ImageImageImage

Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1441 » by Slartibartfast » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:24 am

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
jfs1000d wrote:
CeltsfaninDC wrote:There is no way I trade brown for Ingram or smart for ball



exactly.

Brown
Smart
Memphis :wink:
2 firsts


That's a haul for AD. Brown is a rising 15 ppg scorer. Smart all nba defensive guard and the memphis pick. Three firsts including one possible lottery pick?


Wouldn't even put the Memphis pick if I'm giving Brown and Smart.

Kawhi Leonard got San Antonio less than that. This situation should be no different.


The Spurs valued DeRozan as a legit all-star. Foolishly so. And the league has seen how one sided that deal was.
The Corey's
RealGM
Posts: 12,787
And1: 8,572
Joined: Jan 29, 2006

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1442 » by The Corey's » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:24 am

Edug27 wrote:
canman1971 wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
This hasn’t nothing to do with me. I’m not making the deals. It’s been reported that Kuz is the most coveted asset here.

Oh I forgot, since it was reported it must be true. What the hell is happening to this board?


My bad. I forgot usual board etiquette.... only if it’s in our favor it’s true.. got it


Bahahha
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,125
And1: 98,277
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1443 » by zoyathedestroya » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:24 am

MagicBagley18 wrote:
zoyathedestroya wrote:
MagicBagley18 wrote:I would take smart over ball bc I love smart, he’s a warrior all balls and grit and a tough SOB and I’d rather be in the trenches with him than lonzo. Lonzos value to teams around the league is still higher than smarts ( even if I disagree )- just more upside and still on a cost controlled contract for 2 more years.

Who cares what the rest of the league thinks? It's only Griffin and the Pelicans that matter. Who do they want between those two? As far as I know from his time on NBATV, Griffin loves Marcus Smart. Only advantage of Ball is his contract. And if you want to build an competitive team from the get-go (which is what Griffin is trying to do), you take Smart over Ball 11 times out of 10.


Ok so let’s get to the real argument then I’d love your opinion - we get AD without Tatum?

If Lakers don't find a third team, then yes.
User avatar
canman1971
Senior Mod - Celtics
Senior Mod - Celtics
Posts: 14,962
And1: 9,011
Joined: May 13, 2003
Location: 18 Championship BLVD
       

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1444 » by canman1971 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:25 am

Edug27 wrote:
canman1971 wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
This hasn’t nothing to do with me. I’m not making the deals. It’s been reported that Kuz is the most coveted asset here.

Oh I forgot, since it was reported it must be true. What the hell is happening to this board?


My bad. I forgot usual board etiquette.... only if it’s in our favor it’s true.. got it

That makes no sense to what I was saying in any way. But please continue your narrative.
User avatar
klemen4
Head Coach
Posts: 7,327
And1: 1,927
Joined: Feb 27, 2005

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1445 » by klemen4 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:25 am

CelticFaninLBC wrote:Brown, Smart, William's, 14, 20, 22 and MEM pick is quite a haul.

Better than supposed Lal offer no doubt.
“The only important statistic is the final score.” — Bill Russell
The Corey's
RealGM
Posts: 12,787
And1: 8,572
Joined: Jan 29, 2006

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1446 » by The Corey's » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:27 am

canman1971 wrote:
The Corey's wrote:
canman1971 wrote:Just to be clear you have no clue what I’m fine with. What I will say is Ainge knows so much more than both you and me. Only one of us can’t grasp that and lives in a vacuum.



You ae being really abrasive for no reason. I legit asked you a question because you've already pulled the "you dont know what I think" card and you wont even just go on record if the scenario I laid out was fine by you.

It's a good tactic. We wouldnt want to be held accountable for the things wete actually thinking or anything.

Well I guess I have to spell it out for you. Obviously I trust Ainge much more than what I think and certainly what you think and just about anyone on a message board. Doesn’t mean he’s perfect and won’t swing and miss. But he’s a freaking professional with a staff he works with. His track record deserves a little more respect than the minions who on one hand want Kyrie out of town, and on the other critique Ainge for losing him. Yes ideally you would like to get something in return. I’ve said that. But Kyrie is a FA and controls he own destiny.


I have zero issues with the Irving trade. I thought it was amazing and WORTH the risk.

