MrFortune3 wrote:
The Pelicans are today, a better franchise than when they had Anthony Davis...that's crazy to say.
I agree, although a big reason why is that they got lucky in the lottery.
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
MrFortune3 wrote:
The Pelicans are today, a better franchise than when they had Anthony Davis...that's crazy to say.
Dresden wrote:IMO, the Warriors are better off without Durant. Investing 225 mil in him, when he's going to miss next season, then probably needing a good part of the next year to recover and get back to form, and he'll be 32 that year. So you're paying him about 55 mil a year for 4 years, coming off an achilles team, and you're getting his years 32-36. Him not re-signing saved the Warriors from making a huge mistake.
Dresden wrote:MrFortune3 wrote:
The Pelicans are today, a better franchise than when they had Anthony Davis...that's crazy to say.
I agree, although a big reason why is that they got lucky in the lottery.
Indomitable wrote:The Knicks board is freaking out.
Dresden wrote:Indomitable wrote:The Knicks board is freaking out.
Once again, all the pundits predicting great things for the Knicks get egg on their faces. Remember all the reporting on how Durant to the Knicks was a "virtual certainty"?
Not only did they not get KD, but their cross town rivals now stole all their glory. I almost feel bad for Knick's fans. But not for everyone in the media who was just dying to write their "The Knicks Are Back!" stories.
MrFortune3 wrote:Dresden wrote:IMO, the Warriors are better off without Durant. Investing 225 mil in him, when he's going to miss next season, then probably needing a good part of the next year to recover and get back to form, and he'll be 32 that year. So you're paying him about 55 mil a year for 4 years, coming off an achilles team, and you're getting his years 32-36. Him not re-signing saved the Warriors from making a huge mistake.
I wanna see what they are going to do. It's Steph, Klay and Green once again and Klay is going to miss some time next year.
They are going to have to hit on their draft picks, develop guys and then probably make a trade or 2 to still contend.
Their dynasty isn't over, just the KD era.

Indomitable wrote:Dresden wrote:Indomitable wrote:The Knicks board is freaking out.
Once again, all the pundits predicting great things for the Knicks get egg on their faces. Remember all the reporting on how Durant to the Knicks was a "virtual certainty"?
Not only did they not get KD, but their cross town rivals now stole all their glory. I almost feel bad for Knick's fans. But not for everyone in the media who was just dying to write their "The Knicks Are Back!" stories.
I enjoy every minute



DuckIII wrote:Indomitable wrote:Dresden wrote:
Once again, all the pundits predicting great things for the Knicks get egg on their faces. Remember all the reporting on how Durant to the Knicks was a "virtual certainty"?
Not only did they not get KD, but their cross town rivals now stole all their glory. I almost feel bad for Knick's fans. But not for everyone in the media who was just dying to write their "The Knicks Are Back!" stories.
I enjoy every minute
I have never felt bad for Knick’s fans. They are ass hats and always have been.

Chicago-Bull-E wrote:Damn, there goes Brogdon. I would have done 4/85.
I think Milwaukee matches though.
Chicago-Bull-E wrote:Damn, there goes Brogdon. I would have done 4/85.
I think Milwaukee matches though.