No your benchmark is based on hindsight.The Corey's wrote:KGboss wrote:Well we lost Irving so if that's the benchmark for you then I guess were ugly now.The Corey's wrote:
Not if they do any scenario where wer over pay for Davis and or lose Irving for nothing and or bring back rozier and Morris.
Could be ugly.
Thing is...Irving is overrated. He wasn't a winner before Lebron got to Cleveland, and he did half of what IT did in the same amount of time, but is supposedly a superstar. Dudes got fancy handles and can shoot....but from what I saw hes not a winner.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Losing Irving for nothing instead of trading him to the nets at the deadline all because Danny gambled that he could talk.him into staying while making the same potential mistake for Davis is literally nuceular war stuff. It debilitates a franchise for years.
So no, my bench mark is a bit more than that
In the moment you make those gambles 10 out of 10 times
Toronto gambled with Kawhi and look where they are now.
If you dont take a shot what's the point
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk




















