CeltsfaninDC wrote:things would have to collapse fairly significantly for him to want to leave MIL.
Not necessarily. Look at LeBron and Durant.
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
CeltsfaninDC wrote:things would have to collapse fairly significantly for him to want to leave MIL.
djFan71 wrote:bucknersrevenge wrote:To me, Smart earned the right to remain a starter. His value was so obvious last year throughout the turmoil. And that he did it AFTER he signed the new deal IMO shouldn't be understated. I went to the NBA Draft in 2016 when we drafted him. I knew we were getting a leader and a gamer. With what just happened I just don't see how you tell him to go back to the bench again unless you are getting a player at Kyrie's talent level. His passing is fine enough for primary handling duties but you can expect the Usage to go up a ton for Tatum and Brown anyway so big deal if Smart doesn't look like your traditional lead guard.
So if you have him, the Jay's, Al (if he comes back) where does that leave Hayward. If you put him in the starting lineup, that was the same starting lineup that got its collective ass handed to it to start this last season. Say what you want about Kyrie but he's not responsible for everything. So what's the solution? You have to put our 30M golden boy back on the bench to be a 6th man.
Considering he will still have to prove he's back to himself, from a talent standpoint, it makes sense. But it's getting almost comicial to think we'll have spent $120M on a 6th man. But that's what he'll be. Start Baynes. Let Hayward run the bench crew. No Rozier. Find a new backup PG to play with him, Semi, TimeLord and our draft picks.
I think this is the best we can hope for.
Agree completley on Gordon as 6th man, hopefully Manu style.
I wonder where Smart's head is at with the Kyrie thing. He was Kyrie's most ardent supporter, and playing with Kyrie allowed Smart's game to flourish. Without Kyrie, does Smart try to take on too much offensive responsibility and play beyond his limitations? He has in previous seasons when there were no other options. But, with this team next year, I don't think that's needed.
I'm especially wondering what happens if we bring back Terry and start him. I think Smart handles it fine regardless, but I'm leaning more and more to not keeping both past the deadline. It doesn't make sense to have $24M+ tied up in 2 combo/point guards that you don't have enough minutes to play without going super small since the core of your team is 3 wings needing 30+ minutes each.
Celts17Pride wrote:Giannis will probably be in line for a supermax with Milwaukee. Doubt that he leaves.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
Darth Celtic wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Lakers only need 8 players in the playoffs. If they're smart, they'll use the remaining cap space on two or three high-level role players instead of a max-type guy. Apart from ring-chasing vets who might settle for the minimum, there's always the buyout market. You can luck out with a serviceable veteran that's being benched on a rebuilding team.
One injury to Lebron or AD might book their ticket to lotteryville though. Look at what just happened to the Warriors. You still need depth behind those superstars.
6M for JJ Redick on 2 year deal.
7m for D rose on 2 year deal
6m for Seth Curry on 2 year deal
5 m for Robin Lopez on 1 year deal
vet min for J. Crawford
vet min for C. Anthony
vet min for wilson chandler
I mean, it can be done.
Rose/Crawford
Reddick/Curry
James/Chandler
Anthony/Kuzma
AD/Lopez
Rest of the roster
Team has a 2 year window.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
jmr07019 wrote:CeltsfaninDC wrote:things would have to collapse fairly significantly for him to want to leave MIL.
Not necessarily. Look at LeBron and Durant.
bucknersrevenge wrote:djFan71 wrote:bucknersrevenge wrote:To me, Smart earned the right to remain a starter. His value was so obvious last year throughout the turmoil. And that he did it AFTER he signed the new deal IMO shouldn't be understated. I went to the NBA Draft in 2016 when we drafted him. I knew we were getting a leader and a gamer. With what just happened I just don't see how you tell him to go back to the bench again unless you are getting a player at Kyrie's talent level. His passing is fine enough for primary handling duties but you can expect the Usage to go up a ton for Tatum and Brown anyway so big deal if Smart doesn't look like your traditional lead guard.
