ImageImageImage

Tatum and Brown

Moderators: Froob, canman1971, The Comedian, Parliament10, djFan71, ParticleMan, sully00

hondobird
Freshman
Posts: 99
And1: 77
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
       

Tatum and Brown 

Post#1 » by hondobird » Mon Jun 3, 2019 8:18 pm

You guys know the Celtics and basketball better than I do so please share with my why people seem to have concluded that Tatum and Brown will never grow into the star/top 25 type player. They are both very talented and very young still.
Would appreciate any feedback on this.

Thanks.
celtics543
Starter
Posts: 2,116
And1: 1,279
Joined: Dec 29, 2004
       

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#2 » by celtics543 » Mon Jun 3, 2019 8:44 pm

Because everyone loves to make snap judgements on young guys. A year ago Tatum was a future superstar and Brown was too much to trade for Kawhi. If they open next season playing well then they'll be future stars again.
hondobird
Freshman
Posts: 99
And1: 77
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
       

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#3 » by hondobird » Mon Jun 3, 2019 8:49 pm

thanks
User avatar
greenroom31
Head Coach
Posts: 6,147
And1: 6,837
Joined: Nov 06, 2004

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#4 » by greenroom31 » Mon Jun 3, 2019 9:01 pm

hondobird wrote:You guys know the Celtics and basketball better than I do so please share with my why people seem to have concluded that Tatum and Brown will never grow into the star/top 25 type player. They are both very talented and very young still.
Would appreciate any feedback on this.


Neither guy had the breakout type of season that was hoped for. Of course there are lots of great reasons for that, but if you view reasons as excuses, then the simple answer is they just aren't that good.

Brown started off the year poorly and it took him a couple of months to find a groove in his role off the bench. Tatum took too many long 2s, his handle didn't improve as much as hoped, and had trouble finding the balance between deferring and taking over.

Of course the mitigating factors include that GorDON was bequeathed 25-30 mpg and Brad took a page from the little league coaching playbook to try to keep everyone happy.

Spoiler:
it didn't work
Kyrie For Three
General Manager
Posts: 7,686
And1: 11,696
Joined: Jan 03, 2018

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#5 » by Kyrie For Three » Mon Jun 3, 2019 9:09 pm

Tatum has potential to be a really strong all star caliber player IMO. Brown I think has a lot more weaknesses then most C's fans want to admit.

First thing someone has to do this offseason is shake the Kobe out of Tatum. It doesn't feel right either with Kobe/Tatum.
Duke4life831
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,088
And1: 28,408
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
   

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#6 » by Duke4life831 » Mon Jun 3, 2019 9:30 pm

I think both guys each have their own glaring flaw.

Tatum: Shot selection. I truly believe shot selection is the only thing holding him back from being a borderline all star in the East. 40% 3pt shooter, 85% at the line and he finished at a very high rate of 68% at the basket last year. The problem is he is far to willing to just settle for a contested pull up mid range jumper. I think he can be deadly from the mid range, but it should never be his 1st or 2nd option. The mid range shot should be a changeup, not his go to move. He also needs to facilitate.

Brown: His handle is horrible. He is never going to be a consistent scoring threat until he improves his handle. Its way to slow and high. If he could improve his handle, he would be a terror slashing the basket. He is also a bad FT shooter and because of that, Im not sure how consistent he will be over his career from 3.
User avatar
truth18
RealGM
Posts: 37,771
And1: 40,750
Joined: Apr 17, 2011
Location: In '19, stomping you out in green Timbs
         

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#7 » by truth18 » Mon Jun 3, 2019 11:02 pm

Wouldn't mind Tatum getting bigger honestly. Dude's frame still seems slight at times banging against other SFs.
Spoiler:
Edug27 wrote:You’re like Paul Pierce with the awful takes.

Thought DMC was winning it all this year? Thought GS still had a cakewalk without KD? LOL
ViperGTS wrote:Have you ever been to Africa?
RIP(ieces) ViperGTS: 2016-2019 You remain in our hearts, always—eternally holding an enormous L
captain green
Veteran
Posts: 2,694
And1: 1,111
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Contact:
         

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#8 » by captain green » Tue Jun 4, 2019 12:11 am

Both are top 10 players under 25 so there isn't much to aegue about. To me this season proved they can both be great. The early minutes of hayward and late game shift of brown proved the have adapting skills. Keeping brown and tatum with smart will be a great trio to build around.
We always talk about there’s A-to-Z… really, there’s A-to-G or -E,’” Ainge told Celtics.com of a team’s typical offseason agenda. “This year, there’s definitely A-to-Z.” : danny ainge
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 19,842
And1: 7,576
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#9 » by Fencer reregistered » Tue Jun 4, 2019 12:42 am

Also, great wing players tend to be all-World on defense early in their careers, before hitting their offensive peaks. These guys are good, but they don't look like lockdown defenders.

