KnicksGod wrote:Wojina: "KD will just have to accept that if he wants the New York market, the Nets is the best he can do."
Melo Redux.
That would be hilarious watching no one care about the Nets even with those 2.
KnicksGod wrote:Wojina: "KD will just have to accept that if he wants the New York market, the Nets is the best he can do."
Melo Redux.


DowNY wrote:TGW wrote:DowNY wrote:AD’s not going to Boston. Local reporters don’t cut it.
Boston’s about to lose Kyrie and that lowers what they’re going to offer.
Sounds like you’re just making this stuff up based on your opinion. Have a good day fam.
Relax guy. I'm just passing the information.
The info you’re passing through wasn’t significant enough to pull up here and post. We got 23 days until free agency and you posting a tweet that says his “trusted source THINKS”. Not good enough. Also, idk who that man is. A blue check doesn’t warrant instant trust. Then the other info you posted was opinionated but said like it was going to happen. I’m just correcting you. If you want to hop in the convo, there’s better ways to do it.
Could’ve posted the tweet and asked us what we thought.
Could’ve asked us anything really. But you pulled up like you got rumor plug

BowlRips wrote:Just FYI
For all discussing what are cap space would look like if we absorbed AD.
Assuming outgoing salary is Knox, Frank, Mitch and 3rd Pick, we'd be left with $21,412,318 in cap space with Durant, AD, Dotson, Trier and DSJ
F N 11 wrote:my co worker who is a net fan showed me a quote from Woj saying if KD wants to play with Kyrie its brooklyn if not its Clippers. Hmmm

god shammgod wrote:let me say something...there are times to be negative, when you have a bad gm and coach, when you have overpaid guys, when the cap is f*cked up. that's the time. right now the knicks are in a good position to get guys and are in a good position even if they don't. if they don't, the cap is still clear from albatrosses. they have their picks plus others. if you're being negative now because you're psychologically preparing yourself for things to go wrong, it's just weak.
Juco24 wrote:god shammgod wrote:let me say something...there are times to be negative, when you have a bad gm and coach, when you have overpaid guys, when the cap is f*cked up. that's the time. right now the knicks are in a good position to get guys and are in a good position even if they don't. if they don't, the cap is still clear from albatrosses. they have their picks plus others. if you're being negative now because you're psychologically preparing yourself for things to go wrong, it's just weak.
![]()
![]()
![]()
PREACH!!!!

Fat Kat wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:Fat Kat wrote:
Woj trades favorable coverage for access. There was an article on it. It works for him.
i'd love to see that. makes sense to an extent in principle. i'm not going to talk to you and trust you if you're trashing my team.
it could go the other way too. bombs from disgruntled employees or whatever could fuel negative coverage for a time. the whistleblowers and snitches be out there.
From a 2014 articleWojnarowski has needed more than just a strong work ethic, though, to develop the best sources in basketball. If you look closely at his columns and talk to people in the NBA, you discover that he mixes his reporting and opinion writing in improper ways, rewarding sources with flattery and punishing the uncooperative with nastiness. In fact, it often appears as though Adrian Wojnarowski lets his sourcing dictate not just the topic but also the tone of his writing. In private, NBA reporters complain endlessly about Wojnarowski’s methods. Some of it is undoubtedly professional jealousy, but his body of work shows they also have a point.
I think Perry and Mills have become more media friendly than past GMs, but they don’t like information leaked. The Porzingis trade came out of nowhere. Woj was probably pissed they didn’t throw him a bone. I’d probably give him a little something every now and then


SARGO127 wrote:If we strike out, we need to take on expiring with assets like ATL did. Maybe the Clippers (Gallo+)?
shtolky wrote:Somehow I don't see KD being the one to follow Kyrie, more like the other way around. KD wants to be out of Curry's shadow and have his own team, so he follows Kyrie to Brooklyn of all places? I don't buy it. Woj and SAS are very good at their jobs, which is to stoke the fire.

SARGO127 wrote:If we strike out, we need to take on expiring with assets like ATL did. Maybe the Clippers (Gallo+)?
3toheadmelo wrote:This makes sense when Rich put out that tweet yesterday. They probably wanted to join the nets all along and been playing us.