ImageImageImage

Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019

Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman

MagicBagley18
RealGM
Posts: 14,831
And1: 20,332
Joined: Feb 15, 2019
   

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1861 » by MagicBagley18 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 3:52 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:Dlo is like Kyrie except hes significantly worse at basketball


Haha that’s right.....it’s funny to see certain people here push for DLO also. Some that are so against kyrie and how he plays yet wanna bring in DLO
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,732
And1: 8,204
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1862 » by Edug27 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 3:53 pm

CSL_1904 wrote:Tank! Please. The sooner we accept that's the only way to go, the better.


Don’t think we need to tank. We already have two top 3 picks on the roster. Personally, I think we bring Rozier and Horford back. Place an emphasis on developing Tatum, Jaylen and Williams. And allow Gordon to keep getting better... and just see where that takes us. We still have the Grizz pick. And if dudes like Jaylen and Rozier improve, we have better trade assets as well if any opportunity shall arise.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1863 » by SmartWentCrazy » Sat Jun 15, 2019 3:57 pm

Edug27 wrote:
CSL_1904 wrote:Tank! Please. The sooner we accept that's the only way to go, the better.


Don’t think we need to tank. We already have two top 3 picks on the roster. Personally, I think we bring Rozier and Horford back. Place an emphasis on developing Tatum, Jaylen and Williams. And allow Gordon to keep getting better... and just see where that takes us. We still have the Grizz pick. And if dudes like Jaylen and Rozier improve, we have better trade assets as well.


This is where I’m at too— I think most people think we finish with a better record next year [I mean, Vegas has us at 48.5 with the heavy expectation we lose Kyrie as BKN is at 50.5]. That means its pretty likely the trade values for Jaylen and Jayson go up pretty significantly.

The best move it to just hold serve for a year or two and build up for the next big piece that'll hit the market that hopefully will be more open to coming here. Losing Kyrie sets us back a year or two, but its not a reason to take a dumb risk that will incredibly likely [95%+] set us back another 5.
Scarletfire81
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,005
And1: 4,423
Joined: Jul 17, 2014
       

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1864 » by Scarletfire81 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:01 pm

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.masslive.com/celtics/2019/06/boston-celtics-owner-id-rather-go-for-it-than-be-mediocre-for-the-next-10-or-15-years.html%3foutputType=amp


Do you know what's ironic about this statement, the Celtics haven't been championship contenders since 2010, if AD doesn't work out they may not be for another couple years at least. That's 10-15 years of being mediocre.
winsomme2
Pro Prospect
Posts: 951
And1: 517
Joined: Jun 12, 2013

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1865 » by winsomme2 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:02 pm

Edug27 wrote:
CSL_1904 wrote:Tank! Please. The sooner we accept that's the only way to go, the better.


Don’t think we need to tank. We already have two top 3 picks on the roster. Personally, I think we bring Rozier and Horford back. Place an emphasis on developing Tatum, Jaylen and Williams. And allow Gordon to keep getting better... and just see where that takes us. We still have the Grizz pick. And if dudes like Jaylen and Rozier improve, we have better trade assets as well if any opportunity shall arise.



One problem I think was under reported last year is that Hayward, Tatum, and Brown all need to start and they are not a good mixture all playing at the same time.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1866 » by SmartWentCrazy » Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:07 pm

winsomme2 wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
CSL_1904 wrote:Tank! Please. The sooner we accept that's the only way to go, the better.


Don’t think we need to tank. We already have two top 3 picks on the roster. Personally, I think we bring Rozier and Horford back. Place an emphasis on developing Tatum, Jaylen and Williams. And allow Gordon to keep getting better... and just see where that takes us. We still have the Grizz pick. And if dudes like Jaylen and Rozier improve, we have better trade assets as well if any opportunity shall arise.



One problem I think was under reported last year is that Hayward, Tatum, and Brown all need to start and they are not a good mixture all playing at the same time.


