PrinceV wrote:Boston won't win if Ainge thinks Tatum is untouchable.
He's going to have an excellent statistical year this year if he's handed the reigns tho
Moderators: bwgood77, Domejandro
PrinceV wrote:Boston won't win if Ainge thinks Tatum is untouchable.
Kimiko wrote:This is why Masai Ujiri is the Executive of the year. He had the cohones to make the deal and live whatever was the result was.
the_process wrote:mickie wrote:LAKESHOW wrote:Was giving up Derozan really a big risk? Child pleeeze.
The risk you guys are missing is that Masai put all his chips on the table and went for it. If this didnt work out, he's out that door. Maybe you LA folks should think outside of the box sometimes.
He wasn’t getting fired. He would’ve gone to ownership and said “we were topped out, we went for it, it didn’t work out, let’s retool.”
hype_2004 wrote:nikster wrote:the_process wrote:
It was an easy choice for Masai. Granted, it paid off in spades; but there was little risk involved.
Yeah it’s not fair to compare them. Raptors only had 2 years of DeRozan, a flawed all star who was commanding near max and who’s teams could never make it come the hump. Giving up Tatum, Simmons or Embiid are much bigger risks
They say fortune favors the brave....damn how big is Ujiris balls?! Too big to measure, lol!
nikster wrote:hype_2004 wrote:nikster wrote:Yeah it’s not fair to compare them. Raptors only had 2 years of DeRozan, a flawed all star who was commanding near max and who’s teams could never make it come the hump. Giving up Tatum, Simmons or Embiid are much bigger risks
They say fortune favors the brave....damn how big is Ujiris balls?! Too big to measure, lol!
Again it wasn’t a big risk in Ujiris part
nitocobola wrote:nikster wrote:hype_2004 wrote:
They say fortune favors the brave....damn how big is Ujiris balls?! Too big to measure, lol!
Again it wasn’t a big risk in Ujiris part
YEP,I don't know why people don't get this. I don't think that the sixers could have got kawhi without involving simmons in the trade.. You just don't trade a 22 year old all-star that you can control during 7/8 years for a player that could leave next year.
Trading de rozan was an easy choice for the raps, it paid off.. props to them.
the_process wrote:mickie wrote:LAKESHOW wrote:Was giving up Derozan really a big risk? Child pleeeze.
The risk you guys are missing is that Masai put all his chips on the table and went for it. If this didnt work out, he's out that door. Maybe you LA folks should think outside of the box sometimes.
He wasn’t getting fired. He would’ve gone to ownership and said “we were topped out, we went for it, it didn’t work out, let’s retool.”
mickie wrote:the_process wrote:mickie wrote:
The risk you guys are missing is that Masai put all his chips on the table and went for it. If this didnt work out, he's out that door. Maybe you LA folks should think outside of the box sometimes.
He wasn’t getting fired. He would’ve gone to ownership and said “we were topped out, we went for it, it didn’t work out, let’s retool.”
Then you prolly dont know the Raptors ownership is like. They love DeMar here in Toronto and the amount of fans crucifying Masai when this trade happened. If Kawhi didnt play like he did and the bombed out in the playoffs it'll be a full rebuild without Masai. Masai convinced them to get rid off the COTY and trade the only "star" who pledged his allegiance to the city and replaced him with a player who no one knows the severity of his injury and expect Maple Leafs Entertainment to just take it without firing anyone? Lol. Ok.
spree2kawhi wrote:People never realized that Masai set the Raptors up for an instant rebuild if Kawhi decides to leave. It was a trade without any risk, at least a salary dump for a middling Raptors team that turned into a championship.
Kimiko wrote:This is why Masai Ujiri is the Executive of the year. He had the cohones to make the deal and live whatever was the result was.
firelogic wrote:Kimiko wrote:This is why Masai Ujiri is the Executive of the year. He had the cohones to make the deal and live whatever was the result was.
People keep saying that it was a gamble/high-risk move and I don't get it at all. What risk? What gamble? Even if Kawhi didn't play a single game as a Raptor due to his injury, all the Raptors "lost" was 2 seasons of Derozan to which I say, "who cares?" He wasn't going to take the team anywhere and the team certainly wasn't going to get a better return than Kawhi. It was win/win for the organization as far as I'm concerned.
Kawhi is healthy and the team contends for a championship.
Kawhi has regressed and the rebuild starts a year early.
mickie wrote:firelogic wrote:Kimiko wrote:This is why Masai Ujiri is the Executive of the year. He had the cohones to make the deal and live whatever was the result was.
People keep saying that it was a gamble/high-risk move and I don't get it at all. What risk? What gamble? Even if Kawhi didn't play a single game as a Raptor due to his injury, all the Raptors "lost" was 2 seasons of Derozan to which I say, "who cares?" He wasn't going to take the team anywhere and the team certainly wasn't going to get a better return than Kawhi. It was win/win for the organization as far as I'm concerned.
Kawhi is healthy and the team contends for a championship.
Kawhi has regressed and the rebuild starts a year early.
if you don't see the gamble/risk here then you have no idea on how to run a "business". if Kawhi trade bombed out and he leaves this summer then yes we lost 2 years of the overpayment on DeMar but the bigger picture is the ticket/merchandise sale. who's gonna bring fans into the stands? No DeMar, no Kawhi? Lowry? There's a reason teams overpay for certain players like DeMar and it's not just about winning. Fans love him even when he choked in the playoffs.
asuran wrote: Spurs were and are happy with the deal. No complaints.