machu46 wrote:I know this is terrible of me, but refresh my memory on who GrandAdmiralDan is?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
machu46 wrote:I know this is terrible of me, but refresh my memory on who GrandAdmiralDan is?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
Giannis pretty much destroyed Detroit and Boston by himself.H2tObes wrote:msiris wrote:Ummmm. We were 11-7 without him. Without Midds we were 4-1.H2tObes wrote:I actually like that we reloaded on picks if we were going to lose him anyway. He needs to be replaced though if we want to seriously contend, curious to see who we target. Bucks performed pretty well without Brogdon last season so I can see why they thought he was expendable.
Do playoff games not count?
msiris wrote:Giannis pretty much destroyed Detroit and Boston by himself.H2tObes wrote:msiris wrote:Ummmm. We were 11-7 without him. Without Midds we were 4-1.
Do playoff games not count?
Bernman wrote:GBPackers47 wrote:trwi7 wrote:
You must love Bud Selig.
Yea dude. Have a shrine.
Miss.
Just about anybody else would have kept the franchise in Milwaukee because it was a prerequisite of the deal, unless they couldn't get the arena deal done eventually. Which they did, while scamming the public out of a hundred million dollars because they sold the start building by date as a build by one and presented Kohl's donation to the arena/public as their own. Not exactly something that should engender good will forever which should give them a free pass when other indiscretions occur. If anything the opposite is the case. They should be held to a higher standard. Unless you're an authority worshiping sucker.
H2tObes wrote:msiris wrote:Ummmm. We were 11-7 without him. Without Midds we were 4-1.H2tObes wrote:I actually like that we reloaded on picks if we were going to lose him anyway. He needs to be replaced though if we want to seriously contend, curious to see who we target. Bucks performed pretty well without Brogdon last season so I can see why they thought he was expendable.
Do playoff games not count?
awd4cy wrote:H2tObes wrote:msiris wrote:Ummmm. We were 11-7 without him. Without Midds we were 4-1.
Do playoff games not count?
One could argue the 4 against Detroit with an injured Blake Griffin don’t. I guess you’ll just have to wait an see when we run into the several games where Lopez, Bled, and Midds or anyone on the bench can’t buy a 3 and will no longer have Brogdon to rely on.
stillgotgame wrote:Isaiah Thomas anyone? We need another shooter. If he's healthy...
H2tObes wrote:awd4cy wrote:H2tObes wrote:Do playoff games not count?
One could argue the 4 against Detroit with an injured Blake Griffin don’t. I guess you’ll just have to wait an see when we run into the several games where Lopez, Bled, and Midds or anyone on the bench can’t buy a 3 and will no longer have Brogdon to rely on.
Imagine just not counting games because it doesn't fit your agenda
Plossum wrote:stillgotgame wrote:Isaiah Thomas anyone? We need another shooter. If he's healthy...
It’s tempting at the vet min for a year but I get the impression he’s a bit of a douche. Not sure we want that bad juju around.

paulpressey25 wrote:I'm still sorting this TPE stuff in my head.
1. Bucks stretch Leuer creating $18mm (?) cap space.
2. Bucks try to sign Hill and Lopez with that cap space (but I think they still need Brogdon's $3mm cap hold to go away to fit both in)
3. Bucks sign Middleton (now over cap clearly
4. Bucks S&T Brogdon and generate TPE.
I'm just lost though where they get the salary cap room to sign Lopez and Hill to those reported numbers without renouncing Brogdon.
awd4cy wrote:H2tObes wrote:awd4cy wrote:One could argue the 4 against Detroit with an injured Blake Griffin don’t. I guess you’ll just have to wait an see when we run into the several games where Lopez, Bled, and Midds or anyone on the bench can’t buy a 3 and will no longer have Brogdon to rely on.
Imagine just not counting games because it doesn't fit your agenda
You mean like you’ve done? No mention of the team being 4-1 without Middleton. Maybe he doesn’t have the type of impact you think he does. Do you think the Bucks lose vs Detroit without Middleton?

emunney wrote:GrandAdmiralDan wrote:Order of operations is important. First things that have to happen, are using cap space to sign Lopez or Hill, then shedding about $6 mil of salary (via Leuer stretch or Ersan dump/stretch), and using cap space to sign whichever of Lopez or Hill hasn't been signed. Then, we can, in any order, use the room mid level exception, sign Middleton, S&T Brogdon. That process DOES create a TPE.
Was hoping you'd stop by. Saw Bobby Marks call it a 12m TPE. Why so small? BYC?
paulpressey25 wrote:I'm still sorting this TPE stuff in my head.
1. Bucks stretch Leuer creating $18mm (?) cap space.
2. Bucks try to sign Hill and Lopez with that cap space (but I think they still need Brogdon's $3mm cap hold to go away to fit both in)
3. Bucks sign Middleton (now over cap clearly
4. Bucks S&T Brogdon and generate TPE.
I'm just lost though where they get the salary cap room to sign Lopez and Hill to those reported numbers without renouncing Brogdon.
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
awd4cy wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Loved Malcolm as a player and a person, and I wish him well even on a division rival team, but if you think that he was/is the difference in winning a championship or not, then I'm gonna say that you were never sold on this team as a championship contender in the first place. One of the free agents was always gonna have to be expendable, and unfortunately it was him. They're obviously not done making moves so I'm interested to see what they do with those picks and the salary exceptions.
So we can win a championship with the same team that couldn’t last year, only to plug either Sterling Brown or Pat C in the starting lineup?
awd4cy wrote:H2tObes wrote:awd4cy wrote:One could argue the 4 against Detroit with an injured Blake Griffin don’t. I guess you’ll just have to wait an see when we run into the several games where Lopez, Bled, and Midds or anyone on the bench can’t buy a 3 and will no longer have Brogdon to rely on.
Imagine just not counting games because it doesn't fit your agenda
You mean like you’ve done? No mention of the team being 4-1 without Middleton. Maybe he doesn’t have the type of impact you think he does. Do you think the Bucks lose vs Detroit without Middleton?
DavidDunn21 wrote:So please allow me to continue to be the scapegoat for our very rational fears, but just remember that I understand and forgive all of you.

emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters
THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.