Swapping Smart, who doesnt need to shoot much, for Kyrie, who needs 18+ shots a game, should really help alleviate this situation.
Jaqua92
RealGM
Posts: 11,837
And1: 7,398
Joined: Feb 21, 2017
 

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1867 » by Jaqua92 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:10 pm

winsomme2 wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
CSL_1904 wrote:Tank! Please. The sooner we accept that's the only way to go, the better.


Don’t think we need to tank. We already have two top 3 picks on the roster. Personally, I think we bring Rozier and Horford back. Place an emphasis on developing Tatum, Jaylen and Williams. And allow Gordon to keep getting better... and just see where that takes us. We still have the Grizz pick. And if dudes like Jaylen and Rozier improve, we have better trade assets as well if any opportunity shall arise.



One problem I think was under reported last year is that Hayward, Tatum, and Brown all need to start and they are not a good mixture all playing at the same time.
That's why somebody is getting traded

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Scarletfire81
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,005
And1: 4,423
Joined: Jul 17, 2014
       

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1868 » by Scarletfire81 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:14 pm

Jaqua92 wrote:
winsomme2 wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
Don’t think we need to tank. We already have two top 3 picks on the roster. Personally, I think we bring Rozier and Horford back. Place an emphasis on developing Tatum, Jaylen and Williams. And allow Gordon to keep getting better... and just see where that takes us. We still have the Grizz pick. And if dudes like Jaylen and Rozier improve, we have better trade assets as well if any opportunity shall arise.



One problem I think was under reported last year is that Hayward, Tatum, and Brown all need to start and they are not a good mixture all playing at the same time.
That's why somebody is getting traded

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk


I wonder if the Rockets would do a Brown + fillers for Capela. Celtics then resign Rozier. Rozier Smart Tatum Hayward Horford Capela is a playoff team. Just not a serious contender.


This is assuming we don't get AD.
Jaqua92
RealGM
Posts: 11,837
And1: 7,398
Joined: Feb 21, 2017
 

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1869 » by Jaqua92 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:16 pm

Scarletfire81 wrote:
Jaqua92 wrote:
winsomme2 wrote:

One problem I think was under reported last year is that Hayward, Tatum, and Brown all need to start and they are not a good mixture all playing at the same time.
That's why somebody is getting traded

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk


I wonder if the Rockets would do a Brown + fillers for Capela. Celtics then resign Rozier. Rozier Smart Tatum Hayward Horford Capela is a playoff team. Just not a serious contender.
People will see then that Rozier is just as much an issue as Kyrie was. Rozier will always keep this team from meeting it's potential. He's a delusional kid who thinks he's an elite point guard. He will play for himself and ruin the team on the floor. He needs to go at all costs.that team you mentioned above is a first round exit IF they even make the playoffs. Rozier and one of Brown/Tatum need to be gone

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Scarletfire81
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,005
And1: 4,423
Joined: Jul 17, 2014
       

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1870 » by Scarletfire81 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:21 pm

Jaqua92 wrote:
Scarletfire81 wrote:
Jaqua92 wrote:That's why somebody is getting traded

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk


I wonder if the Rockets would do a Brown + fillers for Capela. Celtics then resign Rozier. Rozier Smart Tatum Hayward Horford Capela is a playoff team. Just not a serious contender.
People will see then that Rozier is just as much an issue as Kyrie was. Rozier will always keep this team from meeting it's potential. He's a delusional kid who thinks he's an elite point guard. He will play for himself and ruin the team on the floor. He needs to go at all costs.that team you mentioned above is a first round exit IF they even make the playoffs. Rozier and one of Brown/Tatum need to be gone

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk


Ainge might not have a choice but to resign him though, if he can't work out a trade for a PG. Conley is too old, DLO isn't coming here, I guess maybe Rondo? But even that seems unlikely.
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,732
And1: 8,204
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1871 » by Edug27 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:27 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
CSL_1904 wrote:Tank! Please. The sooner we accept that's the only way to go, the better.


