ImageImageImage

Keldon Johnson

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

DCintheD
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,949
And1: 653
Joined: May 30, 2010
   

Keldon Johnson 

Post#1 » by DCintheD » Tue May 28, 2019 7:58 pm

Let's talk about this kid. I like what I hear about him.

https://www.nbadraft.net/players/keldon-johnson

some clips from the above link:

He’s a well-rounded player who’s adept at a lot of things…. Willing to do the dirty work on both ends of the floor ...Has shown the desire to guard his man the full length of the court ... His defensive impact doesn’t show up on the stat sheet ... A winner. A natural leader with very good intangibles ...
RIP PALACE OF AUBURN HILLS
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,817
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#2 » by MotownMadness » Tue May 28, 2019 8:03 pm

I like him, he takes a hit because scouts don’t see him excelling in one particular area. He’s so young and all around skilled though that I see the potential.

I was thinking up a scenario where maybe the Spurs like someone at 15 enough to give us 19 and 29. Could then add some needed depth grabbing Keldon Johnson and Okeke.
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,824
And1: 4,803
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#3 » by vege » Wed May 29, 2019 12:27 am

DCintheD wrote:A winner. A natural leader with very good intangibles ...


Good, we found the next Stanley Johnson.
DCintheD
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,949
And1: 653
Joined: May 30, 2010
   

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#4 » by DCintheD » Wed May 29, 2019 2:00 am

vege wrote:
DCintheD wrote:A winner. A natural leader with very good intangibles ...


Good, we found the next Stanley Johnson.

So because he’s a winner and a natural leader with very good intangibles that means he’s the next Stanley Johnson? Stanley couldn’t shoot. Try again.
RIP PALACE OF AUBURN HILLS
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,824
And1: 4,803
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#5 » by vege » Wed May 29, 2019 2:30 am

DCintheD wrote:
vege wrote:
DCintheD wrote:A winner. A natural leader with very good intangibles ...


Good, we found the next Stanley Johnson.

So because he’s a winner and a natural leader with very good intangibles that means he’s the next Stanley Johnson? Stanley couldn’t shoot. Try again.


Don't get offended, those are just the strengths SJ was supposed to have, so it looks like you're describing SJ a few years ago, and the fact that they share the same name (even tho Johnson is a very common name in the USA made it even funnier for me).

My post wasn't serious tho, I'm just being cynic because I do not believe in our FO and even less in our scouts and it's funny how every fan massively overhype prospects every year and most of them don't end up being NBA material.
Moses ShamMoses
Analyst
Posts: 3,551
And1: 1,463
Joined: Nov 28, 2012
   

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#6 » by Moses ShamMoses » Wed May 29, 2019 11:17 am

I watched some highlights and a scouting tape on him...he seems pretty raw but his jumpshot is much cleaner than Stanley's was. I really liked his toughness as well. He sort of reminds me of the SF version of Bruce Brown.

Sent from my SM-G960U1 using RealGM mobile app
Jeff Van Gundy on his brother's Pistons: 'He took over the Titanic and it's sinking even quicker'
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,954
And1: 12,461
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#7 » by BadMofoPimp » Wed May 29, 2019 12:14 pm

vege wrote:
DCintheD wrote:
vege wrote:
Good, we found the next Stanley Johnson.

So because he’s a winner and a natural leader with very good intangibles that means he’s the next Stanley Johnson? Stanley couldn’t shoot. Try again.


Don't get offended, those are just the strengths SJ was supposed to have, so it looks like you're describing SJ a few years ago, and the fact that they share the same name (even tho Johnson is a very common name in the USA made it even funnier for me).

My post wasn't serious tho, I'm just being cynic because I do not believe in our FO and even less in our scouts and it's funny how every fan massively overhype prospects every year and most of them don't end up being NBA material.


This is true for every board on RealGM.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
Mr Peanut
Analyst
Posts: 3,306
And1: 3,872
Joined: Jan 29, 2012
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#8 » by Mr Peanut » Wed May 29, 2019 1:03 pm

vege wrote:
DCintheD wrote:
vege wrote:
Good, we found the next Stanley Johnson.

So because he’s a winner and a natural leader with very good intangibles that means he’s the next Stanley Johnson? Stanley couldn’t shoot. Try again.


