Percentsign wrote:everdiso wrote:Percentsign wrote:Source?
Everything I heard indicates that this Finals had the lowest ratings in a while (for U.S. audience):
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/nba-finals-close-strong-tv-ratings-thursday-june-13-2019-1218363
Through five games, the Finals averaged 14.33 million viewers, down 18 percent year to year — due in part to the Raptors playing in Canada, whose audience isn't measured by Nielsen. The series has been setting ratings records for NBA games in that country.
https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/254210/2019-NBA-Finals-Ratings-Up-From-2017-2018
*sigh*
A 6-game NBA Finals will always outdraw a 4-game sweep or a 5-game series (which is what we got in 2018 & 2017). The extra games is the only reason it averaged an overall higher series rating.
FYI:
https://awfulannouncing.com/ratings/nba-finals-game-6-posts-a-13-2-overnight-rating-down-from-game-5-and-middle-of-the-pack-relative-to-previous-game-6-ratings.html
Thursday’s Raptors-Warriors NBA Finals Game 6 earned a 13.2 overnight rating on ABC, down 6% from 2016 (14.1) and down 17% from 2015 (15.9), both of which were Warriors-Cavaliers matchups. There were no comparable games last year or in 2017.
The 13.2 is the lowest for a Game 6 in the NBA Finals since Celtics-Lakers in 2010 (12.3), but overall ranks a middle-of-the-road fifth out of the last ten (dating back to 2000). It trails the two Warriors-Cavaliers games, Spurs-Heat in 2013 (14.7) and Mavericks-Heat in 2011 (15.0).
The flaw with this analysis is that fewer higher rated games are better. I am not sure that is true. And if it is not true, then that's the clearest argument against super teams. And from the NBAs perspective, it's not necessarily a loss to have a much stronger foundation in Canada.