newyorker4ever wrote:awy wrote:free throw% and steal% are big predictors of shooting success and general stardom at the next level. both are bad for RJ.
throw in the limited handle and craft and it's not very exciting.
I'd have no problem if the Knicks decided to trade down from the #3 spot to add more assets/draft picks especially if they do strike out in free agency and decide to just keep building through the draft.
http://elitesportsny.com/2019/05/23/new-york-knicks-greatest-nba-draft-weapon-is-trading-down/
The New York Knicks greatest NBA Draft weapon is not selecting RJ Barrett at No. 3, but rather trading down and collecting assets.
The third overall pick in the 2019 NBA Draft is worth more as a trade asset than any selection the New York Knicks could make, which is why their top priority should be to trade back in the lottery.
After a dismal season posting an NBA worst record of 17-65, the new changes implemented to the NBA Draft Lottery cost the Knicks the chance to draft Duke’s budding superstar, Zion Williamson. But drafting third also means missing out on the next best alternative, Murray State guard Ja Morant. Instead, if the Knicks hold onto their pick, they are almost certain to select Duke forward R.J. Barrett.
But is settling for the third-ranked prospect, according to ESPN, in a draft filled with two generational talents, really the best course of action?
The answer is no.
I don't consider Ja Morant a generational talent, considering he had the ball in his hands 95% of the time. Given the new fast-pace game and 3 point shooting, that type of possession time will not likely happen in the NBA.
It's more of:
1 = Zion
2 and 2b = Ja and JR.