So if you have him, the Jay's, Al (if he comes back) where does that leave Hayward. If you put him in the starting lineup, that was the same starting lineup that got its collective ass handed to it to start this last season. Say what you want about Kyrie but he's not responsible for everything. So what's the solution? You have to put our 30M golden boy back on the bench to be a 6th man.
Considering he will still have to prove he's back to himself, from a talent standpoint, it makes sense. But it's getting almost comicial to think we'll have spent $120M on a 6th man. But that's what he'll be. Start Baynes. Let Hayward run the bench crew. No Rozier. Find a new backup PG to play with him, Semi, TimeLord and our draft picks.
I think this is the best we can hope for.
Agree completley on Gordon as 6th man, hopefully Manu style.
I wonder where Smart's head is at with the Kyrie thing. He was Kyrie's most ardent supporter, and playing with Kyrie allowed Smart's game to flourish. Without Kyrie, does Smart try to take on too much offensive responsibility and play beyond his limitations? He has in previous seasons when there were no other options. But, with this team next year, I don't think that's needed.
I'm especially wondering what happens if we bring back Terry and start him. I think Smart handles it fine regardless, but I'm leaning more and more to not keeping both past the deadline. It doesn't make sense to have $24M+ tied up in 2 combo/point guards that you don't have enough minutes to play without going super small since the core of your team is 3 wings needing 30+ minutes each.
Agreed. I forget who proposed it (I think it was Celts17Pride) but if Washington finally decides to bail on Beal, having Rozier starting and being showcased would come in handy with a more conducive salary number.
CeltsfaninDC wrote:jmr07019 wrote:CeltsfaninDC wrote:things would have to collapse fairly significantly for him to want to leave MIL.
Not necessarily. Look at LeBron and Durant.
OMG he is nothing like those two. He’s made many statements that he wants to stay. DOn’t get your hopes up on him going anywhere
return2glory wrote:Giannis is not from the United States where it’s becoming more of a Ima do me aka me me me society.
I expect Giannis to resign with the Bucks.
MagicBagley18 wrote:bucknersrevenge wrote:djFan71 wrote:Agree completley on Gordon as 6th man, hopefully Manu style.
I wonder where Smart's head is at with the Kyrie thing. He was Kyrie's most ardent supporter, and playing with Kyrie allowed Smart's game to flourish. Without Kyrie, does Smart try to take on too much offensive responsibility and play beyond his limitations? He has in previous seasons when there were no other options. But, with this team next year, I don't think that's needed.
I'm especially wondering what happens if we bring back Terry and start him. I think Smart handles it fine regardless, but I'm leaning more and more to not keeping both past the deadline. It doesn't make sense to have $24M+ tied up in 2 combo/point guards that you don't have enough minutes to play without going super small since the core of your team is 3 wings needing 30+ minutes each.
Agreed. I forget who proposed it (I think it was Celts17Pride) but if Washington finally decides to bail on Beal, having Rozier starting and being showcased would come in handy with a more conducive salary number.
Beal would be great but I’m not sure if he becomes available and knowing the pelicans had interest we would be able to beat them out in a deal with brown as the centerpiece and I’m sure other teams have cases to be made as well.
He would be a great get tho. I’d be all for it but if we ain’t including Tatum do we still have the assets to get him?
Darth Celtic wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Lakers only need 8 players in the playoffs. If they're smart, they'll use the remaining cap space on two or three high-level role players instead of a max-type guy. Apart from ring-chasing vets who might settle for the minimum, there's always the buyout market. You can luck out with a serviceable veteran that's being benched on a rebuilding team.
One injury to Lebron or AD might book their ticket to lotteryville though. Look at what just happened to the Warriors. You still need depth behind those superstars.
6M for JJ Redick on 2 year deal.
7m for D rose on 2 year deal
6m for Seth Curry on 2 year deal
5 m for Robin Lopez on 1 year deal
vet min for J. Crawford
vet min for C. Anthony
vet min for wilson chandler
I mean, it can be done.
Rose/Crawford
Reddick/Curry
James/Chandler
Anthony/Kuzma
AD/Lopez
Rest of the roster
Team has a 2 year window.