But what we couldnt do in the tei years we had him I dont feel at all comfortable we will be able to do that with Davis. So I want the compensation for Davis to reflect those risk.

Not a any means necessary tactic. Not that I believe he would.
MagicBagley18
RealGM
Posts: 14,831
And1: 20,333
Joined: Feb 15, 2019
   

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1447 » by MagicBagley18 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:27 am

zoyathedestroya wrote:
MagicBagley18 wrote:
zoyathedestroya wrote:Who cares what the rest of the league thinks? It's only Griffin and the Pelicans that matter. Who do they want between those two? As far as I know from his time on NBATV, Griffin loves Marcus Smart. Only advantage of Ball is his contract. And if you want to build an competitive team from the get-go (which is what Griffin is trying to do), you take Smart over Ball 11 times out of 10.


Ok so let’s get to the real argument then I’d love your opinion - we get AD without Tatum?

If Lakers don't find a third team, then yes.


That’s part of my point of what I originally said the lakers package has lonzo and 4 which can be sent to a 3rd teams there’s more avenues to get what the pels desire.
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,423
And1: 23,553
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1448 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:27 am

Slartibartfast wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
GoCeltics123 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Settle. Wow. :lol:


It's really not that crazy. Think about what we gave up for Kyrie. A lower level all-star, a rock solid 3D wing on a bargain deal, an unprotected BK pick and Zizic.

Tatum roughly = BK pick in value, ditto IT and Mem. Smart = Crowder, Williams = Zizic.

And AD even with one less year is a bigger catch than Kyrie.


It actually is.

Bigger catch or not, 2 years is still two years. That would be an awful trade. If you wanna compare, compare DeRozan, Poetl and some trash 1st rounder for Kawhi. That's where Davis' value should stand in my book.

To me it's either Brown + Smart and 14 or Tatum, Smart and 20+22. Giving away Tatum, Smart and Mem pick + 2 first rounders is a **** joke. Specially for a guy that just had his agent nuke his value even further 2 days ago. No thanks.
WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎ THANK YOU TRUTH!
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,160
And1: 3,258
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1449 » by CelticFaninLBC » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:28 am

jfs1000d wrote:Lets Rank assets.

1. Tatum
2. Brown
3. Kuzma
4. Ingram
5. Smart
6. Ball

picks

This comes down to how much do the Pels value players. Do they rank Kuzma more than Brown. Or, are Tatum and Brwn 1 and 2?

I guess this will determine what LA decides.


If NO wants to win, they take Brown, Smart, etc. If they want to tank, Kuz and Ingram are great tank commaders.

Tatum
Brown
#4
Smart
Lonzo
MEM pick
Ingram
Kuzma
14
Williams
20
22
Hart
Feed Your Head
RealGM
Posts: 25,438
And1: 69,469
Joined: Jun 25, 2006
       

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1450 » by Feed Your Head » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:28 am

Edug27 wrote:
canman1971 wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
This hasn’t nothing to do with me. I’m not making the deals. It’s been reported that Kuz is the most coveted asset here.

Oh I forgot, since it was reported it must be true. What the hell is happening to this board?


My bad. I forgot usual board etiquette.... only if it’s in our favor it’s true.. got it


Kuzma was the asset they covet the most from the Lakers, not in general.
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 41,125
And1: 98,277
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1451 » by zoyathedestroya » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:28 am

MagicBagley18 wrote:
zoyathedestroya wrote:
MagicBagley18 wrote:
Ok so let’s get to the real argument then I’d love your opinion - we get AD without Tatum?

If Lakers don't find a third team, then yes.


That’s part of my point of what I originally said the lakers package has lonzo and 4 which can be sent to a 3rd teams there’s more avenues to get what the pels desire.

That's my concession.
If Lakers can get Beal, we don't beat that even with Tatum.
User avatar
canman1971
Senior Mod - Celtics
Senior Mod - Celtics
Posts: 14,962
And1: 9,011
Joined: May 13, 2003
Location: 18 Championship BLVD
       

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1452 » by canman1971 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:30 am

The Comedian wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
canman1971 wrote:Oh I forgot, since it was reported it must be true. What the hell is happening to this board?


My bad. I forgot usual board etiquette.... only if it’s in our favor it’s true.. got it


Kuzma was the asset they covet the most from the Lakers, not in general.

