Welcome Ty Jerome!

WeekapaugGroove · Post #61 » by **WeekapaugGroove** » Fri Jun 28, 2019 9:27 pm

I think he'll be one of those dudes that doesn't put up big stats but is the type a coach wants out there because he does a bunch of smart little winning things and won't be afraid to take a big shot.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app

Saberestar · Post #62 » by **Saberestar** » Mon Jul 8, 2019 1:30 am

Read on Twitter

Post #63 » by **lilfishi22** » Mon Jul 8, 2019 2:01 am

Saberestar wrote:

Read on Twitter

Of course he does

suns12345 · Post #64 » by **suns12345** » Mon Jul 8, 2019 2:22 am

lilfishi22 wrote:
Saberestar wrote:

Read on Twitter

Of course he does

Don’t know how you can honestly say that given the numbers Ja Morant put up

Happy to be proven wrong though

Post #65 » by **lilfishi22** » Mon Jul 8, 2019 2:27 am

suns12345 wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:
Saberestar wrote:

Read on Twitter

Of course he does

Don’t know how you can honestly say that given the numbers Ja Morant put up

Happy to be proven wrong though

Typical GM rationalising. But nothing we didn't expect

NTB · Post #66 » by **NTB** » Mon Jul 8, 2019 7:31 am

I think I read Jerome had the best AST/TO ratio last season in college.

Saberestar · Post #67 » by **Saberestar** » Mon Jul 8, 2019 8:46 am

Post #68 » by **lilfishi22** » Mon Jul 8, 2019 11:27 pm

Great to see Ty there!

SlovenianDragon · Post #69 » by **SlovenianDragon** » Tue Jul 9, 2019 7:01 pm

that shot is cleannnn Glad we went for shooters over athletes/project players. Cam and Ty can contribute right away.

Frank Lee · Post #70 » by **Frank Lee** » Thu Jul 11, 2019 11:46 am

He’s a baller
I think he gets minutes... then replaces TJohnson next yr. Or even this yr by the trade deadline. I like TJo, but this kid looks to be a better shooter, an adequate passer ... if he rounds out the rest of his game at least to TJos level... The FO is smiling.

I think both these draft picks were nice insurance policies for the probable departure of TJo and possible exit of Oubre. They pan out, we either have some chunky worthwhile trade chips or cap space. And neither gets thrown into the fire

Post #71 » by **bwgood77** » Thu Jul 11, 2019 3:54 pm

I think Jerome will be a great backup to Rubio and is probably a better pairing with Booker. Booker with his high usage, will have times where he dominates the ball, because it's in his nature, and Rubio will not be an off ball threat. I'd probably stagger Rubio and Booker some...to where at least one is on the floor at all times, and let Rubio play a lot with the Johnsons, Kaminsky and Oubre.

kennydorglas · Post #72 » by **kennydorglas** » Thu Jul 11, 2019 3:59 pm

Ty will be our Van Vleet.

MathiasPW · Post #73 » by **MathiasPW** » Thu Jul 11, 2019 5:02 pm

bwgood77 wrote:I think Jerome will be a great backup to Rubio and is probably a better pairing with Booker. Booker with his high usage, will have times where he dominates the ball, because it's in his nature, and Rubio will not be an off ball threat. I'd probably stagger Rubio and Booker some...to where at least one is on ball all the time, and let Rubio play a lot with the Johnsons, Kaminsky and Oubre.

Booker sure will need to learn to use a lot of different hats next season.

Post #74 » by **lilfishi22** » Thu Jul 11, 2019 11:36 pm

Have a good feeling Ty will probably the back up 1 by trade deadline because I think we'll move TJ

Post #75 » by **bwgood77** » Thu Jul 11, 2019 11:52 pm

lilfishi22 wrote:Have a good feeling Ty will probably the back up 1 by trade deadline because I think we'll move TJ

Why would we move TJ?

Post #76 » by **lilfishi22** » Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:29 am

bwgood77 wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:Have a good feeling Ty will probably the back up 1 by trade deadline because I think we'll move TJ

Why would we move TJ?

$19m expiring could net a really useful piece

Post #77 » by **bwgood77** » Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:44 am

lilfishi22 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:Have a good feeling Ty will probably the back up 1 by trade deadline because I think we'll move TJ

Why would we move TJ?

$19m expiring could net a really useful piece

Usually used for bad contract dumps along with picks. I don't think we want to take on long term money and I think we like Tyler. But sure, if the Wizards want to dump Beal or something, I'll take it. But we say this every year with expirings and they are usually useless, starting with Monroe's.

Post #78 » by **lilfishi22** » Fri Jul 12, 2019 1:21 am

bwgood77 wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Why would we move TJ?

$19m expiring could net a really useful piece

Usually used for bad contract dumps along with picks. I don't think we want to take on long term money and I think we like Tyler. But sure, if the Wizards want to dump Beal or something, I'll take it. But we say this every year with expirings and they are usually useless, starting with Monroe's.

Depends who's available. I think if there is a long term piece we like that another team is trying to offload then I think we'll do it. Last few seasons has been with McD and he was looking for picks and assets, not necessarily winning pieces. JJ might view it differently. If a guy like....Aaron Gordon for example becomes available

bigfoot · Post #79 » by **bigfoot** » Fri Jul 12, 2019 4:18 am

bwgood77 wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Why would we move TJ?

$19m expiring could net a really useful piece

Usually used for bad contract dumps along with picks. I don't think we want to take on long term money and I think we like Tyler. But sure, if the Wizards want to dump Beal or something, I'll take it. But we say this every year with expirings and they are usually useless, starting with Monroe's.

Yeah, same thing with Chandler and Rivers expiring contracts ... teams would have to send us crappy multi-year contracts and a draft pick to get Tyler and we don't want that. Expiring contracts are mostly overrated unless the team is in the first year of a rebuild (e.g., Grizz or the Nets and Cavs of the past). With Booker and Ayton on board it doesn't make sense.

jcsunsfan · Post #80 » by **jcsunsfan** » Fri Jul 12, 2019 5:39 am

bigfoot wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
lilfishi22 wrote:$19m expiring could net a really useful piece

Usually used for bad contract dumps along with picks. I don't think we want to take on long term money and I think we like Tyler. But sure, if the Wizards want to dump Beal or something, I'll take it. But we say this every year with expirings and they are usually useless, starting with Monroe's.

Yeah, same thing with Chandler and Rivers expiring contracts ... teams would have to send us crappy multi-year contracts and a draft pick to get Tyler and we don't want that. Expiring contracts are mostly overrated unless the team is in the first year of a rebuild (e.g., Grizz or the Nets and Cavs of the past). With Booker and Ayton on board it doesn't make sense.

That contract is really useful in trading for a disgruntled star. It would be TJ, maybe a young player, and pick. Any time a team has to move a star player, that is what they are looking for--an expiring, a young promising young player, and picks.