logical_art wrote:clyde21 wrote:logical_art wrote:Bump.
Not sure why this guy is getting mocked as low as he is. He's got excellent size (weight a surprising 237 at the combine and still had elite athletic testing), is one of the most athletic and fluid bigs I've seen, and has had good college production.
Why isn't he viewed as a top half of the first round prospect?
just not a very valuable archetype at this point, more of a 2nd unit C.
Then why is Hayes being mocked in the lottery?
almost 2 years younger, better FT shooter, better finisher, more potential as a roll man, more potential as a spot up guy down the line from the mid-range/baseline area, etc.
but u can certainly make an argument that Hayes doesn't belong in the lotto do to his archetype as well