Exception: Paul Pierce, who locked people down only in crunch time, and probably peaked in that around the same time he peaked offensively.
radcot
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,984
And1: 7,881
Joined: May 07, 2012
 

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#10 » by radcot » Tue Jun 4, 2019 12:42 am

Do they have weaknesses? Sure. Have they shown flashes of having very high ceilings? Also sure. Will they refine their games and develop the consistency necessary to be All-Star caliber players? Tatum is 21. Brown is 22. Anyone who claims to know the answer to that last question is imho full of ****.
hondobird
Freshman
Posts: 99
And1: 77
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
       

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#11 » by hondobird » Tue Jun 4, 2019 12:53 am

happy to see these responses

I am a believer in keeping these two

Think they can both be perennial all stars

Thanks for all the comments
[EverGreen]
Junior
Posts: 298
And1: 124
Joined: Jul 04, 2013

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#12 » by [EverGreen] » Tue Jun 4, 2019 1:24 am

I think you need to treat Tatum and Brown differently.

Tatum, had a down year after an amazing rookie campaign. This often happens and I think a lot of the problem was being to comfortable shooting from mid-range. With an off-season to review, I'm confident he'll continue to his original path to being in the conversation for best small forward type in the league.

Brown on the other hand seems like a jack of all trades, master of none. At different points this season, he looked a great slasher, a great defender, a great shooter but he's streaky. He needs more minutes, but with Hayward on board I don't see that happening.
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,936
And1: 4,686
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#13 » by Bleeding Green » Tue Jun 4, 2019 1:45 am

A lot of it centers around their very poor passing ability. You very seldom see players who have such poor court vision and passing ability make it into any kind of top-25 list unless they are unbelievable talents otherwise. The only guys who you can put in the top-25 who don't pass/create for others are guys like Rudy Gobert. Tatum improved here this season to some extent, but I don't ever see him being an above-average passer, and when you see Brown make even a routine pass it is worthy of note, which isn't a great sign.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
sully00
Senior Mod - Celtics
Senior Mod - Celtics
Posts: 26,800
And1: 6,007
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#14 » by sully00 » Tue Jun 4, 2019 2:05 am

Bleeding Green wrote:A lot of it centers around their very poor passing ability. You very seldom see players who have such poor court vision and passing ability make it into any kind of top-25 list unless they are unbelievable talents otherwise. The only guys who you can put in the top-25 who don't pass/create for others are guys like Rudy Gobert. Tatum improved here this season to some extent, but I don't ever see him being an above-average passer, and when you see Brown make even a routine pass it is worthy of note, which isn't a great sign.


I don't agree with this. Brown doesn't turn the ball over and he doesn't dominate the ball he is a finisher nobody cared that James Worthy avg around 2 apg most of his career because his job was to finish. When he got older he became a better passer. Kevin McHale and Karl Malone were total black holes. Klay Thompson isn't a playmaker but everyone wants him on their team. If you dominate the ball and don't pass that is a problem but if you catch and shoot and attack the rim and minimize the BS other guys can create shots for others.

I think Tatum was trying to come into his own as a go to offensive option and learned a lot of what doesn't work. I don't think he is a bad passer as much as his judgement around when and where to isolate got a little weird but the whole team sort of broke down the more the ball didn't touch Al's hands.
LuckyLeprechaun
Senior
Posts: 630
And1: 676
Joined: Jul 24, 2015
 

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#15 » by LuckyLeprechaun » Tue Jun 4, 2019 2:32 am

They can be great, but players reaching the transcendent level is just so rare. There's probably an average of one player like that every 2-3 drafts.

People are down on Brown/Tatum because they see the possibility of getting an actual transcendent player in his prime and value that higher than betting on the low odds that one or both of them will be the rare exceptions and reach that level.
Gomes3PC
Head Coach
Posts: 6,841
And1: 2,503
Joined: Feb 10, 2006

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#16 » by Gomes3PC » Tue Jun 4, 2019 2:33 am

Neither are creators. That is my fundamental concern for both. They are both good to great in terms of potential 1v1 scorers, defenders and Tatum has plus-plus potential as a shooter long term (if not already).

