Bradley Beal

cb1mvp · Post #1 » by **cb1mvp** » Mon Jul 1, 2019 8:32 pm

Reggie + Langston + 2 future first rounders?

coordinator0 · Post #2 » by **coordinator0** » Mon Jul 1, 2019 8:33 pm

Not even remotely close.

MotownMadness · Post #3 » by **MotownMadness** » Mon Jul 1, 2019 8:33 pm

Lol no way that’s getting you very far

bstein14 · Post #4 » by **bstein14** » Mon Jul 1, 2019 8:39 pm

If they trade Beal, its because they decided to do a complete reset and rebuild and get younger.

Dre + Reggie + Galloway + Kennard + 2 future firsts for Wall + Beal+ Dwight

That's the type of deal that they would consider to get rid of Beal.

Canadafan · Post #5 » by **Canadafan** » Mon Jul 1, 2019 8:48 pm

cb1mvp wrote:Reggie + Langston + 2 future first rounders?

Plus Luke. Plus Sekou. Plus Brown. Plus Thon. Plus another 1st. Plus some seconds.
Lol but I'm down :nod:

tradez401 · Post #6 » by **tradez401** » Mon Jul 1, 2019 8:51 pm

kennard would definitely be part of the trade for beal.

DCintheD · Post #7 » by **DCintheD** » Mon Jul 1, 2019 9:18 pm

It would take an AD type deal to get Beal. We don’t have the quality of players it would take to put together a package like that, nor should we give away 3 1sts for a player that will leave us in 2 years.

DBC10 · Post #8 » by **DBC10** » Tue Jul 2, 2019 12:29 am

If you trade for Beal, they want young assets. So Kennard is at least going to get you more than a 10 second phone call. Not that he's even really all that much valued, but we wouldn't need Luke anyways if Beal was in play.

440BB · Post #9 » by **440BB** » Tue Jul 2, 2019 1:52 am

Jackson and Galloway will only fetch a ham sandwich and a bag of chips, which is less than Beal is worth.

Kilo · Post #10 » by **Kilo** » Tue Jul 2, 2019 1:59 am

Some phonies on twitter trying to pretend this is a thing. Talking about their "sources" like Beal being available wouldn't have any of the big name news breaker types all over it.

Worst part is it's working as their followers have been climbing.

SamFlow · Post #11 » by **SamFlow** » Tue Jul 2, 2019 3:07 am

It would start with RJ-Langston-Luke and two firsts, no protection. Anything less and it would be a hard no.

Spider156 · Post #12 » by **Spider156** » Tue Jul 2, 2019 3:57 am

SamFlow wrote:It would start with RJ-Langston-Luke and two firsts, no protection. Anything less and it would be a hard no.

I would make that trade.

buzzkilloton · Post #13 » by **buzzkilloton** » Tue Jul 2, 2019 7:31 am

If they were really trying to trade him they would of put him on the block predraft.

Before he blew up with Wall out last season the raps tried trading for him. The asking price was Siakam/OG/2 first rounders. We cant offer that kind of package we dont have a asset like Siakam. Keep in mind the price is even higher now with how good he was the rest of the year.

DBC10 · Post #14 » by **DBC10** » Tue Jul 2, 2019 11:10 am

buzzkilloton wrote:If they were really trying to trade him they would of put him on the block predraft.

Before he blew up with Wall out last season the raps tried trading for him. The asking price was Siakam/OG/2 first rounders. We cant offer that kind of package we dont have a asset like Siakam. Keep in mind the price is even higher now with how good he was the rest of the year.

And he's only like 26. So plenty of prime years left to go for him for any team.

TGW · Post #15 » by **TGW** » Tue Jul 2, 2019 12:40 pm

The Pistons have nothing worth Beal.

SamFlow · Post #16 » by **SamFlow** » Thu Jul 4, 2019 4:25 pm

RJ, Langston, Kennard, two first rounders. Would you go up to three first rounders? If we got back second rounders to go with them yes. Three first rounders out, a couple second rounders in. I'd still do that. And with the savings they would get to rebuild, they should do that.

Sheeeeed · Post #17 » by **Sheeeeed** » Thu Jul 4, 2019 4:31 pm

TGW wrote:The Pistons have nothing worth Beal.

This.

hoophabit · Post #18 » by **hoophabit** » Thu Jul 4, 2019 6:52 pm

Sheeeeed wrote:
TGW wrote:The Pistons have nothing worth Beal.

This.

"This" is absurd. I like Beal, and he's a good player. To suggest that every good Pistons player, plus 1st round picks aren't worth 1 Bradley Beal is just silly. Washington has been such an unstoppable force since the advent of Bradley Beal? I'll say it again, in sports serendipity plays a huge role. Cheer TF up.

Post #19 » by **Snakebites** » Thu Jul 4, 2019 8:00 pm

hoophabit wrote:
Sheeeeed wrote:
TGW wrote:The Pistons have nothing worth Beal.

This.

"This" is absurd. I like Beal, and he's a good player. To suggest that every good Pistons player, plus 1st round picks aren't worth 1 Bradley Beal is just silly. Washington has been such an unstoppable force since the advent of Bradley Beal? I'll say it again, in sports serendipity plays a huge role. Cheer TF up.

I think what was meant by the comment was that there’s no realistic package for Beal, not that the sum of our assets doesn’t equal Beal.

My assets equal more than a Ferrari. Doesn’t mean I can realistically purchase one. I don’t have enough value.

You can disagree on that point if you like, but it’s not absurd. He’s a relatively young star perimeter player.

TGW · Post #20 » by **TGW** » Thu Jul 4, 2019 8:42 pm

hoophabit wrote:
Sheeeeed wrote:
TGW wrote:The Pistons have nothing worth Beal.

This.

"This" is absurd. I like Beal, and he's a good player. To suggest that every good Pistons player, plus 1st round picks aren't worth 1 Bradley Beal is just silly. Washington has been such an unstoppable force since the advent of Bradley Beal? I'll say it again, in sports serendipity plays a huge role. Cheer TF up.

Yes, you’re right. Technically, if the pistons gave up an unreasonable amount of first rounders, they could have Beal. Key word here is “unreasonable.” The wizards asking price would be astronomical, and it would be so one-sided, even the pistons would be forced to say no.