Whole Truth wrote:I saw a Minnesota trade offer that wasn't bad, that if a player of interest falls to 11, I think I could milk further.
In a rebuild it makes sense to target reclamation projects, players with high upside that have disappointed that could maybe at some point turn things around.
Minnesota trade - (Dieng, Teague, #11) receive (Conley)
My suggestion to milk this trade is to flip Teague to a team like Orlando who needs a PG & is ready to contend for Fultz who's a reclamation project.
Memphis trade - (Conley) receive (Deing, Fultz, #11, small 4m TE)
I don't really see any teams giving any for thing Teague until they have their shot at FA pgs first. So I wouldn't do that trade banking on being about to flip Teague for anything. But maybe if Orlando doesn't land a better option they would give up some 2nds to swap him for Mozgov.
Regarding your other post. If Cleveland wants to flip one of their bad contracts for Bradley we would have to 1. Guarantee Bradley's full contract and trade him to Cleveland or 2. have cap space to absorb the difference in the Cleveland contract and Bradley's small guarantee. We currently have no cap space so option 2 is out the door and option 1 doesn't really save Cleveland much if any salary to include a asset worthwhile like pick 26.