Don't get offended, those are just the strengths SJ was supposed to have, so it looks like you're describing SJ a few years ago, and the fact that they share the same name (even tho Johnson is a very common name in the USA made it even funnier for me).

My post wasn't serious tho, I'm just being cynic because I do not believe in our FO and even less in our scouts and it's funny how every fan massively overhype prospects every year and most of them don't end up being NBA material.


I think it's far too early in the piece to make a fair judgement of our FO/scouts. Got to at least give them three seasons before making those sort of calls (especially with the mess that SVG left behind).
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,824
And1: 4,803
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#9 » by vege » Wed May 29, 2019 5:17 pm

Mr Peanut wrote:
vege wrote:
DCintheD wrote:So because he’s a winner and a natural leader with very good intangibles that means he’s the next Stanley Johnson? Stanley couldn’t shoot. Try again.


Don't get offended, those are just the strengths SJ was supposed to have, so it looks like you're describing SJ a few years ago, and the fact that they share the same name (even tho Johnson is a very common name in the USA made it even funnier for me).

My post wasn't serious tho, I'm just being cynic because I do not believe in our FO and even less in our scouts and it's funny how every fan massively overhype prospects every year and most of them don't end up being NBA material.


I think it's far too early in the piece to make a fair judgement of our FO/scouts. Got to at least give them three seasons before making those sort of calls (especially with the mess that SVG left behind).


That's the excuse they've been using while they get paid, the SVG mess. They've only made it worse, spending 2 2nds in last draft and giving all our money to a guy who is not NBA material at the start of the FA last year. Then they gave away one of our few starter material player and got absolutely nothing in return, that Bullock trade was a complete joke. And to make things worse, they took on future money trading for Maker, who is also a terrible player. The FO is worse than SVG imo. When SVG took over, he improved our talent level substantially via trades.
flow
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,670
And1: 2,839
Joined: Feb 18, 2016

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#10 » by flow » Wed May 29, 2019 5:39 pm

vege wrote:
Mr Peanut wrote:
vege wrote:
Don't get offended, those are just the strengths SJ was supposed to have, so it looks like you're describing SJ a few years ago, and the fact that they share the same name (even tho Johnson is a very common name in the USA made it even funnier for me).

My post wasn't serious tho, I'm just being cynic because I do not believe in our FO and even less in our scouts and it's funny how every fan massively overhype prospects every year and most of them don't end up being NBA material.


I think it's far too early in the piece to make a fair judgement of our FO/scouts. Got to at least give them three seasons before making those sort of calls (especially with the mess that SVG left behind).


That's the excuse they've been using while they get paid, the SVG mess. They've only made it worse, spending 2 2nds in last draft and giving all our money to a guy who is not NBA material at the start of the FA last year. Then they gave away one of our few starter material player and got absolutely nothing in return, that Bullock trade was a complete joke. And to make things worse, they took on future money trading for Maker, who is also a terrible player. The FO is worse than SVG imo. When SVG took over, he improved our talent level substantially via trades.


I was with you til the 2nd-to-last sentence. Gave you the +1 anyway. But nothing this FO did in year one comes anywhere near the debacle that was SVG's reign. You're right, he made a couple nice trades. But those positives were neutered by his many horrific signings.
User avatar
Mr Peanut
Analyst
Posts: 3,306
And1: 3,872
Joined: Jan 29, 2012
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#11 » by Mr Peanut » Thu May 30, 2019 10:16 am

vege wrote:
Mr Peanut wrote:
vege wrote:
Don't get offended, those are just the strengths SJ was supposed to have, so it looks like you're describing SJ a few years ago, and the fact that they share the same name (even tho Johnson is a very common name in the USA made it even funnier for me).

My post wasn't serious tho, I'm just being cynic because I do not believe in our FO and even less in our scouts and it's funny how every fan massively overhype prospects every year and most of them don't end up being NBA material.


I think it's far too early in the piece to make a fair judgement of our FO/scouts. Got to at least give them three seasons before making those sort of calls (especially with the mess that SVG left behind).


That's the excuse they've been using while they get paid, the SVG mess. They've only made it worse, spending 2 2nds in last draft and giving all our money to a guy who is not NBA material at the start of the FA last year. Then they gave away one of our few starter material player and got absolutely nothing in return, that Bullock trade was a complete joke. And to make things worse, they took on future money trading for Maker, who is also a terrible player. The FO is worse than SVG imo. When SVG took over, he improved our talent level substantially via trades.