We really don’t know if NO covers that what I feel is a JAG. But time will tell.
MagicBagley18
RealGM
Posts: 14,831
And1: 20,333
Joined: Feb 15, 2019
   

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1453 » by MagicBagley18 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:30 am

Kuzma being the coveted asset is a bs story there’s no weight to it don’t fall for the okie doke....
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,423
And1: 23,553
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1454 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:30 am

Slartibartfast wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
jfs1000d wrote:

exactly.

Brown
Smart
Memphis :wink:
2 firsts


That's a haul for AD. Brown is a rising 15 ppg scorer. Smart all nba defensive guard and the memphis pick. Three firsts including one possible lottery pick?


Wouldn't even put the Memphis pick if I'm giving Brown and Smart.

Kawhi Leonard got San Antonio less than that. This situation should be no different.


The Spurs valued DeRozan as a legit all-star. Foolishly so. And the league has seen how one sided that deal was.


They asked for Siakam and Toronto said no. Boston should do the same.
WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎ THANK YOU TRUTH!
User avatar
The_Ghost_of_JB
RealGM
Posts: 22,604
And1: 18,689
Joined: Mar 04, 2010
Location: In a van down by the river.
   

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1455 » by The_Ghost_of_JB » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:30 am

I'd give up brown and Tatum if Irving was going to stay. But Aingr can't give these guys up with no Irving because Davis is just going to walk.
*Insert witty signature here.*
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1456 » by SmartWentCrazy » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:32 am

The Irving story was probably planted for a reason, FWIW— were not giving up Tatum and were not budging. If that means no AD, no big deal.
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,423
And1: 23,553
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1457 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:35 am

The_Ghost_of_JB wrote:I'd give up brown and Tatum if Irving was going to stay. But Ange can't keep up with these guys with no Irving because Davis is just going to walk.


Exactly. If Irving stayed you have Horford, Irving, Smart and Hayward to recover some assets if Davis bounces. You lose Irving, trade Tatum, Smart, Williams, Mem and 2 firsts what the hell are you left with after? Horford, an expiring Hayward that could or could not return to all star form and Brown about to get paid.

Boston has to be smart about this ****.
WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎ THANK YOU TRUTH!
jfs1000d
RealGM
Posts: 28,089
And1: 14,938
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1458 » by jfs1000d » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:40 am

MagicBagley18 wrote:Kuzma being the coveted asset is a bs story there’s no weight to it don’t fall for the okie doke....


Read the story. Kuzma is the Lakers' best asset. Said nothing of what they compare to Boston's Tatum and Brown. They dont consider Kuzma the best asset overall to be had. Point of the story is to say the pels dont value No. 4 that high.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1459 » by Slartibartfast » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:42 am

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
Wouldn't even put the Memphis pick if I'm giving Brown and Smart.

Kawhi Leonard got San Antonio less than that. This situation should be no different.


The Spurs valued DeRozan as a legit all-star. Foolishly so. And the league has seen how one sided that deal was.


They asked for Siakam and Toronto said no. Boston should do the same.


Siakam was a bench player who just made a huge leap. Similar to us refusing Rondo in the KG trade. Easier to be stubborn with the minor assets.

The headliners are what matter. Toronto had one with DeRozan. We have one with Tatum as a consensus up and coming star (Brown justly or unjustly doesn't have that rep)

Without Tatum our platter is no sexier than LA's.
MagicBagley18
RealGM
Posts: 14,831
And1: 20,333
Joined: Feb 15, 2019
   

Re: Anthony Davis Trade Thread Shimmies to #8 

Post#1460 » by MagicBagley18 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:44 am

jfs1000d wrote:
MagicBagley18 wrote:Kuzma being the coveted asset is a bs story there’s no weight to it don’t fall for the okie doke....


Read the story. Kuzma is the Lakers' best asset. Said nothing of what they compare to Boston's Tatum and Brown. They dont consider Kuzma the best asset overall to be had. Point of the story is to say the pels dont value No. 4 that high.


I don’t need to read the story....I have read it. It’s bs. They don’t view kuzma as the best asset Lakers have. And Tania and Broderick turner who wrote the story and suggested that the lakers could keep 4 if they throw in kuzma are completly out of their minds.

Return to Boston Celtics