the goal is to win and sell tickets, Ja is way better than the options listed. There is a reason the Lakers didn't make the playoffs with those two playing alongside Lebron James, arguably the best player of the last decade. Even if you want to counter that his skillset is fading with age, it is an extreme exaggeration if you believe he has fallen far enough that he can't lead a team to the playoffs in the west.
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,828
And1: 11,465
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#77 » by wco81 » Tue May 21, 2019 1:29 pm

Which way are the Grizzlies going to go with the coach?

Someone to install pace and space elements with the expected drafting of Ja?

RIP Grit and Grind?
VCfor3
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Forum Mod - Grizzlies
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,123
Joined: May 11, 2017
 

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#78 » by VCfor3 » Tue May 21, 2019 2:12 pm

wco81 wrote:Which way are the Grizzlies going to go with the coach?

Someone to install pace and space elements with the expected drafting of Ja?

RIP Grit and Grind?


Grit and Grind is likely done and honestly has sorta been done as much as fans may hate to admit it. I'm not totally sure what direction they are going with their coach though. They've been interviewing different people but we have no news beyond that.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#79 » by Whole Truth » Tue May 21, 2019 9:06 pm

Cavs are in the Luxury tax & are not a playoff team. They can buyout Smith partially guaranteed contract for 10-11m savings but it still wouldn't get them under the tax.

What if they managed to trade for Bradley's 3m partially guaranteed 12m contract to dump an added 9m?.

If Cavs could buyout both Smith & Bradley, they could potentially shed around 20m in salary to get under the lux tax.

One of three contracts in that range, (Thompson, Henson, Clarkson).

Cavs trade - (Clarckson & Houston 26 2019 first) for (Bradley 3m partially guaranteed contract).

If Memphis were or are willing to pick up Bradley's salary, they recieve a similar player in Clarkson in return but with a draft asset.

Houston pick @ 26, Memphis could draft Thybulle as someone here showed interest in his game for the salary dump.
Whole Truth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 3,842
Joined: Mar 19, 2018

Re: Potential Offseason Moves 

Post#80 » by Whole Truth » Tue May 21, 2019 9:20 pm

I saw a Minnesota trade offer that wasn't bad, that if a player of interest falls to 11, I think I could milk further.

In a rebuild it makes sense to target reclamation projects, players with high upside that have disappointed that could maybe at some point turn things around.


Minnesota trade - (Dieng, Teague, #11) receive (Conley)

My suggestion to milk this trade is to flip Teague to a team like Orlando who needs a PG & is ready to contend for Fultz who's a reclamation project.

Memphis trade - (Conley) receive (Deing, Fultz, #11, small 4m TE)

Return to Memphis Grizzlies