Don’t think we need to tank. We already have two top 3 picks on the roster. Personally, I think we bring Rozier and Horford back. Place an emphasis on developing Tatum, Jaylen and Williams. And allow Gordon to keep getting better... and just see where that takes us. We still have the Grizz pick. And if dudes like Jaylen and Rozier improve, we have better trade assets as well.


This is where I’m at too— I think most people think we finish with a better record next year [I mean, Vegas has us at 48.5 with the heavy expectation we lose Kyrie as BKN is at 50.5]. That means its pretty likely the trade values for Jaylen and Jayson go up pretty significantly.

The best move it to just hold serve for a year or two and build up for the next big piece that'll hit the market that hopefully will be more open to coming here. Losing Kyrie sets us back a year or two, but its not a reason to take a dumb risk that will incredibly likely [95%+] set us back another 5.


Agree. The Kyrie move was a hit and miss for Ainge. It just didn’t work out. There’s plenty of blame to go around from all sides. Kyries entering his prime and has all the right in the world to play wherever he feels the most comfortable. But at the end, it was a risk worth taking.

But moving Tatum for AD is a different story. KG was tentative with Boston because he was looking for a contender. With AD, it’s personal. He does not want to be a Celtic. Doesn’t need want to be in this city. It’s loud and clear. And the last thing Brad needs is another season with more unhappy players in that locker room.. we already saw how that played out last year.

Develop Tatum. Develop Jaylen. Develop Williams. Let Rozier grow. Let Gordon regain form. If Horford wants out, that’s fine. Allow him to get one last shot at a title. Hold onto Smart. He’ll be a handy trade piece once he’s in the last year of that contract.
User avatar
Edug27
RealGM
Posts: 11,732
And1: 8,204
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1872 » by Edug27 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:28 pm

winsomme2 wrote:
Edug27 wrote:
CSL_1904 wrote:Tank! Please. The sooner we accept that's the only way to go, the better.


Don’t think we need to tank. We already have two top 3 picks on the roster. Personally, I think we bring Rozier and Horford back. Place an emphasis on developing Tatum, Jaylen and Williams. And allow Gordon to keep getting better... and just see where that takes us. We still have the Grizz pick. And if dudes like Jaylen and Rozier improve, we have better trade assets as well if any opportunity shall arise.



One problem I think was under reported last year is that Hayward, Tatum, and Brown all need to start and they are not a good mixture all playing at the same time.


I’d like to see them all together without Kyrie for one more season before determining that.
GregB
RealGM
Posts: 11,903
And1: 2,975
Joined: Sep 21, 2004
Location: South Shore, MA
     

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1873 » by GregB » Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:39 pm

Scarletfire81 wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.masslive.com/celtics/2019/06/boston-celtics-owner-id-rather-go-for-it-than-be-mediocre-for-the-next-10-or-15-years.html%3foutputType=amp


Do you know what's ironic about this statement, the Celtics haven't been championship contenders since 2010, if AD doesn't work out they may not be for another couple years at least. That's 10-15 years of being mediocre.


These comments are a year too late. If they wanted to go all in they should have traded for Kawhi.

Now we give up all our assets for AD and then hope the mental midget resigns with us.

If not we have a top east team for one year before AD leaves us.
djFan71
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,865
And1: 17,221
Joined: Jul 24, 2010
 

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1874 » by djFan71 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 5:15 pm

My fear now for the fragile S&T Kyrie hopes is that a good path for both teams might be for KD to opt-in and trade to the Nets.

Nets:
1) Keep DLo cap hold which is lower than his max
2) Sign Kyrie to cap space.
3) Trade of opt-in KD for Dinwiddie, Harris and whatever else they agree on as filler and fits under the cap. Only need to match $30ish instead of the $38M if he opted out. After Kyrie cap is around $14M so Din, Harris get them right there. By an opt-in and trade, Nets aren't hard-capped either.

