dakomish23 wrote:Are We Ther Yet wrote:dakomish23 wrote:
Why is Vonleh still under contract for 20-21 in this scenario?
Joakim Noah?
Ugh![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks
dakomish23 wrote:Are We Ther Yet wrote:dakomish23 wrote:
Why is Vonleh still under contract for 20-21 in this scenario?
Joakim Noah?
Ugh![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

Are We Ther Yet wrote:dakomish23 wrote:Are We Ther Yet wrote:
Joakim Noah?
Ugh![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor

K-DOT wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:I see people falling into the trap of:
"THIS IS THE BIG FA YEAR! IF THE KNICKS DON'T SPEND IT NOW, ALL THE FUTURE FA YEARS SUCK"
This is the mentality that led to maxing out Alan Houston with no competition. That had the Knicks decide Eddy Curry was "worth it". Throwing cash as undeserving guys like Eisely, Anderson, Jeffries, Big Snacks. Trading for Bargs because "THE TEAM HAS TO WIN NOW WITH MELO!!!" Trading all the young guys for Melo because the "HE MIGHT SIGN WITH THE NETS!!!". Yes, I know they'd have to have gotten rid of guys to fit him in. Fine, they could have traded them.
I'm not going to rehash the entire, roughly 16 year sordid history of the Knicks feeling they "have to make moves" and perhaps the sorts of people within the fanbase that works for.
F*ck that approach.
Nothing good in FA? Save the money. Keep rolling it over. I could personally give a f*ck if they don't spend it for 5 years.
That's a bit extreme, but I know the extreme alternative hasn't worked for 16 years.
Is there a place where some signings could happen - some iterative steps, but maintain a max slot after? Sure. But those have to be done VERY carefully.
Yeah, I see people using this as a reason to overpay for guys like Randle or DLo, or still give KD with one leg 40 mil a year
I guarantee you, if you go back 2 years and look at the consensus of the board, none of us would think we'd be in a position to sign KD and either Kyrie or Kawhi, or really anyone now. But then, this year, we start getting linked to guys and stuff. Obviously it hasn't happened yet and might not happen, but that's no reason to panic spend
That's why we went out and overpaid for THJ, cause we didn't think we'd have a use for that money. I'll admit, I had that mindset too with him, but as we all know, that turned into a mistake
I think it's fair to say DLo is comparable to THJ, not because they're similar talent levels, but because you're essentially overpaying a guy for 1 good year and assuming he's gonna continue to improve cause he's young. While DLo is better than Tim was, we'd also be paying him significantly more, and if he never improves, he's gonna end up another deadweight contract. And just cause right now we don't see anyone we'd spend that money on regardless doesn't mean they won't be there in the future
You never know what's gonna happen, so you should always retain flexibility is my position

DaT WaVeY RiCaN wrote:How can Max Kellerman consider himself a New Yorker and continuously say that the Nets fanbase can take over New York.
I really cant tell if hes dead serious or trying to stick with his gimmick lol

god shammgod wrote:i feel like a lot of you love russel because he plays locally and you see him a lot. if you listed the best players 25 and under he's not top 20.
snadler wrote:Bondy-The Knicks are not expected to be in the mix for Russell or Harris. New York still believes it’s in the hunt for Kawhi Leonard, Irving and Durant. But, according to a source, the Knicks will punt their $70 million-plus in cap space if they can’t land one of those Tier A free agents. In other words, they’ll use the money to lock in one-year deals and do this all over again in 2020 when Anthony Davis, DeMar DeRozan, Draymond Green, Ben Simmons (restricted) and Pascal Siakam (restricted) hit the market.

god shammgod wrote:i feel like a lot of you love russel because he plays locally and you see him a lot. if you listed the best players 25 and under he's not top 20.
Homegrown homers didn't want AD, no chance they want to trade the amazing eventual cap casualities DSJ, Knox and Frank for a disgruntled studthebuzzardman wrote:I also can't believe how easily people forget that cap space represents something other than a spot for FA's to occupy.
How soon people forget.
Don't worry, if the Knicks max out sub max cat guys and later people bitch about how the Knicks couldn't get in on certain trades when stud players became available, I'll be sure to remind you. Often.
drekwins wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
Thanks for spelling that out, I always forget who is potentially due, when.
Let's keep in mind that cap space isn't only for FA. The amount of space a team is under the cap facilitates other moves, whether being able to conduct lobsided trades (still under the cap post trade) or being able to absorb some star player into a max slot. Or even being close to a max slot, but having a player or two easily shed.
yeah. no long-term salary commitments to the unworthy while we're still on a rebuild timeline.
we have another season of control even after this one for the 2017 draftees. so having cap space allows you to be ready to capitalize on all kinds of opportunities.
not loving 2020 FA class though. so we have another impasse even if we love these guys. their cap holds come into play a la KP in 2021 FA.
Cap holds do become an issue eventually. This is one of the main reasons why I only really love Mitch, RJ and Dotson on our roster. They're all either rookie deals or very reasonable. As far as DSJ, Knox and Frank... they're going to be salary cap casualties unless they really show something major. Even so, it'll probably only help to increase their values so we could trade them to another team.
