vincecarter4pres wrote:Just renouncing Ed Davis gets us uber close to a 7 to 9 year max. He doesn't even create another cap hold, because technically you only have to account for 11 cap holds, since it's implied the signing of a free agent removes the 12th so that cap hold amount can be included in said free agents first year base salary.
TheNetsFan wrote:Prokorov wrote:MGrand15 wrote:
That team would be so good. We'd need some solid veteran minimum guys to fill out the bench but damn.
Kyrie/Dinwiddie
LeVert/Harris/Musa
Durant/Prince
Kurucs/Prince
Allen/
Lots of talent there.
Dudley i can see coming back on the minimum. Kyle O'quinn was a guy they had interest in last year who is a UFA> Wayne Ellington would be a nice crabbe replacement/Harris injury insurance. Tyson chandler would be awesome to mentor/backup allen. Rudy gay is in the ring chance stage of his career. we probably draft a backup center like rumored too
Kyrie | Dinwiddie
Harris | Ellington | Musa
Durant | Levert | Gay
Prince | Kurucs
Allen | Chandler | Rookie
I think the inclusion of the incomplete roster charges are incorrect. One, probably two of them should fall off.
1) As soon as the first non-Nets FA is signed (Irving) you have one less incomplete roster spot, so when signing the 2nd FA, you would need to account for one less.
2) My understanding is that the money held my a incomplete roster slot can be used towards signing a player. The intent is that it would get you right at the cap when you sign your 12th player. Thus only $890k under the cap after you sign #11, $1.78mil after signing #10, etc.
If I'm correct on #2, after signing Irving & waiving Napier & Graham we'd be at 10 players. FA #2 would be able to entitled to about $16.6mil. If we trade just Dinwiddie for a future asset, we'd be able to offer a guy like Harris a deal starting around $26.26mil. If we could get Tobias starting for a deal around that (or if Irving will take $32mil, so Tobias can get a round $27mil) that would be ideal.
You are correct sir.
Same concept below
I
I
I
V
vincecarter4pres wrote:Just renouncing Ed Davis gets us uber close to a 7 to 9 year max. He doesn't even create another cap hold, because technically you only have to account for 11 cap holds, since it's implied the signing of a free agent removes the 12th so that cap hold amount can be included in said free agents first year base salary.
When you have over max cap you can remove the additional as well, because it is assumed you will sign multiple players. And they come off in real time as you sign guys and can most certainly be included in base year salary.
For instance, you have more than the highest max in cap as we do now and have 10 players either under contract or their cap holds accounted for such as DLo's and draft pick holds, you don't need to account for cap holds for roster charges 11 and 12, that cap is simply open because it's assumed you're signing at least 2 more players.