bishnykfan wrote:bringbackhoffa wrote:bishnykfan wrote:
This isn’t about “market value” really for the players. You can’t really compare it to our initial draft when everyone had $1000 to spend and what the market was two years ago.
With a hard cap the players will never truly get what they can get in the real NBA so to compare what an outlier like Siakam will get doesn’t add up to our game.
but it should be a bit closer in valuation if you look at the 2014 NBA draft the following players are making 18-20% of cap or more:
Wiggins- 20.9%
Jabari- 16.2%
Embiid- 22.1%
AG- 18.9%
Lavine- 17.3%
Gary Harris- 14.0%
Capela- 12.5%
Jokic- 21.5%
while the below players are making 10-18% of cap
Smart- 8.9%
Exum- 9.4%
Randle- 7.4%
TJ Warren- 10.8%
Nurkic- 8.5%
Bogdan Bogdanovic- 8.9%
Kyle Anderson- 6.9%
Jordan Clarkson- 10.1%
with the extension salaries proposed only a handful of players will be making close to 10-15% of cap, with the majority making less than 10%. the 2014 draft showed 25% of the players drafted made over 10% of the cap when they came up for extension. i know we have a hard cap but i think some of these valuations especially second round picks are too low. imagine Jokic re-signing for 1% of cap in our game
It isn’t about the cap though because we have a hard cap. I put the percentages of each player compared to their teams payroll in your post. Because teams in the NBA can go over the cap they can sign those guys for more than our teams can.
Anderson makes 6.9% of his teams payroll. That is only $70 in our game. Embiid makes the most at 22.1%. That’s $225 for us.
So the highest extension IRL is only the equivalent of a $225 contract for us. Most are considerably lower than that. When you consider the money our players get upfront before the IRL contract extension kicks in, this proposal is very much in line with the real NBA.
i somewhat agree with what you are saying in terms of increasing the salaries right away as opposed to just the extension years kind of makes up for a bit of the shortfall in the long run. however i believe this kind of only applies to the top picks in the draft.
for instance Kyle anderson was the 30th pick
his rookie contract would be
3/13 $39 total
under the proposed extension percentages he would go to
3 yr extension- 13/25/25/25/25/25/25= less than 2.5% of cap on average
2 yr extension- 13/13/21/21/21/21= less than 2% of cap on average
1 yr extension- 13/13/13/17/17= less than 2% of cap on average
or for instance on a bigger disadvantage a second round pick such as Jokic (selected 41st overall)
2/9 $18 total
under the proposed extension percentages he would go to
3 yr extension- 9/18/18/18/18/18
2 yr extension- 9/9/15/15/15
1 yr extension- 9/9/12/12
i just think the percentages have to be revised perhaps on an escalating levels especially for late firsts and second rounders. i know you want to reward "good" drafting but at the same time you got to pay a player some what close to what they would get in free agency. $18 extension for a player like Jokic is too cheap, good drafting should mean you get a skilled player, not that you luck out and get to sign them to a cheap deal as well. You dont see the Denver Nuggets paying him less because they drafted well.