bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:Rozier Fever: catch it while you can, before you start massaging Hayward's thighs..
Why are we still posting stuff from Robot Dave
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:Rozier Fever: catch it while you can, before you start massaging Hayward's thighs..

The Corey's wrote:Going into a season with rozier over Irving is a fail on a massive lever talent wise.
Forget all the bull. If you're choosing rozier over Irving then I cant even have a real conversation with you
Darthlukey wrote:The Corey's wrote:Going into a season with rozier over Irving is a fail on a massive lever talent wise.
Forget all the bull. If you're choosing rozier over Irving then I cant even have a real conversation with you
Not that I am a Rozier fan, i'm really not. But I dont think its about straight up comparing Rozier to Kyrire on a talent level. It takes into account chemistry and the way the team will interact now that Kyrie is gone.
Cause it's easier to demonize Kyrie and blame him for all of it. It's like people just got out of an abusive relationship with the dude.darylbe wrote:Again, the TEAM got the first seed, and subsequently played the 8th and 4th seed teams because of majority of a season where kyrie was the best player. They wouldn't have been "minutes away from the finals" if it wasn't for kyrie.
How do people seriously miss this
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM mobile app

Jakeopp wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:Rozier Fever: catch it while you can, before you start massaging Hayward's thighs..
Why are we still posting stuff from Robot Dave![]()
![]()
Floody100 wrote:Anyone know what we’re going to do starting/bench wise ?
Do we start Brown/Tatum & have Smart/Hayward come off the bench ?
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
Celtics_Champs wrote:Jakeopp wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:Rozier Fever: catch it while you can, before you start massaging Hayward's thighs..
Why are we still posting stuff from Robot Dave![]()
![]()
Mind catching me up on who this robot guy is? Any credibility?

StojkoVrankovic wrote:GregB wrote:StojkoVrankovic wrote:Nope
I would assume the Lakers already made Rondo an offer
They have to rescind him if they want to max someone else out. Best they could offer would be the room exception. If we don’t go under the cap we will have Full MLE to offer.
I am clearly just assuming they told him to hold tight until they wrap some things up. Rondo isn't playing for paydays anymore, he takes what he can get
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Redemption. Water into wine....rondo is Jesus
Ed Pinkney wrote:Randle would possibly make sense next to a floor spacing 5 like Horford, but if you plan on starting him then what do you do with Tatum, Hayward and Brown and the starting five?
Floody100 wrote:Anyone know what we’re going to do starting/bench wise ?
Do we start Brown/Tatum & have Smart/Hayward come off the bench ?
darylbe wrote:Again, the TEAM got the first seed, and subsequently played the 8th and 4th seed teams because of majority of a season where kyrie was the best player. They wouldn't have been "minutes away from the finals" if it wasn't for kyrie.
How do people seriously miss this
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM mobile app
Triple7 wrote:Ed Pinkney wrote:Randle would possibly make sense next to a floor spacing 5 like Horford, but if you plan on starting him then what do you do with Tatum, Hayward and Brown and the starting five?
How about Vucevic? I think he’s a much better fit with horford than Randle and Capela. He’s good offensively and not that awful defensively.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
GregB wrote:bucknersrevenge wrote:
Am I weird that for some reason I've always liked the idea of putting him next to Tatum, Brown and Smart? He can't play D worth a damn but he rebounds, He's athletic. He can run a break and pass. Starting to shoot it a little. This guy's been a guilty pleasure for a couple of years now and I wish I could quit him.
Nah I am with you. Would rather have him than Morris. He would certainly give us some toughness in the paint on offense. Something this team could use dearly.