However, neither are natural playmakers for others. That is not an inherent guarantee they won't be stars, it just makes it a lot harder. Kawhi has shown you can be that, and to a lesser extent guys like Durant and Klay, but most top-25 players are good to elite in this respect.

Also, neither are good at drawing fouls. I'd say there is more promise as both continue to mature/get stronger, but if you don't draw tons of fouls or tons of scoring opportunities for teammates, it's unlikely you become an All-NBA type.
Gomes3PC
Head Coach
Posts: 6,841
And1: 2,503
Joined: Feb 10, 2006

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#17 » by Gomes3PC » Tue Jun 4, 2019 2:36 am

I will say this - if we "rebuild" this year, one benefit of that will be both guys will be forced to become primary initiators (or should be asked to). Paul George in part became a plus playmaker because in his 3rd year the Pacers basically put the ball in his hands and told him to learn how to run the P&R. His turnovers spiked but IMO it was really important in his development as an all-around playmaker for his teammates.

Tatum especially needs more of this. They need to force him to work on his handle and vision in the P&R.
Parasite
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,585
And1: 1,316
Joined: May 06, 2005
     

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#18 » by Parasite » Tue Jun 4, 2019 2:53 am

Tatum could and quite honestly should be a future star. I don’t see it in Brown. Good player but not star material.
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,936
And1: 4,686
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#19 » by Bleeding Green » Tue Jun 4, 2019 3:37 am

sully00 wrote:
Bleeding Green wrote:A lot of it centers around their very poor passing ability. You very seldom see players who have such poor court vision and passing ability make it into any kind of top-25 list unless they are unbelievable talents otherwise. The only guys who you can put in the top-25 who don't pass/create for others are guys like Rudy Gobert. Tatum improved here this season to some extent, but I don't ever see him being an above-average passer, and when you see Brown make even a routine pass it is worthy of note, which isn't a great sign.


I don't agree with this. Brown doesn't turn the ball over and he doesn't dominate the ball he is a finisher nobody cared that James Worthy avg around 2 apg most of his career because his job was to finish. When he got older he became a better passer. Kevin McHale and Karl Malone were total black holes. Klay Thompson isn't a playmaker but everyone wants him on their team. If you dominate the ball and don't pass that is a problem but if you catch and shoot and attack the rim and minimize the BS other guys can create shots for others.

I think Tatum was trying to come into his own as a go to offensive option and learned a lot of what doesn't work. I don't think he is a bad passer as much as his judgement around when and where to isolate got a little weird but the whole team sort of broke down the more the ball didn't touch Al's hands.

Yeah if you need to compare them to the development tracks of Hall of Fame players, it's not that great of an argument. James Worthy eventually became a good passer. McHale was a power forward from a different era. Klay Thompson is the most overrated player in the NBA to me. Put him on some team without Steph Curry. Also he's one of the best shooters in NBA history. What are these generational traits that Tatum/Brown possess that will allow them to be top-25 NBA players without the ability to create for others? Brown and Tatum have very little innate feel for the game and where they are on the court, especially offensively. This 100 pct has to change or they'll both just be what-ifs.

But they're both young, so who knows. Generally players don't follow the James Worthy path, or we'd have a few thousand James Worthys in NBA history.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 22,735
And1: 12,405
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Tatum and Brown 

Post#20 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Tue Jun 4, 2019 6:26 am

Parasite wrote:Tatum could and quite honestly should be a future star. I don’t see it in Brown. Good player but not star material.


Both could be. Jaylen isn't as skilled, but is better in the open court and a better defender as of now. His attitude is also a lot more alpha than Tatum. Middleton never averaged more than 13ppg until his 4th season when he was 23. Look at him now. Jimmy played 38mpg in his 3rd NBA season at age 24 and averaged 13ppg. Hayward 14ppg in year 3 as a 22 year old. The most notable one, Kawhi 13ppg in his 3rd year at age 22. Most of those guys took great jumps in year 4..Paul George took a great one in year 3. Tatum at age 20 was already more productive than all these all stars at a more advanced age. Jaylen is pretty much right there with all of them. Obviously each player has his learning curve and reasons to why he did or did not play more, shoot more or whatever..but players take a while to develop. Victor Oladipo regressed for two straight years and looked like a nobody until he blew up in year 5 as a 25 year old. Just imagine where Tatum and Brown could be at 25.
A new dawn will rise in Boston. ‎#StayLoyal THANK YOU TRUTH!

Return to Boston Celtics