That restocks the Ws around Steph, Green, Iggy, Din, Harris while Klay recovers.
Nets get to run Kyrie, DLo, Prince, Allen, LeVert, Kurucs out while waiting on KD. Just make the playoffs and hope KD is ready to go in May.

Not seeing much room for Boston to get anything for Kyrie there.

Only hope is that some team(s) throw KD a full 4/5 year max offer which he'd be insane to turn down. That negates all of the above. If it's the Nets, than a S&T for Kyrie is back on the table.
nickgammon
Pro Prospect
Posts: 939
And1: 873
Joined: Apr 17, 2014
     

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1875 » by nickgammon » Sat Jun 15, 2019 5:43 pm

If the Celtics want D-Lo, Horford has to take a pay cut of about $14-15 mil from what it looks like. We could also trade Yabu to make room for the rooks.

In regards to D-Lo vs Kyrie, of course Kyrie’s a better basketball player. In terms of fit though, D-Lo would probably be better. The idea going forward is to build around Tatum as the #1 option. Kyrie obviously isn’t going to subscribe to that as he feels he’s the #1 option, but D-Lo would likely relish the opportunity to play alongside Tatum and Brown.

Brad Stevens has had great success with point guards far less talented than D-Lo. The Celtics also have the complementary defenders to help D-Lo on that end. If he’s on the team, you can always look forward to the early 2020s when Al and Gordon are off the books and KAT could be the next superstar to hit the block. Might want to play with his buddy DAR and hopefully by then an All-NBA player in Tatum.
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 13,806
And1: 9,281
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1876 » by chrisab123 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 6:32 pm

CSL_1904 wrote:Tank! Please. The sooner we accept that's the only way to go, the better.


Yeah... Tanking definitely worked for the Hawks this year. I can't wait for the vocabulary of this board to be reintroduced to "tank commander" "hard tank or tank hard" and "soft tank".

Tanking rarely works.
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,958
And1: 8,694
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1877 » by ParticleMan » Sat Jun 15, 2019 6:42 pm

chrisab123 wrote:
CSL_1904 wrote:Tank! Please. The sooner we accept that's the only way to go, the better.


Yeah... Tanking definitely worked for the Hawks this year. I can't wait for the vocabulary of this board to be reintroduced to "tank commander" "hard tank or tank hard" and "soft tank".

Tanking rarely works.


yeah tanking hasn't worked since tim duncan. the people who think this is a viable strategy are the same ones who think the Earth is flat.

oh wait...

Image
cloverleaf
General Manager
Posts: 9,134
And1: 6,377
Joined: Feb 10, 2007

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1878 » by cloverleaf » Sat Jun 15, 2019 7:34 pm

ParticleMan wrote:
chrisab123 wrote:
CSL_1904 wrote:Tank! Please. The sooner we accept that's the only way to go, the better.


Yeah... Tanking definitely worked for the Hawks this year. I can't wait for the vocabulary of this board to be reintroduced to "tank commander" "hard tank or tank hard" and "soft tank".

Tanking rarely works.


yeah tanking hasn't worked since tim duncan. the people who think this is a viable strategy are the same ones who think the Earth is flat.

oh wait...

Image


Oh, but wait a minute, look what did work for Masai: trading away his "star" in Gay, for little return, in order to let his budding stars mature into their potential:

https://fansided.com/2019/06/13/raptors-title-contenders-2013-trades/
User avatar
zoyathedestroya
RealGM
Posts: 37,346
And1: 89,241
Joined: Nov 05, 2017

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1879 » by zoyathedestroya » Sat Jun 15, 2019 7:38 pm

Read on Twitter

The potential and talent was always there. So sad and frustrating they never got their **** together.
User avatar
Roddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,010
And1: 10,807
Joined: Jun 19, 2010
Location: France
 

Re: Celtics General Offseason (incl. Trade) Thread, 2019 

Post#1880 » by Roddy » Sat Jun 15, 2019 7:43 pm

I need rumors, tweets from random guys, WojBomb/ReloadBomb !!!!!!!!!!!

Image

Return to Boston Celtics