Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
newyorker4ever wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:NoLayupRule wrote:And while he’s not my favorite you gotta love the athleticism of adding dsj to that group
Dsj
RJ
Knox
?
Mitch
Speaking of DSJ’s athleticism, I thought this clip was cool
If only having great athleticism for dunks was something i cared about from my point guard then i'd think we already had our starting point guard on the team. Unfortunately i need much more from my starting PG if we're gonna actually win.
Dantares wrote:DrCoach wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
I see him as more of a SF especially since we already have Dotson and Trier there. RJ has some good passing skills and can run a PnR. The shooting - just like with Zion - will be a work in progress. But the upside is there. RJ also has the most market value if we're considering trading it.
If we want someone who can come in and play/start, then we should trade down and get Hunter and acquire another asset.
Wha???? Are you saying that R.J. isn’t ready to come in and start?
If he doesn't improve his jumpshot he may struggle not having the ball in his hands. I don't know if he would start or not. But if kyrie and kd are here rj' s role is going to change drastically.
harden was more advanced and he he was more well equipped for the NBA because he had a much better jumpshot than rj coming out of college and even he struggled his rookie year. It's already hard enough making the jump from college to the nba, having an unreliable jumpshot makes it even harder. Look at lonzo and fultz, guys that were drafted high but struggled because they couldn't shoot.
awy wrote:culver is better than rj tho. will be a more valuable player to a winning team.
knicks fans are so dumb with what is important to winning its not surprising to see so many rj stans
newyorker4ever wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Speaking of DSJ’s athleticism, I thought this clip was cool
If only having great athleticism for dunks was something i cared about from my point guard then i'd think we already had our starting point guard on the team. Unfortunately i need much more from my starting PG if we're gonna actually win.
https://t.co/bBxjkc14oF
Capn'O wrote:Irregardless of who we draft or acquire as a big fish, this team will need more shooting.
F N 11 wrote:Capn'O wrote:Irregardless of who we draft or acquire as a big fish, this team will need more shooting.
Front office has said that is a focus. Wouldn’t be shocked if the second rounder is a shooter. Any big fish we have wouldn’t have a problem shooting. Dotson should take a leap as well.
Capn'O wrote:F N 11 wrote:Capn'O wrote:Irregardless of who we draft or acquire as a big fish, this team will need more shooting.
Front office has said that is a focus. Wouldn’t be shocked if the second rounder is a shooter. Any big fish we have wouldn’t have a problem shooting. Dotson should take a leap as well.
Sure. Or another trade happens. But we'll need more than a rookie.
F N 11 wrote:Knicks have no alphas but let’s skip over the only clear leader/Alpha. Dude was the leader over Zion period!! For some role player. Who would go in the second half of the lottery.
If any other team had the 3rd pick their wouldn’t be a discussion but this is the Knicks fan base. Take bpa and stop with all this trade down ish. Only team that should be talking trade down is the lakers.
3toheadmelo wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:
If only having great athleticism for dunks was something i cared about from my point guard then i'd think we already had our starting point guard on the team. Unfortunately i need much more from my starting PG if we're gonna actually win.
https://t.co/bBxjkc14oF
Expecting a break out year next season. He has all the tools to be a star PG. It's great to see he's focused on shooting/conditioning. That's what he needs to work on the most.
DrCoach wrote:awy wrote:culver is better than rj tho. will be a more valuable player to a winning team.
knicks fans are so dumb with what is important to winning its not surprising to see so many rj stans
RJ HS was undefeated
He played for Duke
He Led Team Canada over Team USA with 38 pts and 15rebs
You are not very bright or intuitive
K-DOT wrote:DrCoach wrote:awy wrote:culver is better than rj tho. will be a more valuable player to a winning team.
knicks fans are so dumb with what is important to winning its not surprising to see so many rj stans
RJ HS was undefeated
He played for Duke
He Led Team Canada over Team USA with 38 pts and 15rebs
None of that really means much, plenty of guys are great at the high school level never pan out, and playing for Duke doesn't do anything for me. Okafor played for Duke, how's he doing?
Plus, citing his volume stats without mentioning his mediocre at best efficiency and lack of defense isn't a good argumentYou are not very bright or intuitive
That's a personal attack
K-DOT wrote:DrCoach wrote:awy wrote:culver is better than rj tho. will be a more valuable player to a winning team.
knicks fans are so dumb with what is important to winning its not surprising to see so many rj stans
RJ HS was undefeated
He played for Duke
He Led Team Canada over Team USA with 38 pts and 15rebs
None of that really means much, plenty of guys are great at the high school level never pan out, and playing for Duke doesn't do anything for me. Okafor played for Duke, how's he doing?
Plus, citing his volume stats without mentioning his mediocre at best efficiency and lack of defense isn't a good argumentYou are not very bright or intuitive
That's a personal attack
K-DOT wrote:DrCoach wrote:awy wrote:culver is better than rj tho. will be a more valuable player to a winning team.
knicks fans are so dumb with what is important to winning its not surprising to see so many rj stans
RJ HS was undefeated
He played for Duke
He Led Team Canada over Team USA with 38 pts and 15rebs
None of that really means much, plenty of guys are great at the high school level never pan out, and playing for Duke doesn't do anything for me. Okafor played for Duke, how's he doing?
Plus, citing his volume stats without mentioning his mediocre at best efficiency and lack of defense isn't a good argumentYou are not very bright or intuitive
That's a personal attack
awy wrote:culver is better than rj tho. will be a more valuable player to a winning team.
knicks fans are so dumb with what is important to winning its not surprising to see so many rj stans
Capn'O wrote:Irregardless of who we draft or acquire as a big fish, this team will need more shooting.
newyorker4ever wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:NoLayupRule wrote:And while he’s not my favorite you gotta love the athleticism of adding dsj to that group
Dsj
RJ
Knox
?
Mitch
Speaking of DSJ’s athleticism, I thought this clip was cool
If only having great athleticism for dunks was something i cared about from my point guard then i'd think we already had our starting point guard on the team. Unfortunately i need much more from my starting PG if we're gonna actually win.