And it's a fair excuse to use because how should they be expected to turn around our mediocre capped out roster in such a short space of time? Addressing your points:

1. Those two 2nd round picks became Khyri Thomas. He hasn't been given nearly enough time to prove whether he was worth them or not so it is far too early to make this assessment. You failed to mention they also drafted Bruce Brown who looks like he was great value for the 42nd pick.

2. Granted, the GRIII signing didn't pan out. But, unlike the SVG FO, they didn't commit long-term money to him. His team option can be declined this summer and spent elsewhere. No harm, no foul.

3. Bullock was expiring and at the time it seemed like the money to re-sign him was going to be out of our range. So they traded him for Svi and a 2nd (so basically two 2nds which isn't "absolutely nothing", or you wouldn't have made a big deal about losing two 2nds in the Khyri trade). Then they signed Wayne Ellington who provided equivalent production of what Bullock gave us anyway.

4. Maker did show some flashes but at the end of the day he is still developing. And it's only an extra year of salary for a cheap big. We also got rid of Stanley Johnson, which was basically addition by subtraction (our record post trade speaks for itself).

I just find it absolutely ludicrous that you could make such a damning assessment of the current front office after only one season, and those were the reasons you tried to use to justify it. Interested to hear your response though.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,954
And1: 12,461
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#12 » by BadMofoPimp » Thu May 30, 2019 12:50 pm

The more I read up on Keldon, the more I think he would fit with the Pistons. Especially, being he has the size to spend some time at SF. Mid round picks are hit or miss so may as well give it a shot.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Bknight4three
Junior
Posts: 436
And1: 219
Joined: Jun 20, 2012
     

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#13 » by Bknight4three » Thu May 30, 2019 2:21 pm

Watched a ton of UK games. Keldon looked awesome early in the years. He was the only freshman ready to compete. But he never progressed like most freshman do.

He is a good but not great athlete. He’s a super hard worker and very young so he might be worth a gamble, but I think there will be several better options at 15.
Bknight4three
Junior
Posts: 436
And1: 219
Joined: Jun 20, 2012
     

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#14 » by Bknight4three » Thu May 30, 2019 2:23 pm

I would much rather draft his teammate, PJ Washington.
vic
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 1,101
Joined: Dec 27, 2012

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#15 » by vic » Thu May 30, 2019 11:35 pm

I’d be ok with Keldon but I would prefer Nickeil A Walker, and find a 3&D sf in round 2.

NAW is a better overall talent and could play 1 or 2.

I’d rather get the higher talent level in round 1 and pickup a solid 3&D SF like Daquan Jeffries or Chuma Okeke later on.
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
DCintheD
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,949
And1: 653
Joined: May 30, 2010
   

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#16 » by DCintheD » Wed Jul 3, 2019 1:30 am

This dude balled out in his first summer league game. His j looks so smooth. Sucks he fell to 29 when we had 30.
RIP PALACE OF AUBURN HILLS
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,257
And1: 5,245
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#17 » by Kilo » Wed Jul 3, 2019 1:37 am

^Would have been interesting to see if he was on the board at #30 if we would have still traded out.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
User avatar
A_dub06
Starter
Posts: 2,071
And1: 967
Joined: Dec 02, 2013
 

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#18 » by A_dub06 » Wed Jul 3, 2019 1:52 am

DCintheD wrote:This dude balled out in his first summer league game. His j looks so smooth. Sucks he fell to 29 when we had 30.


It was his second game. In his first game he scored 4 points and grabbed 2 boards in 20 mins. Getting 29 pts 7 boards and 3 steals with good shooting %’s in 25 mins is an impressive improvement though. Will be interesting to see how he plays in his next game.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,817
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#19 » by MotownMadness » Wed Jul 3, 2019 3:11 am

Was hoping he would drop to 30. I think we would have kept him.
JohnReese
Senior
Posts: 590
And1: 281
Joined: Feb 15, 2016
   

Re: Keldon Johnson 

Post#20 » by JohnReese » Wed Jul 3, 2019 8:11 am

I want to remind everyone that Svi was amazing last year and he was not able to get minutes during the regular season. SL is nice to see potential but do not overreact with good performances. Stanley was very good during SL because he was able to dominate physically and then when the season started he was incapable of using those skills.

Return to Detroit Pistons